Diesfeldt H F, Vink M T
Stichting Verpleeghuizen Nederland, Psychogeriatrische Dienst, Laren.
Tijdschr Gerontol Geriatr. 1989 Oct;20(5):203-9.
Sixty-five non-demented elderly adults, born between 1895 and 1918 (mean age +/- SD: 80.0 +/- 5.4) were tested with the Vocabulary Test of the 1970 Dutch revision (30-item form) of Wechsler's Adult Intelligence Scale. Subjects were recruited from homes for the aged and were rated by the staff as free from any symptoms of dementia or other psychiatric disease. Vocabulary scores ranged from 11 to 53 (maximum score would be 60) with mean +/- SD of 31.3 +/- 10.2 Subjects who had received more formal education performed better on this test (Pearson's r = 0.59). When education was controlled for in the analysis, the correlation between age and performance was attenuated and did not reach statistical significance (Pearson's r = -0.16). Data are presented for two levels of education that can be used to put clinical data in perspective. The level of difficulty of each item of the Vocabulary scale was calculated for this sample. Twelve per cent of the subjects recorded correct answers beyond the official criterion of five consecutive failures for discontinuing the test. The effect of differences in item difficulty could be minimized by using a criterion of six consecutive failures to determine the point at which the test should be discontinued.
对65名出生于1895年至1918年之间的非痴呆老年人(平均年龄±标准差:80.0±5.4)进行了韦氏成人智力量表1970年荷兰修订版(30项形式)的词汇测试。受试者从养老院招募,工作人员评定其无任何痴呆或其他精神疾病症状。词汇得分在11至53分之间(最高分应为60分),平均±标准差为31.3±10.2。接受过更多正规教育的受试者在该测试中表现更好(皮尔逊相关系数r = 0.59)。在分析中控制教育因素后,年龄与成绩之间的相关性减弱,未达到统计学显著性(皮尔逊相关系数r = -0.16)。给出了两个教育水平的数据,可用于正确看待临床数据。针对该样本计算了词汇量表每个项目的难度水平。12%的受试者在连续五次失败的官方停止测试标准之后记录了正确答案。通过使用连续六次失败的标准来确定测试应停止的点,可以将项目难度差异的影响降至最低。