• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

Ceph-X:二维头影测量系统的开发与评估

Ceph-X: development and evaluation of 2D cephalometric system.

作者信息

Mosleh Mogeeb Ahmed Ahmed, Baba Mohd Sapiyan, Malek Sorayya, Almaktari Rasheed A

机构信息

Software Engineering Department, Faculty of Engineering & Information Technology, Taiz University, 6169, Taiz, Yemen.

Institute of Biological Sciences, Faculty of Science, University of Malaya, 50603, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia.

出版信息

BMC Bioinformatics. 2016 Dec 22;17(Suppl 19):499. doi: 10.1186/s12859-016-1370-5.

DOI:10.1186/s12859-016-1370-5
PMID:28155649
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5259857/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Cephalometric analysis and measurements of skull parameters using X-Ray images plays an important role in predicating and monitoring orthodontic treatment. Manual analysis and measurements of cephalometric is considered tedious, time consuming, and subjected to human errors. Several cephalometric systems have been developed to automate the cephalometric procedure; however, no clear insights have been reported about reliability, performance, and usability of those systems. This study utilizes some techniques to evaluate reliability, performance, and usability metric using SUS methods of the developed cephalometric system which has not been reported in previous studies.

METHODS

In this study a novel system named Ceph-X is developed to computerize the manual tasks of orthodontics during cephalometric measurements. Ceph-X is developed by using image processing techniques with three main models: enhancements X-ray image model, locating landmark model, and computation model. Ceph-X was then evaluated by using X-ray images of 30 subjects (male and female) obtained from University of Malaya hospital. Three orthodontics specialists were involved in the evaluation of accuracy to avoid intra examiner error, and performance for Ceph-X, and 20 orthodontics specialists were involved in the evaluation of the usability, and user satisfaction for Ceph-X by using the SUS approach.

RESULTS

Statistical analysis for the comparison between the manual and automatic cephalometric approaches showed that Ceph-X achieved a great accuracy approximately 96.6%, with an acceptable errors variation approximately less than 0.5 mm, and 1°. Results showed that Ceph-X increased the specialist performance, and minimized the processing time to obtain cephalometric measurements of human skull. Furthermore, SUS analysis approach showed that Ceph-X has an excellent usability user's feedback.

CONCLUSIONS

The Ceph-X has proved its reliability, performance, and usability to be used by orthodontists for the analysis, diagnosis, and treatment of cephalometric.

摘要

背景

使用X射线图像进行头影测量分析和颅骨参数测量在正畸治疗的预测和监测中起着重要作用。头影测量的手动分析和测量被认为是繁琐、耗时且容易出现人为误差的。已经开发了几种头影测量系统来使头影测量程序自动化;然而,关于这些系统的可靠性、性能和可用性尚未有明确的见解报道。本研究利用一些技术,采用SUS方法评估已开发的头影测量系统的可靠性、性能和可用性指标,这在以前的研究中尚未报道。

方法

在本研究中,开发了一种名为Ceph-X的新型系统,以实现头影测量过程中正畸手动任务的计算机化。Ceph-X是通过使用图像处理技术开发的,有三个主要模型:增强X射线图像模型、定位标志点模型和计算模型。然后使用从马来亚大学医院获得的30名受试者(男性和女性)的X射线图像对Ceph-X进行评估。三名正畸专家参与了Ceph-X准确性的评估以避免检查者内部误差和性能评估,20名正畸专家参与了通过SUS方法对Ceph-X的可用性和用户满意度的评估。

结果

手动和自动头影测量方法之间比较的统计分析表明,Ceph-X达到了约96.6%的高精度,误差变化可接受,约小于0.5毫米和1°。结果表明,Ceph-X提高了专家的工作效率,并将获取人类颅骨的头影测量结果的处理时间降至最低。此外,SUS分析方法表明Ceph-X具有出色的可用性用户反馈。

