Allan S E, Blough D S
Percept Psychophys. 1989 Nov;46(5):456-64. doi: 10.3758/bf03210860.
Pigeon and human subjects searched for one target item amidst a number of identical distractors. Simple line forms were used. The target differed from the distractors only in terms of the presence or absence of a feature (a line or a gap); in some experimental series, the feature was present in the target; in others, the feature was in the distractors. The pigeons pecked at the target; the human subjects either reported the presence of the target or pointed to it with a light pen. The time between display onset and this response was recorded. Varied across experimental conditions were the number of distractors in the display, the nature of the stimulus forms, and certain procedural parameters; five conditions were run with pigeons and three with humans. Under all test conditions, the results from the human subjects replicated the previously reported search-asymmetry effect. That is, search speed was greater and decreased less with display size when the target bore the feature (line or gap) than when the distractors bore the feature; both yes/no and localization-response conditions yielded this effect. However, pigeons failed to show search asymmetry; neither line nor gap in a target facilitated search. The results suggest that early visual processing differs for pigeons and humans, that pigeon features differ from human features, or that search asymmetry was eliminated by the long practice given the pigeons.
鸽子和人类受试者在多个相同的干扰物中寻找一个目标物品。使用的是简单的线条形式。目标与干扰物的区别仅在于是否存在某个特征(一条线或一个缺口);在一些实验系列中,特征存在于目标中;在其他实验系列中,特征存在于干扰物中。鸽子啄目标;人类受试者要么报告目标的存在,要么用发光笔指向目标。记录显示开始到做出该反应之间的时间。显示中的干扰物数量、刺激形式的性质以及某些程序参数在不同实验条件下有所变化;对鸽子进行了五种条件的测试,对人类进行了三种条件的测试。在所有测试条件下,人类受试者的结果重复了先前报道的搜索不对称效应。也就是说,当目标带有特征(线或缺口)时,搜索速度更快,并且随着显示大小的增加下降得更少,而当干扰物带有特征时则不然;“是/否”和定位反应条件都产生了这种效应。然而,鸽子没有表现出搜索不对称;目标中的线或缺口都没有促进搜索。结果表明,鸽子和人类的早期视觉处理存在差异,鸽子的特征与人类的特征不同,或者是由于对鸽子进行了长期训练,消除了搜索不对称。