Suppr超能文献

高比例头孢吡肟-他唑巴坦(WCK 4282)对2014年全球收集的大量革兰氏阴性分离株的抗菌活性

Antimicrobial Activity of High-Proportion Cefepime-Tazobactam (WCK 4282) against a Large Number of Gram-Negative Isolates Collected Worldwide in 2014.

作者信息

Sader Helio S, Castanheira Mariana, Mendes Rodrigo E, Flamm Robert K, Jones Ronald N

机构信息

JMI Laboratories, North Liberty, Iowa, USA

JMI Laboratories, North Liberty, Iowa, USA.

出版信息

Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2017 Mar 24;61(4). doi: 10.1128/AAC.02409-16. Print 2017 Apr.

Abstract

Cefepime-tazobactam (WCK 4282) is currently under clinical development for use at a dosage of 2 g/2 g every 8 h. A total of 7,981 isolates were collected from 146 medical centers (39 countries) in 2014 as a part of the SENTRY Antimicrobial Surveillance Program, and their susceptibilities to cefepime-tazobactam (with tazobactam at fixed concentrations of 4 and 8 μg/ml) were tested by a reference broth microdilution method. Isolates were mainly from patients with pneumonia (29.5%) and bloodstream infections (26.9%). Cefepime-tazobactam (with tazobactam at a fixed concentration of 8 μg/ml) and cefepime inhibited 96.9 and 87.9% of strains at ≤8 μg/ml. The activity of cefepime-tazobactam against strains was comparable to that of meropenem (96.7% of isolates were susceptible) and greater than that of piperacillin-tazobactam (87.7% susceptible). All species from the United States except had >99.0% of isolates inhibited by cefepime-tazobactam at ≤8/8 μg/ml. The prevalence of the extended-spectrum β-lactamase (ESBL)-screening-positive phenotype was the highest among isolates in China (66.3%) and among isolates (58.0%) in Latin America. Cefepime-tazobactam at ≤8/8 μg/ml inhibited 98.7 and 71.3% of ESBL-screening-positive phenotype strains and strains, respectively. Meropenem showed limited activity against ESBL-screening-positive phenotype strains (69.6% susceptible). Cefepime-tazobactam was active against spp. (MIC and MIC, 0.06 and 0.5 μg/ml, respectively), including ceftazidime-nonsusceptible isolates (96.1% of isolates were inhibited by cefepime-tazobactam at ≤8/8 μg/ml). The activity of cefepime-tazobactam against (82.4 and 91.6% of isolates were inhibited by cefepime-tazobactam at ≤8/8 and ≤16/8 μg/ml, respectively) was comparable to that of meropenem and piperacillin-tazobactam (79.2% susceptible). In summary, cefepime-tazobactam was highly active against and strains, including ESBL-screening-positive phenotype strains and ceftazidime-nonsusceptible spp. These results support the further clinical development of the cefepime-tazobactam combination.

