• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

共享医疗预约的现实主义综述:它们如何发挥作用、对谁发挥作用以及在何种情况下发挥作用?

A realist review of shared medical appointments: How, for whom, and under what circumstances do they work?

作者信息

Kirsh Susan R, Aron David C, Johnson Kimberly D, Santurri Laura E, Stevenson Lauren D, Jones Katherine R, Jagosh Justin

机构信息

Louis Stokes Cleveland VA Medical Center, Cleveland, OH, USA.

School of Medicine, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH, USA.

出版信息

BMC Health Serv Res. 2017 Feb 4;17(1):113. doi: 10.1186/s12913-017-2064-z.

DOI:10.1186/s12913-017-2064-z
PMID:28160771
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5291948/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Shared medical appointments (SMAs) are doctor-patient visits in which groups of patients are seen by one or more health care providers in a concurrent session. There is a growing interest in understanding the potential benefits of SMAs in various contexts to improve clinical outcomes and reduce healthcare costs. This study builds upon the existing evidence base that suggests SMAs are indeed effective. In this study, we explored how they are effective in terms of the underlying mechanisms of action and under what circumstances.

METHODS

Realist review methodology was used to synthesize the literature on SMAs, which included a broad search of 800+ published articles. 71 high quality primary research articles were retained to build a conceptual model of SMAs and 20 of those were selected for an in depth analysis using realist methodology (i.e.,middle-range theories and and context-mechanism-outcome configurations).

RESULTS

Nine main mechanisms that serve to explain how SMAs work were theorized from the data immersion process and configured in a series of context-mechanism-outcome configurations (CMOs). These are: (1) Group exposure in SMAs combats isolation, which in turn helps to remove doubts about one's ability to manage illness; (2) Patients learn about disease self-management vicariously by witnessing others' illness experiences; (3) Patients feel inspired by seeing others who are coping well; (4) Group dynamics lead patients and providers to developing more equitable relationships; (5) Providers feel increased appreciation and rapport toward colleagues leading to increased efficiency; (6) Providers learn from the patients how better to meet their patients' needs; (7) Adequate time allotment of the SMA leads patients to feel supported; (8) Patients receive professional expertise from the provider in combination with first-hand information from peers, resulting in more robust health knowledge; and (9) Patients have the opportunity to see how the physicians interact with fellow patients, which allows them to get to know the physician and better determine their level of trust.

CONCLUSIONS

Nine overarching mechanisms were configured in CMO configurations and discussed as a set of complementary middle-range programme theories to explain how SMAs work. It is anticipated that this innovative work in theorizing SMAs using realist review methodology will provide policy makers and SMA program planners adequate conceptual grounding to design contextually sensitive SMA programs in a wide variety of settings and advance an SMA research agenda for varied contexts.

摘要

背景

共享医疗预约(SMA)是指在同一时段内,一组患者由一名或多名医疗服务提供者进行诊治。人们越来越关注了解SMA在各种情况下的潜在益处,以改善临床结果并降低医疗成本。本研究建立在现有证据基础之上,这些证据表明SMA确实有效。在本研究中,我们探讨了SMA在作用机制方面是如何有效的,以及在何种情况下有效。

方法

采用实在论综述方法对有关SMA的文献进行综合分析,其中包括广泛检索800多篇已发表的文章。保留了71篇高质量的原始研究文章,以构建SMA的概念模型,并从中选择20篇使用实在论方法进行深入分析(即中程理论以及背景-机制-结果配置)。

结果

通过数据沉浸过程,从理论上推导出九个主要机制,这些机制用于解释SMA的工作原理,并配置在一系列背景-机制-结果配置(CMO)中。它们分别是:(1)SMA中的群体接触可对抗孤立感,这反过来有助于消除对自身疾病管理能力的疑虑;(2)患者通过目睹他人的患病经历间接学习疾病自我管理;(3)看到应对良好的他人会激励患者;(4)群体动态促使患者和提供者建立更公平的关系;(5)提供者对同事的认可度和融洽度提高,从而提高效率;(6)提供者从患者那里学习如何更好地满足患者需求;(7)SMA有足够的时间分配,使患者感到得到支持;(8)患者从提供者那里获得专业知识,并结合来自同伴的第一手信息,从而获得更丰富的健康知识;(9)患者有机会看到医生与其他患者的互动方式,这使他们能够了解医生并更好地确定对医生的信任程度。

