Pongrácz Péter, Dobos Petra
Department of Ethology, ELTE Eötvös Loránd University, 1117 Pázmány Péter sétány 1/c, Budapest, Hungary.
Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc. 2025 Feb;100(1):68-84. doi: 10.1111/brv.13128. Epub 2024 Aug 5.
The behaviour of dogs holds great relevance for not only scientists from fundamental and applied research areas, but also due to the widespread roles of dogs in our societies as companions and working animals; their behaviour is also an important factor in animal and human welfare. A large proportion of dogs currently under human supervision belong to one of roughly 400 recognised breeds. Dog breeds can be characterised by distinctive, predictable and reproducible features, including some of their behavioural traits. To the scientist, the comparative analysis of the behaviour of dog breeds provides an opportunity for investigating an array of intriguing phenomena within an easily accessible model organism created from natural and human-driven evolutionary processes. There are many ways to design and conduct breed-related behavioural investigations, but such endeavours should always be based around biologically relevant research questions and lead to ecologically valid conclusions. In this review, we surveyed recent research efforts that included dog behaviour-related comparisons and applied a critical evaluation according to their methods of breed choice and the subsequent research design. Our aim was to assess whether these two fundamentally important components of experimental design provide a solid basis to reach valid conclusions. Based on 97 publications that fulfilled our selection criteria, we identified three primary methods used by researchers to select breeds for their investigations: (i) convenience sampling; (ii) hypothesis-driven, ancestry-based sampling; and (iii) hypothesis-driven, functional sampling. By using the SWOT (Strengths, Weaknesses, Opportunities, Threats) evaluation system, we highlight each of these techniques' merits and shortcomings. We identify when particular methods may be inherently unable to produce biologically meaningful results due to a mismatch between breed choice and the initial research goals. We hope that our evaluation will help researchers adopt best practices in experimental design regarding future dog breed comparisons.
狗的行为不仅对基础研究和应用研究领域的科学家具有重要意义,而且由于狗在我们社会中作为伴侣动物和工作动物所扮演的广泛角色,其行为也是动物和人类福利的一个重要因素。目前在人类监管下的大部分狗属于大约400个公认品种中的一种。犬种可以通过独特、可预测和可重复的特征来表征,包括它们的一些行为特征。对科学家来说,犬种行为的比较分析为在一个由自然和人类驱动的进化过程所产生的易于获取的模式生物中研究一系列有趣现象提供了机会。有许多方法来设计和进行与品种相关的行为研究,但这些努力应该始终围绕生物学相关的研究问题展开,并得出生态有效的结论。在本综述中,我们调查了最近的研究工作,这些工作包括与狗行为相关的比较,并根据其品种选择方法和后续研究设计进行了批判性评估。我们的目的是评估实验设计的这两个基本重要组成部分是否为得出有效结论提供了坚实的基础。基于97篇符合我们选择标准的出版物,我们确定了研究人员在调查中选择品种的三种主要方法:(i)便利抽样;(ii)假设驱动、基于血统的抽样;以及(iii)假设驱动、功能抽样。通过使用SWOT(优势、劣势、机会、威胁)评估系统,我们突出了每种技术的优点和缺点。我们确定了由于品种选择与初始研究目标不匹配,某些方法何时可能天生无法产生具有生物学意义的结果。我们希望我们的评估将有助于研究人员在未来犬种比较的实验设计中采用最佳实践。