摘要

头孢吡肟-他唑巴坦(WCK 4282)目前正处于临床开发阶段,使用剂量为每8小时2克/2克。作为哨兵抗菌监测计划的一部分,2014年从146个医疗中心(39个国家)共收集了7981株分离菌,采用参考肉汤微量稀释法检测了它们对头孢吡肟-他唑巴坦(他唑巴坦固定浓度为4和8微克/毫升)的敏感性。分离菌主要来自肺炎患者(29.5%)和血流感染患者(26.9%)。头孢吡肟-他唑巴坦(他唑巴坦固定浓度为8微克/毫升)和头孢吡肟在≤8微克/毫升时分别抑制了96.9%和87.9%的菌株。头孢吡肟-他唑巴坦对菌株的活性与美罗培南相当(96.7%的分离菌敏感),且高于哌拉西林-他唑巴坦(87.7%敏感)。在美国,除了[具体菌种未提及]外,所有菌种在≤8/8微克/毫升时,超过99.0%的分离菌被头孢吡肟-他唑巴坦抑制。在中国的[具体菌种未提及]分离菌中,超广谱β-内酰胺酶(ESBL)筛选阳性表型的发生率最高(66.3%),在拉丁美洲的[具体菌种未提及]分离菌中也较高(58.0%)。≤8/8微克/毫升的头孢吡肟-他唑巴坦分别抑制了98.7%的ESBL筛选阳性表型[具体菌种未提及]菌株和71.3%的[具体菌种未提及]菌株。美罗培南对ESBL筛选阳性表型[具体菌种未提及]菌株的活性有限(69.6%敏感)。头孢吡肟-他唑巴坦对[具体菌种未提及]菌属有活性(MIC和MIC分别为0.06和0.5微克/毫升),包括对头孢他啶不敏感的分离菌(≤8/8微克/毫升时,96.1%的分离菌被头孢吡肟-他唑巴坦抑制)。头孢吡肟-他唑巴坦对[具体菌种未提及](≤8/8和≤16/8微克/毫升时,分别有82.4%和91.6%的分离菌被抑制)的活性与美罗培南和哌拉西林-他唑巴坦相当(79.2%敏感)。总之,头孢吡肟-他唑巴坦对[具体菌种未提及]和[具体菌种未提及]菌株具有高活性,包括ESBL筛选阳性表型[具体菌种未提及]菌株和对头孢他啶不敏感的[具体菌种未提及]菌属。这些结果支持头孢吡肟-他唑巴坦联合用药的进一步临床开发。

相似文献

4
Activity of Cefepime-Enmetazobactam against Gram-Negative Isolates Collected from U.S. and European Hospitals during 2014-2015.
Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2019 Jun 24;63(7). doi: 10.1128/AAC.00514-19. Print 2019 Jul.
8
Antimicrobial activity of ceftazidime-avibactam against Gram-negative organisms collected from U.S. medical centers in 2012.
Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2014;58(3):1684-92. doi: 10.1128/AAC.02429-13. Epub 2013 Dec 30.

引用本文的文献

2
β-Lactam Resistance in ESKAPE Pathogens Mediated Through Modifications in Penicillin-Binding Proteins: An Overview.
Infect Dis Ther. 2023 Mar;12(3):829-841. doi: 10.1007/s40121-023-00771-8. Epub 2023 Mar 6.
3
Biochemical exploration of β-lactamase inhibitors.
Front Genet. 2023 Jan 17;13:1060736. doi: 10.3389/fgene.2022.1060736. eCollection 2022.
4
Microbial Resistance to Antibiotics and Effective Antibiotherapy.
Biomedicines. 2022 May 12;10(5):1121. doi: 10.3390/biomedicines10051121.
6
New β-Lactam-β-Lactamase Inhibitor Combinations.
Clin Microbiol Rev. 2020 Nov 11;34(1). doi: 10.1128/CMR.00115-20. Print 2020 Dec 16.
10
Epidemiology and Diagnostics of Carbapenem Resistance in Gram-negative Bacteria.
Clin Infect Dis. 2019 Nov 13;69(Suppl 7):S521-S528. doi: 10.1093/cid/ciz824.

本文引用的文献

1
Evaluating outcomes of alternative dosing strategies for cefepime: a qualitative systematic review.
Ann Pharmacother. 2015 Mar;49(3):311-22. doi: 10.1177/1060028014564179. Epub 2015 Jan 9.
7
Meta-analysis of a possible signal of increased mortality associated with cefepime use.
Clin Infect Dis. 2010 Aug 15;51(4):381-9. doi: 10.1086/655131.
8
Cefepime: a reappraisal in an era of increasing antimicrobial resistance.
Expert Rev Anti Infect Ther. 2008 Dec;6(6):805-24. doi: 10.1586/14787210.6.6.805.
9
Pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic rationale for cefepime dosing regimens in intensive care units.
J Antimicrob Chemother. 2006 Nov;58(5):987-93. doi: 10.1093/jac/dkl349. Epub 2006 Aug 30.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验