Glenk Lisa Maria
Comparative Medicine, The Interuniversity Messerli Research Institute of the University of Veterinary Medicine Vienna, Medical University Vienna and University of Vienna, Vienna 1210, Austri.
Animals (Basel). 2017 Feb 1;7(2):7. doi: 10.3390/ani7020007.
Research into the effects of animal-assisted interventions (AAIs) has primarily addressed human health outcomes. In contrast, only few publications deal with the therapy dog experience of AAIs. This paper provides an overview on potential welfare threats that therapy dogs may encounter and presents the results of a review of available studies on welfare indicators for therapy dogs during AAIs. Previous investigations used physiological and behavioral welfare indicators and dog handler surveys to identify work-related stress. Research outcomes are discussed in the light of strengths and weaknesses of the methods used. Study results suggest that frequency and duration of AAI sessions, novelty of the environment, controllability, age and familiarity of recipients modulate animal welfare indicators. However, this review reveals that currently, clear conclusions on how the well-being of dogs is influenced by the performance in AAIs are lacking due to the heterogeneity of programs, recipient and session characteristics, small dog sample sizes and methodological limitations. This paper further aimed to identify unresolved difficulties in previous research to pave the way for future investigations supporting the applicability of scientific findings in practice.
对动物辅助干预(AAIs)效果的研究主要关注人类健康结果。相比之下,仅有少数出版物涉及动物辅助干预中治疗犬的经历。本文概述了治疗犬可能遇到的潜在福利威胁,并呈现了对动物辅助干预期间治疗犬福利指标现有研究的综述结果。先前的调查使用生理和行为福利指标以及犬主人调查来识别与工作相关的压力。根据所用方法的优缺点对研究结果进行了讨论。研究结果表明,动物辅助干预课程的频率和时长、环境的新奇性、可控性、接受者的年龄和熟悉程度会调节动物福利指标。然而,本综述表明,目前由于项目、接受者和课程特征的异质性、犬样本量小以及方法学局限性,缺乏关于动物辅助干预表现如何影响犬福祉的明确结论。本文还旨在识别先前研究中未解决的困难,为未来支持科学研究结果在实践中应用的调查铺平道路。