School of Physical and Occupational Therapy, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.
Department of Pediatrics, Montreal Children's Hospital, McGill University Health Center, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.
Pediatrics. 2020 Jul;146(1). doi: 10.1542/peds.2019-2317. Epub 2020 Jun 4.
To evaluate parent-child agreement on postconcussion symptom severity within 48 hours of injury and examine the comparative predictive power of a clinical prediction rule when using parent or child symptom reporting.
Both patients and parents quantified preinjury and current symptoms using the Postconcussion Symptom Inventory (PCSI) in the pediatric emergency department. Two-way mixed, absolute measure intraclass correlation coefficients were calculated to evaluate the agreement between patient and parent reports. A multiple logistic regression was run with 9 items to determine the predictive power of the Predicting and Preventing Postconcussive Problems in Pediatrics clinical prediction rule when using the child-reported PCSI. Delong's receiver operating characteristic curve analysis was used to compare the area under the curve (AUC) for the child-report models versus previously published parent-report models.
Overall parent-child agreement for the total PCSI score was fair (intraclass correlation coefficient = 0.66). Parent-child agreement was greater for (1) postinjury (versus preinjury) ratings, (2) physical (versus emotional) symptoms, and (3) older (versus younger) children. Applying the clinical prediction rule by using the child-reported PCSI maintained similar predictive power to parent-reported PCSI (child AUC = 0.70 [95% confidence interval: 0.67-0.72]; parent AUC = 0.71 [95% confidence interval: 0.68-0.74]; = .23).
Overall parent-child agreement on postconcussion symptoms is fair but varies according to several factors. The findings for physical symptoms and the clinical prediction rule have high agreement; information in these domains are likely to be similar regardless of whether they are provided by either the parent or child. Younger children and emotional symptoms show poorer agreement; interviewing both the child and the parent would provide more comprehensive information in these instances.
评估伤后 48 小时内父母与子女对脑震荡后症状严重程度的一致性,并检验使用父母或子女报告症状时临床预测规则的比较预测能力。
在儿科急诊室,患者和父母均使用《脑震荡后症状清单》(Postconcussion Symptom Inventory,PCSI)对受伤前和当前症状进行量化。采用双向混合、绝对测量组内相关系数来评估患者和父母报告之间的一致性。使用多逻辑回归对 9 项预测和预防儿科脑震荡后问题临床预测规则进行分析,以确定使用儿童报告的 PCSI 时该预测规则的预测能力。Delong 接受者操作特征曲线分析用于比较儿童报告模型与先前发表的父母报告模型的曲线下面积(area under the curve,AUC)。
总的来说,PCS 总分的父母与子女一致性为中等(组内相关系数=0.66)。(1)伤后(而非伤前)评分、(2)身体(而非情绪)症状和(3)年龄较大(而非较小)的儿童,父母与子女的一致性更高。使用儿童报告的 PCSI 应用临床预测规则,对父母报告的 PCSI 具有相似的预测能力(儿童 AUC=0.70[95%置信区间:0.67-0.72];父母 AUC=0.71[95%置信区间:0.68-0.74];=0.23)。
父母与子女对脑震荡后症状的总体一致性为中等,但受多种因素影响。身体症状和临床预测规则的一致性较高;这些领域的信息无论由父母还是孩子提供,都可能是相似的。年龄较小的儿童和情绪症状的一致性较差;在这些情况下,同时访谈儿童和父母可以提供更全面的信息。