• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

使用即时护理眼部超声技术在儿童中识别视神经肿胀

Identification of Optic Nerve Swelling Using Point-of-Care Ocular Ultrasound in Children.

作者信息

Marchese Ronald F, Mistry Rakesh D, Binenbaum Gil, Liu Grant T, Scarfone Richard J, Woodford Ashley L, Chen Aaron E

机构信息

Emergency Medicine, Children's Hospital Colorado, Aurora, CO.

Ophthalmology and.

出版信息

Pediatr Emerg Care. 2018 Aug;34(8):531-536. doi: 10.1097/PEC.0000000000001046.

DOI:10.1097/PEC.0000000000001046
PMID:28146012
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to determine the feasibility and accuracy of point-of-care (POC) ocular ultrasound (US) when performed by a pediatric emergency medicine (PEM) physician to detect optic nerve abnormalities concerning for swelling, as compared with the fundus examination performed by an ophthalmologist.

METHODS

This was a single-center, prospective cohort pilot study of children aged 12 months to 18 years who required optic disc evaluation by an ophthalmologist. Eligible subjects were enrolled from the emergency department, inpatient wards, and neuro-ophthalmology outpatient clinic of an urban, tertiary care children's hospital. Point-of-care ocular US, specifically assessing optic nerve sheath diameter and optic disc elevation, was performed. Findings on US were compared with findings identified by an ophthalmologist on dilated fundus examination.

RESULTS

Seventy-six subjects were enrolled; 20 (26%) of 76 had findings concerning for optic nerve swelling diagnosed by an ophthalmologist on fundus examination. Using a sonographic definition for optic nerve swelling of optic nerve sheath diameter greater than 4.5 mm or the presence of optic disc elevation, the sensitivity and specificity were 90% and 55%, respectively. The success rate of POC ocular US was 100%, and the mean time to completion was 8 minutes. For emergency department subjects in whom direct fundus examination was attempted, the PEM physician could visualize the optic disc and assess for swelling in only 40% (14/35) of examinations.

CONCLUSIONS

The results of our study suggest that POC ocular US performed by PEM physicians was feasible and determined to be sensitive but nonspecific in the detection of optic nerve swelling. Additional larger studies may determine generalizability to other nonophthalmologist physicians performing POC ocular US.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在确定儿科急诊医学(PEM)医生进行的即时护理(POC)眼部超声(US)检测视神经肿胀相关异常的可行性和准确性,并与眼科医生进行的眼底检查相比较。

方法

这是一项针对12个月至18岁需要眼科医生对视盘进行评估的儿童的单中心前瞻性队列试点研究。符合条件的受试者从一家城市三级儿童医院的急诊科、住院病房和神经眼科门诊招募。进行了即时护理眼部超声检查,特别评估视神经鞘直径和视盘抬高情况。将超声检查结果与眼科医生在散瞳眼底检查中发现的结果进行比较。

结果

共招募了76名受试者;76名中的20名(26%)经眼科医生眼底检查诊断为视神经肿胀相关异常。采用视神经鞘直径大于4.5mm或存在视盘抬高作为视神经肿胀的超声定义,敏感性和特异性分别为90%和55%。即时护理眼部超声的成功率为100%,平均完成时间为8分钟。对于尝试进行直接眼底检查的急诊科受试者,PEM医生在仅40%(14/35)的检查中能够可视化视盘并评估肿胀情况。

结论

我们的研究结果表明,PEM医生进行的即时护理眼部超声在检测视神经肿胀方面是可行的,且被确定为敏感但非特异性。更多更大规模的研究可能会确定其对其他进行即时护理眼部超声的非眼科医生的可推广性。

