Dimova Petia, de Palma Luca, Job-Chapron Anne-Sophie, Minotti Lorella, Hoffmann Dominique, Kahane Philippe
Epilepsy Surgery Unit, Department of Neurosurgery, St. Ivan Rilski University Hospital, Sofia, Bulgaria.
Epilepsy Unit, Neurology Department and GIN, INSERM U836, University Grenoble Alpes and Michallon Hospital, Grenoble, France.
Epilepsia. 2017 Mar;58(3):381-392. doi: 10.1111/epi.13663. Epub 2017 Feb 2.
To assess long-term outcome and identify prognostic factors of radiofrequency thermocoagulation (RFTC) following stereoelectroencephalography (SEEG) explorations in particularly complex cases of focal epilepsy.
We retrospectively reviewed the medical charts, video-SEEG recordings, and outcomes for 23 patients (aged 6-53 years) treated with SEEG-guided RFTC, of whom 15 had negative magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) findings, and 10 were considered noneligible for resective surgery after SEEG. Two to 11 RFTCs per patient (mean 5) were produced by applying 40-50 V, 75-110 mA current for 10-60 s on SEEG electrode contacts within the epileptogenic region, which was very close to eloquent cortices in 12 cases. The general features, SEEG findings, and RFTC extent of the patients were analyzed to extract potential preoperative predictors of post-RFTC seizure outcomes.
After a mean follow-up of 32 months (range 2-119 months), eight patients experienced a ≥50% decrease of seizure frequency after RFTC (R+, 34.8%), of whom one had a sustained seizure freedom and 15 patients did not benefit from RFTC (R-, 65.2%). The presence of an MRI lesion was the only significant predictor of a positive outcome, whereas location of epilepsy, extent of interictal epileptiform discharges (IEDs) and of the seizure onset zone, induction of seizures by electrical stimulation, as well as the ratio of the coagulated sites did not show a significant correlation to the RFTC response. However, (sub-)continuous IEDs were more frequently found in R+ than in R- patients, thus suggesting that this EEG marker of the epileptogenic tissue might predict a positive outcome even in patients without obvious MRI lesion.
Our study confirms that RFTC, although less effective than resective surgery, can be a reasonable therapeutic option in complex cases where anatomic constraints make impossible any cortical resection. Further prospective studies are needed to better define RFTC indications and to optimize its methodology.
评估立体定向脑电图(SEEG)探查后,在特别复杂的局灶性癫痫病例中行射频热凝术(RFTC)的长期疗效,并确定预后因素。
我们回顾性分析了23例(年龄6 - 53岁)接受SEEG引导下RFTC治疗患者的病历、视频SEEG记录及治疗结果,其中15例患者磁共振成像(MRI)检查结果为阴性,10例患者在SEEG检查后被认为不适合进行切除性手术。在致痫区域内的SEEG电极触点上,通过施加40 - 50V、75 - 110mA电流10 - 60秒,为每位患者进行2至11次RFTC治疗(平均5次),其中12例患者电极触点非常接近功能区皮质。分析患者的一般特征、SEEG检查结果及RFTC治疗范围,以提取RFTC治疗后癫痫发作结果的潜在术前预测因素。
平均随访32个月(范围2 - 119个月)后,8例患者RFTC治疗后癫痫发作频率降低≥50%(R +,34.8%),其中1例实现持续无癫痫发作,15例患者未从RFTC治疗中获益(R -,65.2%)。MRI病变的存在是治疗结果为阳性的唯一显著预测因素,而癫痫病灶位置、发作间期癫痫样放电(IEDs)范围、癫痫发作起始区范围、电刺激诱发癫痫发作情况以及热凝部位比例与RFTC治疗反应均无显著相关性。然而,R +组患者比R -组患者更常出现(亚)连续性IEDs,这表明即使在没有明显MRI病变的患者中,这种致痫组织的脑电图标记物也可能预测治疗结果为阳性。
我们的研究证实,尽管RFTC不如切除性手术有效,但在解剖结构限制无法进行任何皮质切除术的复杂病例中,它仍是一种合理的治疗选择。需要进一步开展前瞻性研究,以更好地明确RFTC的适应证并优化其治疗方法。