结论

Ceph-X已证明其可靠性、性能和可用性,可供正畸医生用于头影测量的分析、诊断和治疗。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/676f/5259857/f992aae51632/12859_2016_1370_Fig5_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/676f/5259857/da1f2d96bacc/12859_2016_1370_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/676f/5259857/02db3acec459/12859_2016_1370_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/676f/5259857/db3ac3bf6c68/12859_2016_1370_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/676f/5259857/99c676d9b04a/12859_2016_1370_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/676f/5259857/f992aae51632/12859_2016_1370_Fig5_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/676f/5259857/da1f2d96bacc/12859_2016_1370_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/676f/5259857/02db3acec459/12859_2016_1370_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/676f/5259857/db3ac3bf6c68/12859_2016_1370_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/676f/5259857/99c676d9b04a/12859_2016_1370_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/676f/5259857/f992aae51632/12859_2016_1370_Fig5_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Ceph-X: development and evaluation of 2D cephalometric system.Ceph-X:二维头影测量系统的开发与评估
BMC Bioinformatics. 2016 Dec 22;17(Suppl 19):499. doi: 10.1186/s12859-016-1370-5.
2
Reliability of landmark identification in cephalometric radiography acquired by a storage phosphor imaging system.存储磷光成像系统获取的头影测量X线片中标志点识别的可靠性
Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 2004 Sep;33(5):301-6. doi: 10.1259/dmfr/85147715.
3
An evaluation of cellular neural networks for the automatic identification of cephalometric landmarks on digital images.用于在数字图像上自动识别头影测量标志点的细胞神经网络评估。
J Biomed Biotechnol. 2009;2009:717102. doi: 10.1155/2009/717102. Epub 2009 Sep 10.
4
Comparison of landmark identification and linear and angular measurements in conventional and digital cephalometry.传统头影测量与数字化头影测量中标志点识别及线性和角度测量的比较。
Int J Comput Dent. 2013;16(3):241-54.
5
Comparison of hand-traced and computerized cephalograms: landmark identification, measurement, and superimposition accuracy.手工描绘头颅侧位片与计算机化头颅侧位片的比较:标志点识别、测量及重叠精度
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2008 Apr;133(4):556-64. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2006.03.041.
6
Effects of image enhancement on reliability of landmark identification in digital cephalometry.图像增强对数字化头影测量中标志点识别可靠性的影响。
Indian J Dent Res. 2013 Jan-Feb;24(1):98-103. doi: 10.4103/0970-9290.114958.
7
Evaluation of speed, repeatability, and reproducibility of digital radiography with manual versus computer-assisted cephalometric analyses.数字放射成像在手动与计算机辅助头影测量分析中的速度、重复性和再现性评估。
Eur J Orthod. 2009 Oct;31(5):523-8. doi: 10.1093/ejo/cjp022. Epub 2009 May 14.
8
Radiographic evaluation of orthodontic treatment by means of four different cephalometric superimposition methods.通过四种不同的头影测量重叠方法对正畸治疗进行影像学评估。
Dental Press J Orthod. 2015 May-Jun;20(3):29-36. doi: 10.1590/2176-9451.20.3.029-036.oar.
9
Digital imaging of cephalometric radiographs, Part 2: Image quality.头影测量X线片的数字成像,第2部分:图像质量。
Angle Orthod. 1996;66(1):43-50. doi: 10.1043/0003-3219(1996)066<0043:DIOCRP>2.3.CO;2.
10
Precision of cephalometric analysis via fully and semiautomatic evaluation of digital lateral cephalographs.通过对数字化头颅侧位片进行全自动和半自动评估实现头影测量分析的精度
Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 2009 Sep;38(6):401-6. doi: 10.1259/dmfr/85543699.

引用本文的文献

1
Concerns regarding deployment of AI-based applications in dentistry - a review.关于牙科领域基于人工智能的应用部署的相关问题——综述
BDJ Open. 2025 Mar 25;11(1):27. doi: 10.1038/s41405-025-00319-7.
2
A comparative evaluation of concordance and speed between smartphone app-based and artificial intelligence web-based cephalometric tracing software with the manual tracing method: A cross-sectional study.基于智能手机应用程序和基于人工智能的网络头颅测量追踪软件与手工追踪方法之间的一致性和速度的比较评估:一项横断面研究。
J Clin Exp Dent. 2024 Jan 1;16(1):e11-e17. doi: 10.4317/jced.60899. eCollection 2024 Jan.
3
Skeletal facial asymmetry: reliability of manual and artificial intelligence-driven analysis.

