Nelson Geoffrey, Caplan Rachel, MacLeod Timothy, Macnaughton Eric, Cherner Rebecca, Aubry Tim, Méthot Christian, Latimer Eric, Piat Myra, Plenert Erin, McCullough Scott, Zell Sarah, Patterson Michelle, Stergiopoulos Vicky, Goering Paula
Wilfrid Laurier University, Waterloo, ON, Canada.
University of Ottawa, Ottawa, ON, Canada.
Am J Community Psychol. 2017 Mar;59(1-2):144-157. doi: 10.1002/ajcp.12119. Epub 2017 Jan 30.
This research examined the sustainability of Canada's At Home/Chez Soi Housing First (HF) programs for homeless persons with mental illness 2 years after the end of the demonstration phase of a large (more than 2000 participants enrolled), five-site, randomized controlled trial. Qualitative interviews were conducted with 142 participants (key informants, HF staff, and persons with lived experience) to understand sustainability outcomes and factors that influenced those outcomes. Also, a self-report HF fidelity measure was completed for nine HF programs that continued after the demonstration project. A cross-site analysis was performed, using the five sites as case studies. The findings revealed that nine of the 12 HF programs (75%) were sustained, and that seven of the nine programs reported a high level of fidelity (achieving an overall score of 3.5 or higher on a 4-point scale). The sites varied in terms of the level of systems integration and expansion of HF that were achieved. Factors that promoted or impeded sustainability were observed at multiple ecological levels: broad contextual (i.e., dissemination of research evidence, the policy context), community (i.e., partnerships, the presence of HF champions), organizational (i.e., leadership, ongoing training, and technical assistance), and individual (i.e., staff turnover, changes, and capacity). The findings are discussed in terms of the implementation science literature and their implications for how evidence-based programs like HF can be sustained.
本研究在一项大型(招募了2000多名参与者)、五站点随机对照试验的示范阶段结束两年后,考察了加拿大针对患有精神疾病的无家可归者的“在家/在自己家中”优先住房(HF)项目的可持续性。对142名参与者(关键信息提供者、HF工作人员和有实际经验者)进行了定性访谈,以了解可持续性结果以及影响这些结果的因素。此外,还为示范项目结束后仍在继续的9个HF项目完成了一份自我报告的HF保真度测量。以这五个站点为案例研究进行了跨站点分析。研究结果显示,12个HF项目中有9个(75%)得以持续,并且这9个项目中有7个报告了较高的保真度(在4分制量表上获得3.5分或更高的总分)。各站点在HF实现的系统整合水平和扩展方面存在差异。在多个生态层面观察到了促进或阻碍可持续性的因素:广泛的背景因素(即研究证据的传播、政策背景)、社区因素(即伙伴关系、HF倡导者的存在)、组织因素(即领导力、持续培训和技术援助)以及个人因素(即人员流动、变化和能力)。将根据实施科学文献对研究结果进行讨论,以及它们对像HF这样的循证项目如何得以持续的影响。