Lloyd Brandon, Tee Boon Ching, Headley Colwyn, Emam Hany, Mallery Susan, Sun Zongyang
Division of Orthodontics, College of Dentistry, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, USA.
Division of Biosciences, College of Dentistry, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, USA.
Arch Oral Biol. 2017 May;77:1-11. doi: 10.1016/j.archoralbio.2017.01.012. Epub 2017 Jan 20.
Research has shown promise of using bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells (BMSCs) for craniofacial bone regeneration; yet little is known about the differences of BMSCs from limb and craniofacial bones. This study compared pig mandibular and tibia BMSCs for their in vitro proliferation, osteogenic differentiation properties and gene expression.
Bone marrow was aspirated from the tibia and mandible of 3-4 month-old pigs (n=4), followed by BMSC isolation, culture-expansion and characterization by flow cytometry. Proliferation rates were assessed using population doubling times. Osteogenic differentiation was evaluated by alkaline phosphatase activity. Affymetrix porcine microarray was used to compare gene expressions of tibial and mandibular BMSCs, followed by real-time RT-PCR evaluation of certain genes.
Our results showed that BMSCs from both locations expressed MSC markers but not hematopoietic markers. The proliferation and osteogenic differentiation potential of mandibular BMSCs were significantly stronger than those of tibial BMSCs. Microarray analysis identified 404 highly abundant genes, out of which 334 genes were matched between the two locations and annotated into the same functional groups including osteogenesis and angiogenesis, while 70 genes were mismatched and annotated into different functional groups. In addition, 48 genes were differentially expressed by at least 1.5-fold difference between the two locations, including higher expression of cranial neural crest-related gene BMP-4 in mandibular BMSCs, which was confirmed by real-time RT-PCR.
Altogether, these data indicate that despite strong similarities in gene expression between mandibular and tibial BMSCs, mandibular BMSCs express some genes differently than tibial BMSCs and have a phenotypic profile that may make them advantageous for craniofacial bone regeneration.
研究表明,使用骨髓间充质干细胞(BMSC)进行颅面骨再生具有前景;然而,对于来自四肢骨和颅面骨的BMSC之间的差异知之甚少。本研究比较了猪下颌骨和胫骨的BMSC在体外的增殖、成骨分化特性及基因表达。
从3 - 4月龄猪(n = 4)的胫骨和下颌骨中抽取骨髓,随后进行BMSC的分离、培养扩增及流式细胞术鉴定。使用群体倍增时间评估增殖率。通过碱性磷酸酶活性评估成骨分化。使用Affymetrix猪微阵列比较胫骨和下颌骨BMSC的基因表达,随后对某些基因进行实时RT-PCR评估。
我们的结果显示,来自两个部位的BMSC均表达MSC标志物,但不表达造血标志物。下颌骨BMSC的增殖和成骨分化潜能明显强于胫骨BMSC。微阵列分析鉴定出404个高丰度基因,其中334个基因在两个部位匹配并注释到相同的功能组,包括成骨和血管生成,而70个基因不匹配并注释到不同的功能组。此外,两个部位之间有48个基因的差异表达至少达1.5倍,包括下颌骨BMSC中颅神经嵴相关基因BMP - 4的表达较高,这通过实时RT-PCR得到证实。
总之,这些数据表明,尽管下颌骨和胫骨BMSC在基因表达上有很强的相似性,但下颌骨BMSC与胫骨BMSC相比,某些基因表达不同,且具有可能使其在颅面骨再生中具有优势的表型特征。