Fortunato Angelo, Boddy Amy, Mallo Diego, Aktipis Athena, Maley Carlo C, Pepper John W
Biodesign Center for Personalized Diagnostics, and School of Life Sciences, Arizona State University, Tempe, Arizona 85287.
Department of Psychology, Arizona State University, Tempe, Arizona 85287.
Cold Spring Harb Perspect Med. 2017 Feb 1;7(2):a029652. doi: 10.1101/cshperspect.a029652.
Evolution by natural selection is the conceptual foundation for nearly every branch of biology and increasingly also for biomedicine and medical research. In cancer biology, evolution explains how populations of cells in tumors change over time. It is a fundamental question whether this evolutionary process is driven primarily by natural selection and adaptation or by other evolutionary processes such as founder effects and drift. In cancer biology, as in organismal evolutionary biology, there is controversy about this question and also about the use of adaptation through natural selection as a guiding framework for research. In this review, we discuss the differences and similarities between evolution among somatic cells versus evolution among organisms. We review what is known about the parameters and rate of evolution in neoplasms, as well as evidence for adaptation. We conclude that adaptation is a useful framework that accurately explains the defining characteristics of cancer. Further, convergent evolution through natural selection provides the only satisfying explanation both for how a group of diverse pathologies have enough in common to usefully share the descriptive label of "cancer" and for why this convergent condition becomes life-threatening.
自然选择驱动的进化是几乎所有生物学分支的概念基础,在生物医学和医学研究领域的重要性也日益凸显。在癌症生物学中,进化解释了肿瘤细胞群体如何随时间变化。一个基本问题是,这种进化过程主要是由自然选择和适应驱动,还是由其他进化过程(如奠基者效应和遗传漂变)驱动。在癌症生物学中,如同在生物体进化生物学中一样,对于这个问题以及将通过自然选择实现的适应作为研究指导框架的应用存在争议。在本综述中,我们讨论了体细胞进化与生物体进化之间的异同。我们回顾了关于肿瘤进化的参数和速率的已知情况,以及适应的证据。我们得出结论,适应是一个有用的框架,能够准确解释癌症的定义特征。此外,通过自然选择的趋同进化为一组多样的病理状况为何有足够的共同之处从而能够有效地共享“癌症”这一描述性标签,以及为何这种趋同状况会危及生命,提供了唯一令人满意的解释。