Schaefer C M, Greene R E, Oestmann J W, Kamalsky J M, Hall D A, Llewellyn H J, Robertson C L, Rhea J T, Rosenthal H, Rubens J R
Department of Radiology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston 02114.
Radiology. 1989 Dec;173(3):713-6. doi: 10.1148/radiology.173.3.2813775.
The technical and diagnostic performance of simultaneously acquired low-dose (44% of standard dose) storage-phosphor digital radiographs (system resolution = 0.2 mm, 10 bits) were compared with those of standard-dose conventional bedside radiographs of the chest in 32 patients. The mean optical density (OD) of the lungs (800 measurements) was closer to the ideal density with digital radiography (1.45 OD +/- 0.20 [standard deviation] vs 1.75 OD +/- 0.53) and was less often outside the usable range (2.5% vs 42.5%). Receiver operating characteristic analysis for detection of simulated nodules and monitoring devices (nine readers, 4,608 observations) showed that digital radiography was superior to conventional radiography (P less than .05) for four of the nine readers and equivalent to conventional radiography for five readers. The authors concluded that digital radiography produces more consistent and ideal image density and performs at least as well as conventional radiography under phantom test conditions.
