Oliveira Luísa Panadés-de, Pérez-Enríquez Carmen, Barguilla Ainara, Langohr Klaus, Conesa Gerardo, Infante Nazaret, Principe Alessandro, Rocamora Rodrigo
1Epilepsy Monitoring Unit, Department of Neurology, Hospital del Mar.
2Epilepsy Research Group, Hospital del Mar Medical Research Institute (IMIM).
J Neurosurg. 2022 Aug 12;138(3):837-846. doi: 10.3171/2022.6.JNS22733. Print 2023 Mar 1.
Coupled with stereo-electroencephalography (SEEG), radiofrequency thermocoagulation (RFTC) has emerged as a therapeutic alternative for patients with refractory focal epilepsy, with proven safe but highly variable results across studies. The authors aimed to describe the outcomes and safety of SEEG-RFTC, focusing on patients with MRI-negative epilepsy.
A retrospective observational study was conducted on patients evaluated by SEEG in the authors' center. Of 84 total cases, 55 underwent RFTC, with 31 MRI-negative epilepsies that were ultimately included in the study. The primary outcome was freedom from disabling seizures at last follow-up. Secondary outcomes were reduction in seizure frequency (RFTC response = seizure frequency reduction > 50%), peri-interventional complications, and neuropsychological outcomes. Potential factors influencing post-RFTC outcome were considered by comparing different variables between responders and nonresponders.
The mean follow-up period was 30.9 months (range 7.1-69.8 months). Three patients underwent subsequent resection/laser interstitial thermal therapy within the 1st year after RFTC failure. All other patients completed a minimum follow-up period of 1 year. Fourteen patients (45.2%) showed at least a 50% reduction in seizure frequency (responders), and 8 were seizure free (25.8% of the whole cohort). One case showed a permanent complication not directly related to thermolesions. Most patients (76%) showed no significant cognitive decline. Electrically elicited seizures (EESs) were observed in all seizure-free patients and were more frequent in responders (p = 0.038). All patients who were seizure free at the 6-month visit maintained their status during long-term follow-up.
SEEG-RFTC is a safe procedure and leads to a good response in many cases of MRI-negative focal epilepsies. One-quarter of the patients were seizure free and almost one-half were responders at the last follow-up. Although these results are still far from those achieved through conventional resection, a nonnegligible proportion of patients may benefit from this one-stage and much less invasive approach. Factors associated with seizure outcome remain to be elucidated; however, responders were significantly more frequent among patients with EESs, and achieving 6 months of seizure freedom appears to predict a good long-term response. In addition, the positive predictive value of RFTC response may be a valuable factor in the decision to proceed to subsequent surgery.
立体定向脑电图(SEEG)联合射频热凝术(RFTC)已成为难治性局灶性癫痫患者的一种治疗选择,研究证实其安全性良好,但不同研究结果差异很大。作者旨在描述SEEG-RFTC的疗效和安全性,重点关注MRI阴性癫痫患者。
对作者所在中心接受SEEG评估的患者进行回顾性观察研究。在总共84例病例中,55例接受了RFTC,最终31例MRI阴性癫痫患者纳入研究。主要结局是末次随访时无致残性癫痫发作。次要结局包括癫痫发作频率降低(RFTC反应=癫痫发作频率降低>50%)、围手术期并发症和神经心理学结局。通过比较反应者和无反应者之间的不同变量,考虑影响RFTC术后结局的潜在因素。
平均随访期为30.9个月(范围7.1 - 69.8个月)。3例患者在RFTC失败后的第1年内接受了后续切除/激光间质热疗。所有其他患者完成了至少1年的随访期。14例患者(45.2%)癫痫发作频率至少降低了50%(反应者),8例无癫痫发作(占整个队列的25.8%)。1例出现与热损伤无直接关系的永久性并发症。大多数患者(76%)无明显认知功能下降。所有无癫痫发作的患者均观察到电诱发癫痫发作(EESs),且反应者中更常见(p = 0.038)。所有在6个月随访时无癫痫发作的患者在长期随访中维持了该状态。
SEEG-RFTC是一种安全的手术方法,在许多MRI阴性局灶性癫痫病例中能产生良好反应。四分之一的患者在末次随访时无癫痫发作,近一半为反应者。尽管这些结果仍远不及传统切除术,但仍有不可忽视比例的患者可能从这种一期且侵入性小得多的方法中获益。与癫痫发作结局相关的因素仍有待阐明;然而,有EESs的患者中反应者明显更常见,且实现6个月无癫痫发作似乎可预测良好的长期反应。此外,RFTC反应的阳性预测价值可能是决定是否进行后续手术的一个重要因素。