Tota Joseph E, Struyf Frank, Merikukka Marko, Gonzalez Paula, Kreimer Aimée R, Bi Dan, Castellsagué Xavier, de Carvalho Newton S, Garland Suzanne M, Harper Diane M, Karkada Naveen, Peters Klaus, Pope Willy A J, Porras Carolina, Quint Wim, Rodriguez Ana Cecilia, Schiffman Mark, Schussler John, Skinner S Rachel, Teixeira Júlio Cesar, Wheeler Cosette M, Herrero Rolando, Hildesheim Allan, Lehtinen Matti
Affiliations of authors: Division of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics, National Cancer Institute, Rockville, MD (JET, ARK, MS, AH); GSK Vaccines, Wavre, Belgium (FS, DB); National Institute for Health and Welfare, Oulu, Finland (MM); Proyecto Epidemiológico Guanacaste, Fundación INCIENSA, San José, Costa Rica (PG); Cancer Epidemiology Research Program, Catalan Institute of Oncology (ICO)-IDIBELL, CIBER-ESP, L'Hospitalet de Llobregat, Spain (XC); Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Federal University of Paraná, Infectious Diseases in Gynecology and Obstetrics Sector/Clinics Hospital, Curitiba, Brazil (NSdC); Department of Microbiology and Infectious Diseases, Royal Women's Hospital, Parkville, Victoria, Australia (SMG); Murdoch Childrens Research Institute, Parkville, Victoria, Australia (SMG); Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University of Melbourne, Victoria, Parkville, Australia (SMG); Geisel School of Medicine at Dartmouth, Hanover, NH (DMH); GSK Vaccines, Bangalore, India (NK); Berner Heerweg 157, Hamburg, Germany (KP); Department of Gynaecology, University Hospital KU Leuven Gasthuisberg, Leuven, Belgium (WAJP); Proyecto Epidemiológico Guanacaste, Fundación INCIENSA, San José, Costa Rica (CP, ACR, RH); DDL Diagnostic Laboratory, Rijswijk, the Netherlands (WQ); Information Management Systems, Rockville, MD (JS); Vaccines Trials Group, Telethon Institute for Child Health Research, Perth, WA, and Sydney University Discipline of Paediatrics and Child Health, Children's Hospital Westmead, Sydney, NSW, Australia (SRS); Department of Gynecology, Oncology Division-CAISM, State University of Campinas, Campinas, Brazil (JCT); University of Tampere, School of Public Health, Tampere, Finland (ML).
J Natl Cancer Inst. 2017 Jan 28;109(7). doi: 10.1093/jnci/djw300. Print 2017 Jan.
Current HPV vaccines do not protect against all oncogenic HPV types. Following vaccination, type replacement may occur, especially if different HPV types competitively interact during natural infection. Because of their common route of transmission, it is difficult to assess type interactions in observational studies. Our aim was to evaluate type replacement in the setting of HPV vaccine randomized controlled trials (RCTs).
Data were pooled from the Costa Rica Vaccine Trial (CVT; NCT00128661) and PATRICIA trial (NCT001226810)-two large-scale, double-blind RCTs of the HPV-16/18 AS04-adjuvanted vaccine-to compare cumulative incidence of nonprotected HPV infections across trial arms after four years. Negative rate difference estimates (rate in control minus vaccine arm) were interpreted as evidence of replacement if the associated 95% confidence interval excluded zero. All statistical tests were two-sided.
After applying relevant exclusion criteria, 21 596 women were included in our analysis (HPV arm = 10 750; control arm = 10 846). Incidence rates (per 1000 infection-years) were lower in the HPV arm than in the control arm for grouped nonprotected oncogenic types (rate difference = 1.6, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.9 to 2.3) and oncogenic/nononcogenic types (rate difference = 0.2, 95% CI = -0.3 to 0.7). Focusing on individual HPV types separately, no deleterious effect was observed. In contrast, a statistically significant protective effect (positive rate difference and 95% CI excluded zero) was observed against oncogenic HPV types 35, 52, 58, and 68/73, as well as nononcogenic types 6 and 70.
HPV type replacement does not occur among vaccinated individuals within four years and is unlikely to occur in vaccinated populations.
目前的人乳头瘤病毒(HPV)疫苗并不能预防所有致癌性HPV类型。接种疫苗后,可能会发生型别替代,尤其是在自然感染期间不同HPV型别发生竞争性相互作用时。由于它们的传播途径相同,在观察性研究中很难评估型别间的相互作用。我们的目的是在HPV疫苗随机对照试验(RCT)的背景下评估型别替代情况。
数据来自哥斯达黎加疫苗试验(CVT;NCT00128661)和PATRICIA试验(NCT001226810)——两项关于HPV-16/18 AS04佐剂疫苗的大规模双盲RCT——以比较四年后各试验组中未受保护的HPV感染的累积发病率。如果相关的95%置信区间不包括零,则将负率差估计值(对照组减去疫苗组的率)解释为替代的证据。所有统计检验均为双侧检验。
应用相关排除标准后,21596名女性纳入我们的分析(HPV组 = 10750;对照组 = 10846)。对于分组的未受保护的致癌型别(率差 = 1.6,95%置信区间[CI] = 0.9至2.3)和致癌/非致癌型别(率差 = 0.2,95%CI = -0.3至0.7),HPV组的发病率(每1000感染年)低于对照组。分别关注个体HPV型别,未观察到有害影响。相反,观察到对致癌性HPV型别35、52、58和68/73以及非致癌型别6和70有统计学显著的保护作用(正率差且95%CI不包括零)。
HPV型别替代在接种疫苗个体中四年内不会发生,在接种疫苗人群中也不太可能发生。