Morgan Amy L, Laurent C Matthew, Fullenkamp Adam M
Exercise Physiology Lab, Exercise Science Program, School of Human Movement, Sport and Leisure Studies, Bowling Green State University, Bowling Green, Ohio.
J Strength Cond Res. 2016 Jul;30(7):1898-905. doi: 10.1519/JSC.0000000000001273.
Morgan, AL, Laurent, CM, and Fullenkamp, AM. Comparison of V[Combining Dot Above]O2peak performance on a motorized vs. a nonmotorized treadmill. J Strength Cond Res 30(7): 1898-1905, 2016-Despite growing popularity of nonmotorized treadmills (NMTs), little data exist regarding responses during exercise testing using this equipment, which is important when providing an appropriate exercise prescription. The purpose of this study was to evaluate physiological and perceptual responses during peak graded exercise tests (GXTs) on a motorized treadmill (MT) vs. NMT. Volunteers (12 men and 12 women aged 18-35 years) performed 2 peak GXT sessions (1 MT and 1 NMT). Respiratory gases and heart rate (HR) were collected each minute; perceptual response was estimated (Borg's 6-20 rating of perceived exertion [RPE] scale) during the final 10 seconds of each stage. Peak values (i.e., V[Combining Dot Above]O2, HR, speed) were determined during the final 10 seconds of each test; ventilatory threshold (VT) was assessed using the V-slope method. Paired t-tests matching variables measured at each stage of the GXT identified significantly higher values on the NMT for V[Combining Dot Above]O2 83% of the time, HR 67% of the time, and RPE 25% of the time. Interestingly though, neither peak V[Combining Dot Above]O2 (48.6 ± 9.2 ml·kg·min vs. 47.8 ± 8.9 ml·kg·min), peak HR (185 ± 9 b·min vs. 188 ± 10 b·min; p = 0.90), nor VT (72.7 ± 5.7% vs. 73.8 ± 5.4%) were significantly different on the NMT vs. the MT. However, significant differences were identified between NMT and MT tests for time to exhaustion (9:55 ± 1:49 vs. 12:05 ± 2:48; p < 0.01) and peak speed (8.0 ± 0.9 mph vs. 9.2 ± 1.4 mph; p < 0.01). Thus, although peak values obtained were similar between testing sessions on the NMT and MT, the majority of submaximal data were significantly different between trials. These differences are important when designing exercise prescriptions using submaximal values from NMT testing that may be inappropriately high or low at corresponding intensities during training.
摩根、AL、洛朗、CM和富伦坎普、AM。电动跑步机与非电动跑步机上最大摄氧量峰值表现的比较。《力量与体能研究杂志》30(7): 1898 - 1905,2016年。尽管非电动跑步机(NMT)越来越受欢迎,但关于使用该设备进行运动测试时的反应数据却很少,而这在提供合适的运动处方时很重要。本研究的目的是评估在电动跑步机(MT)与NMT上进行峰值分级运动测试(GXT)期间的生理和感知反应。志愿者(12名年龄在18 - 35岁之间的男性和12名女性)进行了2次峰值GXT训练(1次MT训练和1次NMT训练)。每分钟收集呼吸气体和心率(HR);在每个阶段的最后10秒估计感知反应(Borg的6 - 20自觉用力程度[RPE]量表)。在每次测试的最后10秒确定峰值(即最大摄氧量、HR、速度);使用V斜率法评估通气阈值(VT)。配对t检验匹配在GXT每个阶段测量的变量,结果显示在NMT上,最大摄氧量在83%的时间里、HR在67%的时间里以及RPE在25%的时间里显著更高。然而,有趣的是,无论是最大摄氧量峰值(48.6±9.2毫升·千克·分钟对47.8±8.9毫升·千克·分钟)、峰值HR(185±9次·分钟对188±10次·分钟;p = 0.90),还是VT(72.7±5.7%对73.8±5.4%),在NMT和MT上均无显著差异。但是,在NMT和MT测试之间,发现疲劳时间(9:55±1:49对12:05±2:48;p < 0.01)和峰值速度(8.0±0.9英里/小时对9.2±1.4英里/小时;p < 0.01)存在显著差异。因此,尽管在NMT和MT上测试获得的峰值相似,但大多数次最大数据在各试验之间存在显著差异。当使用来自NMT测试的次最大数据设计运动处方时,这些差异很重要,因为在训练期间相应强度下这些数据可能过高或过低。