Suppr超能文献

临床试验中平衡与后勤保障之间的相互作用:一项案例研究。

The interaction between equipoise and logistics in clinical trials: A case study.

作者信息

Warshaw Meredith G, Carey Vincent J, McFarland Elizabeth J, Dawson Liza, Abrams Elaine, Melvin Ann, Fairlie Lee, Spiegel Hans, Jay Jonathan, Agwu Allison L

机构信息

1 Center for Biostatistics in AIDS Research, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA, USA.

2 Channing Division of Network Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.

出版信息

Clin Trials. 2017 Jun;14(3):314-318. doi: 10.1177/1740774517690734. Epub 2017 Jan 31.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Equipoise is usually discussed as an ethical issue in clinical trials. However, it also has practical implications.

BACKGROUND

Clinical equipoise is usually construed to mean uncertainty or disagreement among the expert clinician community. However, an individual physician's sense of equipoise may vary by location, based on the local standard of care or availability of specific treatment options, and these differences can affect providers' willingness to enroll participants into clinical trials. There are also logistical barriers to enrollment in international trials due to prolonged timelines for approvals by government agencies and ethical review boards.

CASE STUDY

A multinational clinical trial of bridging strategies for treatment of non-adherent HIV-infected youth, experienced differing perceptions of equipoise due to disparities in availability of treatment options by country. Unfortunately, the countries with most demand for the trial were those where the approval process was most delayed, and the study was closed early due to slow accrual.

DISCUSSION

When planning multicenter clinical trials, it is important to take into account heterogeneity among research sites and try to anticipate differences in equipoise and logistical factors between sites, in order to plan to address these issues at the design stage.

摘要

引言

在临床试验中, equipoise通常作为一个伦理问题进行讨论。然而,它也具有实际意义。

背景

临床 equipoise通常被理解为专家临床医生群体之间的不确定性或分歧。然而,个体医生的equipoise感可能因地点而异,这取决于当地的护理标准或特定治疗方案的可用性,而这些差异会影响提供者将参与者纳入临床试验的意愿。由于政府机构和伦理审查委员会的审批时间延长,国际试验的入组也存在后勤障碍。

案例研究

一项针对未坚持治疗的HIV感染青年的治疗桥接策略的多国临床试验,由于不同国家治疗方案的可用性存在差异,对equipoise有不同的看法。不幸的是,对该试验需求最大的国家正是审批过程最延迟的国家,并且由于入组缓慢,该研究提前结束。

讨论

在规划多中心临床试验时,重要的是要考虑研究地点之间的异质性,并尝试预测不同地点在equipoise和后勤因素方面的差异,以便在设计阶段计划解决这些问题。

相似文献

2
Community equipoise and the architecture of clinical research.社区均衡与临床研究架构
Camb Q Healthc Ethics. 1997 Fall;6(4):385-96. doi: 10.1017/s0963180100008136.
6
Clinical equipoise in sleep surgery: investigating clinical trial targets.睡眠手术中的临床均衡:研究临床试验目标。
Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2011 Aug;145(2):347-53. doi: 10.1177/0194599811406053. Epub 2011 Apr 26.
8
Rehabilitating equipoise.恢复平衡。
Kennedy Inst Ethics J. 2003 Jun;13(2):93-118. doi: 10.1353/ken.2003.0014.
9
Review of Clinical Equipoise: Examples from Oncology Trials.临床均衡性评价:肿瘤学试验实例。
Curr Rev Clin Exp Pharmacol. 2023;18(1):22-30. doi: 10.2174/2772432817666211221164101.

本文引用的文献

2
Equipoise should be amended, not abandoned.应当修改均衡原则,而非摒弃之。
Clin Trials. 2011 Aug;8(4):408-16. doi: 10.1177/1740774511409600. Epub 2011 Jul 11.
4
Pediatric adherence to HIV antiretroviral therapy.儿科患者对 HIV 抗逆转录病毒治疗的依从性。
Curr HIV/AIDS Rep. 2009 Nov;6(4):194-200. doi: 10.1007/s11904-009-0026-8.

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验