Centre for Urban Health Solutions, Li Ka Shing Knowledge Institute, St. Michael's Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
School of Psychology and Centre for Research on Educational and Community Services, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.
Int J Geriatr Psychiatry. 2018 Jan;33(1):85-95. doi: 10.1002/gps.4682. Epub 2017 Feb 16.
This study compares the effect of Housing First on older (≥50 years old) and younger (18-49 years old) homeless adults with mental illness participating in At Home/Chez Soi, a 24-month multisite randomized controlled trial of Housing First.
At Home/Chez Soi, participants (n = 2148) were randomized to receive rent supplements with intensive case management or assertive community treatment, based on their need level for mental health services, or usual care in their respective communities. A subgroup analysis compared older (n = 470) and younger (n = 1678) homeless participants across baseline characteristics and 24-month outcomes including housing stability (primary outcome), generic and condition-specific quality of life, community functioning, physical and mental health status, mental health symptom severity, psychological community integration, recovery, and substance use (secondary outcomes).
At 24 months, Housing First significantly improved the percentage of days stably housed among older (+43.9%, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 38.4% to 49.5%) and younger homeless adults (+39.7%, 95% CI: 36.8% to 42.6%), compared with usual care, with no significant differences between age groups (difference of differences = +4.2%, 95% CI: -2.1% to 10.5%, p = 0.188). Improvements from baseline to 24 months in mental health and condition-specific quality of life were significantly greater among older homeless adults than among younger homeless adults.
Housing First significantly improved housing stability among older and younger homeless adults with mental illness, resulting in superior mental health and quality of life outcomes in older homeless adults compared with younger homeless adults at 24 months. Copyright © 2017 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
本研究比较了住房优先策略对参与住房第一项目的老年(≥50 岁)和年轻(18-49 岁)有精神疾病的无家可归成年人的影响,这是一项为期 24 个月的住房第一多地点随机对照试验。
在住房第一项目中,根据精神健康服务需求水平,参与者(n=2148)被随机分配接受租金补贴和强化个案管理或积极社区治疗,或在各自社区接受常规护理。亚组分析比较了基线特征和 24 个月结果(包括住房稳定[主要结果]、一般和特定疾病的生活质量、社区功能、身心健康状况、心理健康症状严重程度、心理社会融合、康复和物质使用[次要结果])的老年(n=470)和年轻(n=1678)无家可归者。
在 24 个月时,与常规护理相比,住房优先策略显著提高了老年(+43.9%,95%置信区间[CI]:38.4%至 49.5%)和年轻无家可归者(+39.7%,95% CI:36.8%至 42.6%)稳定居住的天数比例,两组之间无显著差异(差异差异=+4.2%,95% CI:-2.1%至 10.5%,p=0.188)。与年轻的无家可归者相比,老年无家可归者的心理健康和特定疾病的生活质量从基线到 24 个月的改善更为显著。
住房优先策略显著提高了老年和年轻有精神疾病的无家可归者的住房稳定性,在 24 个月时,老年无家可归者的心理健康和生活质量结果优于年轻无家可归者。
版权所有©2017 约翰威立父子公司