State Key Laboratory of Biocontrol, College of Ecology and Evolution, Sun Yat-Sen University, Guangzhou 510275, China; email:
CAS Key Laboratory of Genomic and Precision Medicine, Beijing Institute of Genomics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100101, China; email:
Annu Rev Genet. 2016 Nov 23;50:347-369. doi: 10.1146/annurev-genet-112414-054842. Epub 2016 Sep 28.
Although tumorigenesis has been accepted as an evolutionary process ( 20 , 102 ), many forces may operate differently in cancers than in organisms, as they evolve at vastly different time scales. Among such forces, natural selection, here defined as differential cellular proliferation among distinct somatic cell genotypes, is particularly interesting because its action might be thwarted in multicellular organisms ( 20 , 29 ). In this review, selection is analyzed in two stages of cancer evolution: Stage I is the evolution between tumors and normal tissues, and Stage II is the evolution within tumors. The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) data show a low degree of convergent evolution in Stage I, where genetic changes are not extensively shared among cases. An equally important, albeit much less highlighted, discovery using TCGA data is that there is almost no net selection in cancer evolution. Both positive and negative selection are evident but they neatly cancel each other out, rendering total selection ineffective in the absence of recombination. The efficacy of selection is even lower in Stage II, where neutral (non-Darwinian) evolution is increasingly supported by high-density sampling studies ( 81 , 123 ). Because natural selection is not a strong deterministic force, cancers usually evolve divergently even in similar tissue environments.
尽管肿瘤发生已被认为是一个进化过程(20,102),但许多力量在癌症中可能与在生物体中的作用不同,因为它们在截然不同的时间尺度上进化。在这些力量中,自然选择(这里定义为不同体细胞基因型之间的差异细胞增殖)特别有趣,因为它的作用可能在多细胞生物中受到阻碍(20,29)。在这篇综述中,选择在癌症进化的两个阶段进行分析:第一阶段是肿瘤与正常组织之间的进化,第二阶段是肿瘤内的进化。癌症基因组图谱(TCGA)数据显示,在第一阶段(I 期)的进化中,遗传变化在病例之间并没有广泛共享,趋同进化的程度较低。同样重要的是,尽管使用 TCGA 数据的发现没有得到充分强调,但在癌症进化中几乎没有净选择。正选择和负选择都很明显,但它们相互抵消,使得在没有重组的情况下选择完全无效。在第二阶段(II 期),选择的效果甚至更低,高密度采样研究越来越支持中性(非达尔文主义)进化(81,123)。由于自然选择不是一种强大的决定性力量,因此即使在相似的组织环境中,癌症通常也会朝着不同的方向进化。