文献检索文档翻译深度研究
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
邀请有礼套餐&价格历史记录

新学期,新优惠

限时优惠:9月1日-9月22日

30天高级会员仅需29元

1天体验卡首发特惠仅需5.99元

了解详情
不再提醒
插件&应用
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
高级版
套餐订阅购买积分包
AI 工具
文献检索文档翻译深度研究
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2025

Validation of the English language Forgotten Joint Score-12 as an outcome measure for total hip and knee arthroplasty in a British population.

作者信息

Hamilton D F, Loth F L, Giesinger J M, Giesinger K, MacDonald D J, Patton J T, Simpson A H R W, Howie C R

机构信息

University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK.

Medical University of Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria.

出版信息

Bone Joint J. 2017 Feb;99-B(2):218-224. doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.99B2.BJJ-2016-0606.R1.


DOI:10.1302/0301-620X.99B2.BJJ-2016-0606.R1
PMID:28148664
Abstract

AIMS: To validate the English language Forgotten Joint Score-12 (FJS-12) as a tool to evaluate the outcome of hip and knee arthroplasty in a United Kingdom population. PATIENTS AND METHODS: All patients undergoing surgery between January and August 2014 were eligible for inclusion. Prospective data were collected from 205 patients undergoing total hip arthroplasty (THA) and 231 patients undergoing total knee arthroplasty (TKA). Outcomes were assessed with the FJS-12 and the Oxford Hip and Knee Scores (OHS, OKS) pre-operatively, then at six and 12 months post-operatively. Internal consistency, convergent validity, effect size, relative validity and ceiling effects were determined. RESULTS: Data for the TKA and THA patients showed high internal consistency for the FJS-12 (Cronbach α = 0.97 in TKAs, 0.98 in THAs). Convergent validity with the Oxford Scores was high (r = 0.85 in TKAs, r = 0.79 for THAs). From six to 12 months, the change was higher for the FJS-12 than for the OHS in THA patients (effect size d = 0.21 versus -0.03). Ceiling effects at one-year follow-up were low for the FJS-12 with just 3.9% (TKA) and 8.8% (THA) of patients achieving the best possible score. CONCLUSION: The FJS-12 has strong measurement properties in terms of validity, internal consistency and sensitivity to change in TKA and THA patients. Low ceiling effects and good relative validity allow the monitoring of longer term outcomes, particularly in well-performing groups after total joint arthroplasty. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2017;99-B:218-24.

摘要

相似文献

[1]
Validation of the English language Forgotten Joint Score-12 as an outcome measure for total hip and knee arthroplasty in a British population.

Bone Joint J. 2017-2

[2]
Translation, cross-cultural adaptation, and validation of the Italian language Forgotten Joint Score-12 (FJS-12) as an outcome measure for total knee arthroplasty in an Italian population.

BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2020-1-11

[3]
Joint awareness in osteoarthritis of the hip and knee evaluated with the 'Forgotten Joint' Score before and after joint replacement.

Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2016-10

[4]
'Worse than death' and waiting for a joint arthroplasty.

Bone Joint J. 2019-8

[5]
Single-item satisfaction scores mask large variations in pain, function and joint awareness in patients following total joint arthroplasty.

Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol. 2020-2

[6]
Does knee awareness differ between different knee arthroplasty prostheses? A matched, case-control, cross-sectional study.

BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2016-4-1

[7]
Patients' pre-operative general and specific outcome expectations predict postoperative pain and function after total knee and total hip arthroplasties.

Scand J Pain. 2018-7-26

[8]
The Dutch version of the Forgotten Joint Score: test-retesting reliability and validation.

Acta Orthop Belg. 2016-3

[9]
Results of total joint arthroplasty and joint preserving surgery in younger patients evaluated by alternative outcome measures.

Dan Med J. 2014-4

[10]
Evaluation of Forgotten Joint Score in total hip arthroplasty with Oxford Hip Score as reference standard.

Acta Orthop. 2019-4-1

引用本文的文献

[1]
Young Hip: an exploration into young patients' (aged < 50 years) expectations following primary total hip arthroplasty : a qualitative study.

Bone Jt Open. 2025-7-14

[2]
Do patient-reported outcome scores better identify outlier surgical practice compared with revision rates for total knee arthroplasty?

Acta Orthop. 2025-6-25

[3]
Statistical analysis plan for the Robotic-Assisted Surgery and Kinematic ALignment in total knee arthroplasty (RASKAL) registry-nested randomized trial.

Bone Jt Open. 2025-3-19

[4]
Psychometric properties of the Arabic version of the Forgotten Joint Score usage in total hip arthroplasty.

J Orthop Surg Res. 2025-1-28

[5]
Are Current Patient-Reported Outcome Measures Fit for Purpose to Evaluate Unicompartmental Knee Arthroplasty?

J Clin Med. 2025-1-2

[6]
Outcomes for Younger Patients with Femoral Neck Fractures.

J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2025-4-2

[7]
Longitudinal Evaluation Using the Forgotten Joint Score-12 for Double-Bundle Primary Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: A Retrospective Observational Study.

Cureus. 2024-9-30

[8]
Comparison of robotic-assisted total knee arthroplasty: an updated systematic review and meta-analysis.

J Robot Surg. 2024-7-25

[9]
Item-reduced Forgotten Joint Score provides adequate psychometric properties in ACLR patients.

J Exp Orthop. 2024-6-11

[10]
Systematic evaluation of the degree of joint amnesia in patients after total hip arthroplasty with direct anterior approach (DAA) compared with posterior approach (PA).

J Orthop Surg Res. 2024-1-5

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

推荐工具

医学文档翻译智能文献检索