本文引用的文献

1
Comparative evaluation of cephalometric measurements of monitor-displayed images by Nemoceph software and its hard copy by manual tracing.通过Nemoceph软件对显示器显示图像进行头影测量的比较评估及其手工描绘的硬拷贝。
J Oral Biol Craniofac Res. 2014 Jan-Apr;4(1):35-41. doi: 10.1016/j.jobcr.2013.11.002. Epub 2014 Jan 8.
2
A hard tissue cephalometric comparative study between hand tracing and computerized tracing.一项关于手工描绘与计算机化描绘的硬组织头颅侧位X线片对比研究。
J Pharm Bioallied Sci. 2014 Jul;6(Suppl 1):S101-6. doi: 10.4103/0975-7406.137401.
3
Reliability of four different computerized cephalometric analysis programs.
骨骼面部不对称:手动和人工智能驱动分析的可靠性。
Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 2024 Jan 11;53(1):52-59. doi: 10.1093/dmfr/twad006.
4
Correlation Analysis of Nasal Septum Deviation and Results of AI-Driven Automated 3D Cephalometric Analysis.鼻中隔偏曲与人工智能驱动的自动三维头影测量分析结果的相关性分析
J Clin Med. 2023 Oct 19;12(20):6621. doi: 10.3390/jcm12206621.
5
Accuracy of one-step automated orthodontic diagnosis model using a convolutional neural network and lateral cephalogram images with different qualities obtained from nationwide multi-hospitals.使用卷积神经网络和从全国多家医院获取的不同质量的头颅侧位片图像的一步式自动正畸诊断模型的准确性。
Korean J Orthod. 2022 Jan 25;52(1):3-19. doi: 10.4041/kjod.2022.52.1.3.
6
Comparison of cephalometric measurements between conventional and automatic cephalometric analysis using convolutional neural network.比较使用卷积神经网络的传统和自动头影测量分析的头影测量测量值。
Prog Orthod. 2021 May 31;22(1):14. doi: 10.1186/s40510-021-00358-4.
7
Web-based Fully Automated Cephalometric Analysis: Comparisons between App-aided, Computerized, and Manual Tracings.基于网络的全自动头影测量分析:应用程序辅助、计算机化和手工描记之间的比较。
Turk J Orthod. 2020 Aug 11;33(3):142-149. doi: 10.5152/TurkJOrthod.2020.20062. eCollection 2020 Sep.
8
Bioinformatics and systems biology research update from the 15 International Conference on Bioinformatics (InCoB2016).来自第15届国际生物信息学会议(InCoB2016)的生物信息学与系统生物学研究进展
BMC Bioinformatics. 2016 Dec 22;17(Suppl 19):524. doi: 10.1186/s12859-016-1409-7.
四种不同的计算机头影测量分析程序的可靠性。
Eur J Orthod. 2012 Jun;34(3):318-21. doi: 10.1093/ejo/cjr008. Epub 2011 Apr 18.
4
Comparison of cephalometric measurements with digital versus conventional cephalometric analysis.数字化与传统头影测量分析在头影测量值方面的比较。
Eur J Orthod. 2009 Jun;31(3):241-6. doi: 10.1093/ejo/cjn105. Epub 2009 Feb 23.
5
Accuracy of three-dimensional measurements obtained from cone beam computed tomography surface-rendered images for cephalometric analysis: influence of patient scanning position.锥形束计算机断层扫描表面重建图像用于头影测量分析的三维测量准确性:患者扫描位置的影响
Eur J Orthod. 2009 Apr;31(2):129-34. doi: 10.1093/ejo/cjn088. Epub 2008 Dec 23.
6
Three-dimensional accuracy of measurements made with software on cone-beam computed tomography images.使用软件在锥束计算机断层扫描图像上进行测量的三维准确性。
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2008 Jul;134(1):112-6. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2006.08.024.
7
An image processing system for locating craniofacial landmarks.用于定位颅面标志的图像处理系统。
IEEE Trans Med Imaging. 1994;13(2):275-89. doi: 10.1109/42.293920.
8
Automatic cephalometric analysis.自动头影测量分析
Angle Orthod. 2008 Jan;78(1):145-51. doi: 10.2319/120506-491.1.
9
An evaluation of the errors in cephalometric measurements on scanned cephalometric images and conventional tracings.对扫描头影测量图像和传统描图上的头影测量误差的评估。
Eur J Orthod. 2007 Feb;29(1):105-8. doi: 10.1093/ejo/cjl065.
10
Three-dimensional cephalometry: spiral multi-slice vs cone-beam computed tomography.三维头影测量术:螺旋多层与锥形束计算机断层扫描
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2006 Sep;130(3):410-6. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2005.11.035.