Suppr超能文献

S-腺苷甲硫氨酸转甲状腺素蛋白预测急性静脉血栓栓塞症患者的抗凝质量:MAQI研究经验

SAMe-TTR predicts quality of anticoagulation in patients with acute venous thromboembolism: The MAQI experience.

作者信息

Kataruka Akash, Kong Xiaowen, Haymart Brian, Kline-Rogers Eva, Almany Steve, Kozlowski Jay, Krol Gregory D, Kaatz Scott, McNamara Michael W, Froehlich James B, Barnes Geoffrey D

机构信息

1 Department of Internal Medicine, University of Michigan Health System, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.

2 Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, University of Michigan Health System, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.

出版信息

Vasc Med. 2017 Jun;22(3):197-203. doi: 10.1177/1358863X16682863. Epub 2017 Feb 1.

Abstract

A high SAMe-TTR score predicted poor warfarin control and adverse events among atrial fibrillation patients. However, the SAMe-TTR score has not been well validated in venous thromboembolism (VTE) patients. A cohort of 1943 warfarin-treated patients with acute VTE was analyzed to correlate the SAMe-TTR score with time in therapeutic range (TTR) and clinical adverse events. A TTR <60% was more frequent among patients with a high (>2) versus low (0-1) SAMe-TTR score (63.4% vs 52.3%, p<0.0001). A high SAMe-TTR score (>2) correlated with increased overall adverse events (7.9 vs 4.5 overall adverse events/100 patient years, p=0.002), driven primarily by increased recurrent VTE rates (4.2 vs 1.5 recurrent VTE/100 patient years, p=0.0003). The SAMe-TTR score had a modest predictive ability for international normalized ratio (INR) quality and adverse clinical events among warfarin-treated VTE patients. The utility of the SAMe-TTR score to guide clinical decision-making remains to be investigated.

摘要

高SAm e - TTR评分预示心房颤动患者华法林控制不佳及不良事件。然而,SAm e - TTR评分在静脉血栓栓塞(VTE)患者中尚未得到充分验证。对1943例接受华法林治疗的急性VTE患者队列进行分析,以关联SAm e - TTR评分与治疗范围内时间(TTR)及临床不良事件。SAm e - TTR评分高(>2)的患者中TTR<60%比评分低(0 - 1)的患者更常见(63.4%对52.3%,p<0.0001)。高SAm e - TTR评分(>2)与总体不良事件增加相关(每100患者年7.9次对4.5次总体不良事件,p = 0.002),主要由复发性VTE发生率增加驱动(每100患者年4.2次对1.5次复发性VTE,p = 0.0003)。SAm e - TTR评分对华法林治疗的VTE患者的国际标准化比值(INR)质量和不良临床事件具有适度的预测能力。SAm e - TTR评分指导临床决策的效用仍有待研究。

相似文献

引用本文的文献

本文引用的文献

7
National Trends in Ambulatory Oral Anticoagulant Use.门诊口服抗凝剂使用的全国趋势。
Am J Med. 2015 Dec;128(12):1300-5.e2. doi: 10.1016/j.amjmed.2015.05.044. Epub 2015 Jul 2.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验