Stammet Pascal
Department of Anesthesia and Intensive Care Medicine, Centre Hospitalier de Luxembourg, Luxembourg.
Semin Neurol. 2017 Feb;37(1):75-80. doi: 10.1055/s-0036-1593858. Epub 2017 Feb 1.
Biomarkers are part of the recommended outcome predictors after cardiac arrest. In general, blood biomarkers can easily be performed as routine laboratory tests, and they are unaffected by sedation, but bear the potential risk of laboratory errors. Nonetheless, if used properly, with the potential limitations in mind, they certainly help predict outcome after cardiac arrest. Among the routinely used and available blood biomarkers, neuron-specific enolase (NSE) has the best predictive value for poor outcome if measured serially from 24 to 72 hours. Cutoff values should be taken with caution because there is no 100% specificity (0% false-positive rate) in clinical practice. Rather, the increase over time of high NSE values is predictive of poor outcome. Other biomarkers like protein S100 and inflammatory markers also bear a potential to predict outcome, but they are outperformed by NSE. New blood biomarkers are currently under investigation and might improve the accuracy of outcome prediction. The family of noncoding RNAs, including microRNAs, is probably the most promising as microRNAs are not only associated with outcome, but also have the potential for therapeutic implications through their mechanism of action.
生物标志物是心脏骤停后推荐的预后预测指标的一部分。一般来说,血液生物标志物作为常规实验室检查很容易进行,且不受镇静影响,但存在实验室误差的潜在风险。尽管如此,如果正确使用并考虑到潜在局限性,它们肯定有助于预测心脏骤停后的预后。在常规使用且可得的血液生物标志物中,如果在24至72小时内连续测量,神经元特异性烯醇化酶(NSE)对不良预后的预测价值最佳。由于临床实践中不存在100%的特异性(0%的假阳性率),因此应谨慎采用临界值。相反,高NSE值随时间的升高预示着不良预后。其他生物标志物如蛋白S100和炎症标志物也有预测预后的潜力,但它们的表现不如NSE。目前正在研究新的血液生物标志物,可能会提高预后预测的准确性。包括微小RNA在内的非编码RNA家族可能是最有前景的,因为微小RNA不仅与预后相关,还通过其作用机制具有治疗意义。