Vasiliadis Haris S, Tsikopoulos Konstantinos
Haris S Vasiliadis, Orthopaedie Sonnenhof, 3006 Bern, Switzerland.
World J Orthop. 2017 Jan 18;8(1):1-11. doi: 10.5312/wjo.v8.i1.1.
The prevalence of primary or idiopathic osteoarthritis (OA) of knee and hip joints has substantially increased in general population during the last decades. Analgesics and non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs are currently extensively used as non-surgical treatment options. However, they act as symptomatic treatments, not offering a cure of OA and they are accused for an increased risk of adverse events. Glucosamine (GL) and chondroitin (CH) are nutritional supplements that have recently gained widespread use as treatment options for OA. They potentially or theoretically act as chondroprotectors or/and as "disease-modifying OA drugs" offering not only symptomatic relief but also alteration of the natural history of OA. However, although many studies have showed a significant treatment effect, accompanied with remarkable safety, there is still controversy regarding their relative effectiveness compared with placebo or other treatments. The scope of this review is to present and critically evaluate the current evidence-based information regarding the administration of GL and CH for the treatment of knee or hip OA. Our focus is to investigate the clinical efficacy and safety after the use of these supplements. An effect of GL and CH on both clinical and radiological findings has been shown. However, only a few high-quality level I trials exist in the literature, especially on the assessment of radiological progression of OA. The effect sizes are generally small and probably not clinically relevant. Even the validity of these results is limited by the high risk of bias introduced in the studies. Both GL and CH seem to be safe with no serious adverse events reported. There is currently no convincing information for the efficacy of GL and CH on OA.
在过去几十年中,膝关节和髋关节原发性或特发性骨关节炎(OA)在普通人群中的患病率大幅上升。目前,镇痛药和非甾体类抗炎药被广泛用作非手术治疗选择。然而,它们只是对症治疗,无法治愈骨关节炎,而且还被指责会增加不良事件的风险。氨基葡萄糖(GL)和软骨素(CH)是营养补充剂,最近作为骨关节炎的治疗选择而广泛使用。它们在潜在或理论上可作为软骨保护剂或/和“改善病情的骨关节炎药物”,不仅能缓解症状,还能改变骨关节炎的自然病程。然而,尽管许多研究显示出显著的治疗效果且安全性良好,但与安慰剂或其他治疗相比,它们的相对有效性仍存在争议。本综述的目的是展示并批判性地评估当前关于使用氨基葡萄糖和软骨素治疗膝关节或髋关节骨关节炎的循证信息。我们的重点是研究使用这些补充剂后的临床疗效和安全性。氨基葡萄糖和软骨素对临床和影像学结果均有影响。然而,文献中仅有少数高质量的I级试验,特别是关于骨关节炎影像学进展的评估。效应量通常较小,可能与临床无关。即使这些结果的有效性也受到研究所引入的高偏倚风险的限制。氨基葡萄糖和软骨素似乎都很安全,没有严重不良事件的报告。目前尚无令人信服的信息表明氨基葡萄糖和软骨素对骨关节炎有效。