Hughes Laura, Wilkins Kimberly, Goldsmith Cynthia S, Smith Scott, Hudson Paul, Patel Nishi, Karem Kevin, Damon Inger, Li Yu, Olson Victoria A, Satheshkumar P S
Poxvirus and Rabies Branch, Division of High-Consequence Pathogens and Pathology, National Center for Emerging Zoonotic Infectious Diseases, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA 30329, USA.
Poxvirus and Rabies Branch, Division of High-Consequence Pathogens and Pathology, National Center for Emerging Zoonotic Infectious Diseases, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA 30329, USA.
J Virol Methods. 2017 May;243:68-73. doi: 10.1016/j.jviromet.2017.01.018. Epub 2017 Jan 26.
Virus purification in a high-containment setting provides unique challenges due to barrier precautions and operational safety approaches that are not necessary in lower biosafety level (BSL) 2 environments. The need for high risk group pathogen diagnostic assay development, anti-viral research, pathogenesis and vaccine efficacy research necessitates work in BSL-3 and BSL-4 labs with infectious agents. When this work is performed in accordance with BSL-4 practices, modifications are often required in standard protocols. Classical virus purification techniques are difficult to execute in a BSL-3 or BSL-4 laboratory because of the work practices used in these environments. Orthopoxviruses are a family of viruses that, in some cases, requires work in a high-containment laboratory and due to size do not lend themselves to simpler purification methods. Current CDC purification techniques of orthopoxviruses uses 1,1,2-trichlorotrifluoroethane, commonly known as Genetron. Genetron is a chlorofluorocarbon (CFC) that has been shown to be detrimental to the ozone and has been phased out and the limited amount of product makes it no longer a feasible option for poxvirus purification purposes. Here we demonstrate a new Orthopoxvirus purification method that is suitable for high-containment laboratories and produces virus that is not only comparable to previous purification methods, but improves on purity and yield.
在高防护环境中进行病毒纯化面临着独特的挑战,这是由于屏障预防措施和操作安全方法在较低生物安全水平(BSL)2环境中并非必需。对高风险群体病原体诊断检测方法开发、抗病毒研究、发病机制及疫苗效力研究的需求使得在BSL-3和BSL-4实验室中对感染性因子开展相关工作成为必要。当按照BSL-4规范进行这项工作时,通常需要对标准方案进行修改。由于这些环境中所采用的工作规范,经典的病毒纯化技术在BSL-3或BSL-4实验室中难以实施。正痘病毒是一类病毒,在某些情况下需要在高防护实验室中开展工作,并且由于其大小,不适合采用更简单的纯化方法。美国疾病控制与预防中心(CDC)目前的正痘病毒纯化技术使用1,1,2-三氯三氟乙烷,通常称为氟利昂。氟利昂是一种氯氟烃(CFC),已被证明对臭氧层有害,现已逐步淘汰,且产品数量有限,使其不再是用于痘病毒纯化目的的可行选择。在此,我们展示了一种适用于高防护实验室的新型正痘病毒纯化方法,该方法所产生的病毒不仅与先前的纯化方法相当,而且在纯度和产量上有所提高。