School of Biosciences, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria, 3010, Australia.
Unité de Mathématiques et Informatique Appliquées (MIAT), Toulouse INRA, Auzeville, BP 52627 31326 Cedex, France.
Ecol Appl. 2017 Jun;27(4):1210-1222. doi: 10.1002/eap.1515. Epub 2017 Apr 19.
Adaptive management is widely advocated to improve environmental management. Derivations of optimal strategies for adaptive management, however, tend to be case specific and time consuming. In contrast, managers might seek relatively simple guidance, such as insight into when a new potential management action should be considered, and how much effort should be expended on trialing such an action. We constructed a two-time-step scenario where a manager is choosing between two possible management actions. The manager has a total budget that can be split between a learning phase and an implementation phase. We use this scenario to investigate when and how much a manager should invest in learning about the management actions available. The optimal investment in learning can be understood intuitively by accounting for the expected value of sample information, the benefits that accrue during learning, the direct costs of learning, and the opportunity costs of learning. We find that the optimal proportion of the budget to spend on learning is characterized by several critical thresholds that mark a jump from spending a large proportion of the budget on learning to spending nothing. For example, as sampling variance increases, it is optimal to spend a larger proportion of the budget on learning, up to a point: if the sampling variance passes a critical threshold, it is no longer beneficial to invest in learning. Similar thresholds are observed as a function of the total budget and the difference in the expected performance of the two actions. We illustrate how this model can be applied using a case study of choosing between alternative rearing diets for hihi, an endangered New Zealand passerine. Although the model presented is a simplified scenario, we believe it is relevant to many management situations. Managers often have relatively short time horizons for management, and might be reluctant to consider further investment in learning and monitoring beyond collecting data from a single time period.
自适应管理被广泛提倡用于改善环境管理。然而,自适应管理的最优策略推导往往是特定于案例且耗时的。相比之下,管理者可能会寻求相对简单的指导,例如了解何时应考虑新的潜在管理行动,以及应在尝试此类行动上投入多少努力。我们构建了一个两阶段情景,其中管理者在两种可能的管理行动之间进行选择。管理者有一个总预算,可以在学习阶段和实施阶段之间分配。我们使用这种情景来研究管理者应该在何时以及在多大程度上投资于了解可用的管理行动。通过考虑样本信息的预期价值、学习期间获得的收益、学习的直接成本和学习的机会成本,可以直观地理解学习的最优投资。我们发现,学习的最优预算比例由几个关键阈值来描述,这些阈值标志着从花费大部分预算用于学习到不花费任何预算的跳跃。例如,随着采样方差的增加,最优的是将预算的较大比例用于学习,直到达到一个点:如果采样方差超过一个关键阈值,则投资学习就不再有益。随着总预算和两个行动预期绩效之间的差异的变化,也可以观察到类似的阈值。我们通过一个选择替代饲养饲料的案例研究来展示如何应用这个模型,这个案例研究涉及一种濒危的新西兰雀形目鸟类 hihi。虽然提出的模型是一个简化的情景,但我们相信它与许多管理情况相关。管理者通常对管理的时间范围相对较短,并且可能不愿意在收集单个时间段的数据之外考虑进一步的学习和监测投资。