Hearps Stephen J C, Takagi Michael, Babl Franz E, Bressan Silvia, Truss Katherine, Davis Gavin A, Godfrey Celia, Clarke Cathriona, Doyle Melissa, Rausa Vanessa, Dunne Kevin, Anderson Vicki
Murdoch Childrens Research Institute, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
Melbourne School of Psychological Sciences and.
Pediatrics. 2017 Feb;139(2). doi: 10.1542/peds.2016-2003.
A reliable, developmentally appropriate and standardized method for assessing postconcussive symptoms (PCS) is essential to accurately determine recovery postconcussion and to effectively manage return to normal activities. The aim of this study was to develop an evidence-based, psychometrically validated approach to determining clinically useful cutoff scores by using a commonly administered PCS measure.
The current study was a prospective, longitudinal observational study conducted between July 2013 and November of 2015 at a statewide tertiary pediatric hospital. Participants were 120 children (5-18 years of age) presenting to the emergency department with a concussion within 48 hours of injury. PCS were assessed by using the Postconcussion Symptom Inventory (PCSI), acutely, 1 to 4 days postinjury and 2 weeks postinjury. Using comprehensive clinical assessment as gold standard, we assessed the clinical cutoff discrimination ability of PCSI at 2 weeks postinjury by using published approaches, and then varying each approach to optimize their discrimination ability.
Existing and potential clinical cutoff scores were explored in predicting delayed recovery. Receiver operating characteristic curve results returned acceptable discrimination and sensitivity when PCSI items increased in severity from preinjury by 1 or more. Compared with a published cutoff score being 3+ items with increased severity, the current study suggests a more stringent cutoff requirement of 2+ is better able to accurately classify symptomatic children.
This study provides the first validated index (2+ items, 1+ severity) of concussion recovery for children and youth. Further studies in more varied samples are needed to establish the effectiveness of this method.
一种可靠、适合发育阶段且标准化的评估脑震荡后症状(PCS)的方法对于准确确定脑震荡后的恢复情况以及有效管理恢复正常活动至关重要。本研究的目的是通过使用一种常用的PCS测量方法,开发一种基于证据、经过心理测量学验证的方法来确定临床有用的临界分数。
本研究是一项前瞻性纵向观察性研究,于2013年7月至2015年11月在一家全州范围的三级儿科医院进行。参与者为120名儿童(5 - 18岁),他们在受伤后48小时内到急诊科就诊,被诊断为脑震荡。使用脑震荡后症状量表(PCSI)在受伤后急性、伤后1至4天以及伤后2周对PCS进行评估。以全面临床评估作为金标准,我们采用已发表的方法评估伤后2周时PCSI的临床临界判别能力,然后对每种方法进行调整以优化其判别能力。
探讨了现有的和潜在的临床临界分数在预测延迟恢复方面的情况。当PCSI项目严重程度较伤前增加1个及以上时,受试者工作特征曲线结果显示出可接受的判别能力和敏感性。与已发表的临界分数为3个及以上严重程度增加的项目相比,本研究表明更为严格的临界要求为2个及以上能更好地准确分类有症状的儿童。
本研究为儿童和青少年提供了首个经过验证的脑震荡恢复指标(2个及以上项目,1个及以上严重程度)。需要在更多样化的样本中进行进一步研究以确定该方法的有效性。