Andrews J C, Williams D M, Cho K J, Knol J A, Wahl R L, Ensminger W D
Department of Radiology, University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor 48109-0030.
Radiology. 1989 Dec;173(3):779-81. doi: 10.1148/radiology.173.3.2813786.
Thirty-five patients with scintigrams showing unsatisfactory hepatic artery perfusion after surgical placement of an implanted pump and catheter system were examined with selective angiography (33 cases) or digital subtraction angiography (DSA) during which the contrast material was injected through the side port of the pump (six cases). In 34 of 35 cases, the cause of the unsatisfactory (either extrahepatic or incomplete) hepatic perfusion was defined. DSA was definitive in only two cases, in which extrahepatic flow through collateral vessels was demonstrated. The cause of the perfusion defect was hepatic artery thrombosis in 14 cases, extrahepatic flow through collateral vessels in 14 cases, a misplaced catheter in four cases, and a short proper hepatic artery without adequate length for mixing in two cases. Although hepatic artery perfusion scintigraphy is the primary tool for evaluation of hepatic perfusion after catheter placement, angiography plays an important role in treating the subset of patients with unsatisfactory hepatic perfusion.
35例患者在植入式泵和导管系统手术放置后,闪烁扫描显示肝动脉灌注不理想,其中33例接受了选择性血管造影检查,6例在通过泵的侧端口注入造影剂期间接受了数字减影血管造影(DSA)检查。在35例中的34例中,明确了肝灌注不理想(肝外或不完全)的原因。DSA仅在2例中具有决定性作用,这2例显示了通过侧支血管的肝外血流。灌注缺损的原因是肝动脉血栓形成14例,通过侧支血管的肝外血流14例,导管位置不当4例,以及肝固有动脉短且长度不足以进行混合2例。尽管肝动脉灌注闪烁扫描是评估导管放置后肝灌注的主要工具,但血管造影在治疗肝灌注不理想的患者亚组中起着重要作用。