School of Kinesiology, Louisiana State University, Baton Rouge, Louisiana.
Exercise & Sports Nutrition Laboratory, Texas A&M University, College Station, Texas.
J Strength Cond Res. 2018 Jan;32(1):195-200. doi: 10.1519/JSC.0000000000001802.
Allerton, TD, Earnest, CP, and Johannsen, NM. Metabolic and mechanical effects of laddermill graded exercise testing. J Strength Cond Res 32(1): 195-200, 2018-The purpose of this study was to compare the metabolic responses and mechanical impact forces during a maximal graded exercise test (GXT) on a laddermill (LM) vs. a standard treadmill (TM). Twenty college-aged men (n = 10) and women completed a GXT on the TM and LM in random order. During the GXT, expired gases (V[Combining Dot Above]O2 and V[Combining Dot Above]CO2), heart rate, accelerometer data, blood lactate (BLa), and rating of perceived exertion (RPE) were collected in the last minute of each stage. Data were analyzed by paired t-tests and presented herein as mean ± SD. Treadmill exercise resulted in a higher V[Combining Dot Above]O2peak than LM exercise (45.6 ± 7.5 vs. 41.2 ± 5.6 ml·kg·min, p < 0.001). Blood lactate threshold was similar (p = 0.2) between LM (62 ± 17% V[Combining Dot Above]O2peak) and TM (68 ± 1% V[Combining Dot Above]O2peak). The average activity level experienced during LM (0.14 ± 0.04 vector magnitude unit [VMU]) exercise was lower (p < 0.0001) vs. TM (0.67 ± 0.01 VMU). Additionally, impact forces were reduced (p < 0.005) from the vertical plane during LM (-0.46 ± 0.12g) compared with TM (-0.81 ± 0.06g) exercise. Our results suggest that the nature of LM exercise does not elicit the same V[Combining Dot Above]O2peak response observed during TM exercise. However, impact forces were reduced and energy expenditure remained higher during LM testing, whereas RPE was similar between modalities. LM exercise may provide an alternative to individuals seeking to incur a negative energy balance, but to whom higher impact forces are detrimental.
奥勒顿、欧内斯特和约翰森。 laddermill 递增负荷运动测试的代谢和力学效应。《力量与体能研究杂志》32(1):195-200,2018-本研究旨在比较在 laddermill(LM)和标准跑步机(TM)上进行最大递增负荷运动测试(GXT)时的代谢反应和力学冲击力。20 名大学生男女(n=10)随机完成了 TM 和 LM 上的 GXT。在 GXT 过程中,在最后一分钟收集了呼气末气体(V[Combining Dot Above]O2 和 V[Combining Dot Above]CO2)、心率、加速度计数据、血乳酸(BLa)和感知用力等级(RPE)。通过配对 t 检验进行数据分析,并在此呈现为平均值±标准差。跑步机运动导致的 V[Combining Dot Above]O2peak 高于 LM 运动(45.6±7.5 对 41.2±5.6ml·kg·min,p<0.001)。血乳酸阈相似(p=0.2),LM(62±17% V[Combining Dot Above]O2peak)和 TM(68±1% V[Combining Dot Above]O2peak)。LM(0.14±0.04 向量幅度单位 [VMU])运动的平均活动水平较低(p<0.0001),而 TM(0.67±0.01 VMU)运动则较高。此外,与 TM (-0.81±0.06g)相比,LM(-0.46±0.12g)运动时垂直平面的冲击力减小。我们的结果表明,LM 运动的性质不会引起与 TM 运动中观察到的相同的 V[Combining Dot Above]O2peak 反应。然而,在 LM 测试时,冲击力降低,能量消耗仍然较高,而 RPE 在两种模式之间相似。LM 运动可能为那些希望负平衡能量但又因高冲击力而受损的人提供替代方案。