相似文献

1
Identification of Optic Nerve Swelling Using Point-of-Care Ocular Ultrasound in Children.使用即时护理眼部超声技术在儿童中识别视神经肿胀
Pediatr Emerg Care. 2018 Aug;34(8):531-536. doi: 10.1097/PEC.0000000000001046.
2
Point-of-care ocular ultrasound to detect optic disc swelling.即时眼部超声检查以检测视盘肿胀。
Acad Emerg Med. 2013 Sep;20(9):920-5. doi: 10.1111/acem.12206.
3
Bedside sonographic measurement of optic nerve sheath diameter as a predictor of increased intracranial pressure in children.床边超声测量视神经鞘直径作为儿童颅内压升高的预测指标
Ann Emerg Med. 2009 Jun;53(6):785-91. doi: 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2008.11.025. Epub 2009 Jan 23.
4
Identification of optic disc elevation and the crescent sign using point-of-care ocular ultrasound in children.使用即时眼部超声识别儿童视盘隆起和新月征。
Pediatr Emerg Care. 2015 Apr;31(4):304-7. doi: 10.1097/PEC.0000000000000408.
5
Ocular ultrasound for monitoring pseudotumor cerebri syndrome.眼部超声在监测假性脑瘤综合征中的应用。
J Neurol. 2018 Feb;265(2):356-361. doi: 10.1007/s00415-017-8699-1. Epub 2017 Dec 14.
6
Pediatric point-of-care ultrasound of optic disc elevation for increased intracranial pressure: A pilot study.小儿视神经盘抬高症颅内压增高的即时超声检查: 一项初步研究。
Am J Emerg Med. 2021 Nov;49:18-23. doi: 10.1016/j.ajem.2021.05.051. Epub 2021 May 21.
7
Novice emergency physician ultrasonography of optic nerve sheath diameter compared to ophthalmologist fundoscopic evaluation for papilledema.新手急诊医生对视神经鞘直径进行超声检查与眼科医生通过眼底镜检查评估视乳头水肿的比较。
J Am Coll Emerg Physicians Open. 2021 Jan 4;2(1):e12355. doi: 10.1002/emp2.12355. eCollection 2021 Feb.
8
Point-of-care ultrasonography for the identification of 2 children with optic disc drusen mimicking papilledema.床旁超声检查用于识别2例表现为视乳头水肿的视盘玻璃膜疣患儿。
Pediatr Emerg Care. 2014 Jul;30(7):505-7. doi: 10.1097/PEC.0000000000000172.
9
Can ocular ultrasound predict intracranial hypertension? A pilot diagnostic accuracy evaluation in a UK emergency department.眼超声能否预测颅内高压?英国急诊科的一项初步诊断准确性评估。
Eur J Emerg Med. 2013 Apr;20(2):91-7. doi: 10.1097/MEJ.0b013e32835105c8.
10
The efficacy of optic nerve ultrasonography for differentiating papilloedema from pseudopapilloedema in eyes with swollen optic discs.视神经超声检查在鉴别视盘肿胀伴视乳头水肿与假性视乳头水肿中的效果。
Acta Ophthalmol. 2013 Jun;91(4):376-80. doi: 10.1111/j.1755-3768.2011.02253.x. Epub 2011 Sep 22.

引用本文的文献

1
Investigation of Optic Nerve Sheath Diameter, Intraocular Pressure, and Dry Eye in Patients with Borderline Personality Disorder: The Role of Childhood Trauma.边缘型人格障碍患者的视神经鞘直径、眼压和干眼情况调查:童年创伤的作用
J Clin Med. 2025 Aug 20;14(16):5886. doi: 10.3390/jcm14165886.
2
Ultrasound detected increase in optic disk height to identify elevated intracranial pressure: a systematic review.超声检测视盘高度增加以识别颅内压升高:一项系统评价
Ultrasound J. 2023 May 25;15(1):26. doi: 10.1186/s13089-023-00324-7.
3
Optic Nerve Ultrasound Evaluation in Children: A Review.
儿童视神经超声评估:综述
Diagnostics (Basel). 2023 Feb 1;13(3):535. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics13030535.