结论

九个总体机制在CMO配置中进行了构建,并作为一组互补的中程项目理论进行了讨论,以解释SMA的工作原理。预计这项使用实在论综述方法对SMA进行理论化的创新性工作,将为政策制定者和SMA项目规划者提供充分的概念基础,以便在各种环境中设计因地制宜的SMA项目,并推进针对不同环境的SMA研究议程。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d6bb/5291948/2391f075460c/12913_2017_2064_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d6bb/5291948/d53d4f6ae645/12913_2017_2064_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d6bb/5291948/2391f075460c/12913_2017_2064_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d6bb/5291948/d53d4f6ae645/12913_2017_2064_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d6bb/5291948/2391f075460c/12913_2017_2064_Fig2_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
A realist review of shared medical appointments: How, for whom, and under what circumstances do they work?共享医疗预约的现实主义综述:它们如何发挥作用、对谁发挥作用以及在何种情况下发挥作用?
BMC Health Serv Res. 2017 Feb 4;17(1):113. doi: 10.1186/s12913-017-2064-z.
2
[Shared Medical Appointments: experiences of patients and care givers].[共享医疗预约:患者及护理人员的经历]
Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd. 2009;153:A828.
3
Healthcare providers experiences with shared medical appointments for heart failure.医疗保健提供者对心力衰竭共病管理的体验。
PLoS One. 2022 Feb 7;17(2):e0263498. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0263498. eCollection 2022.
4
Shared medical appointments: new concept for high-volume follow-up for bariatric patients.共享医疗预约:肥胖症患者大量随访的新概念。
Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2006 Sep-Oct;2(5):509-12. doi: 10.1016/j.soard.2006.05.010. Epub 2006 Jul 27.
5
Integration of Personalized Health Planning and Shared Medical Appointments for Patients with Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus.2型糖尿病患者个性化健康规划与共享医疗预约的整合
South Med J. 2018 Nov;111(11):674-682. doi: 10.14423/SMJ.0000000000000892.
6
Shared medical appointments in English primary care for long-term conditions: a qualitative study of the views and experiences of patients, primary care staff and other stakeholders.在英国初级保健中用于长期疾病的共病诊疗:对患者、初级保健人员和其他利益相关者的观点和经验的定性研究。
BMC Prim Care. 2022 Jul 20;23(1):180. doi: 10.1186/s12875-022-01790-z.
7
Shared medical appointments: improving access, outcomes, and satisfaction for patients with chronic cardiac diseases.共病诊疗:改善慢性心脏疾病患者的就诊机会、结局和满意度。
J Cardiovasc Nurs. 2010 Jan-Feb;25(1):13-9. doi: 10.1097/JCN.0b013e3181b8e82e.
8
Patients' and providers' satisfaction with shared medical appointments.患者和医疗服务提供者对联合医疗预约的满意度。
Aust Fam Physician. 2015 Sep;44(9):674-9.
9
Shared Medical Appointments May Be Effective for Improving Clinical and Behavioral Outcomes in Type 2 Diabetes: A Narrative Review.共享医疗预约可能对改善2型糖尿病的临床和行为结局有效:一项叙述性综述。
Front Endocrinol (Lausanne). 2017 Oct 4;8:263. doi: 10.3389/fendo.2017.00263. eCollection 2017.
10
Shared Medical Appointments in Cancer Survivorship Care: A Review of the Literature.癌症康复照护中的共病诊疗:文献回顾。
J Oncol Pract. 2015 Jan;11(1):6-11. doi: 10.1200/JOP.2014.001411. Epub 2014 Nov 25.

引用本文的文献

1
Patient experiences with group consultations when treated with semaglutide for obesity: a qualitative case study in a Danish general practice.司美格鲁肽治疗肥胖症时患者参与小组会诊的体验:丹麦一家普通诊所的定性案例研究
BMJ Open. 2025 Jul 25;15(7):e093357. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-093357.
2
Engaging English- and Spanish-speaking older adults with and without possible cognitive impairment in advance care planning group visits: Protocol for the ENgaging in Advance Care Planning Talks (ENACT) Randomized Controlled Trial.让有或无可能存在认知障碍的讲英语和西班牙语的老年人参与预先护理计划小组访视:参与预先护理计划谈话(ENACT)随机对照试验方案。
Res Sq. 2025 Jun 20:rs.3.rs-6560971. doi: 10.21203/rs.3.rs-6560971/v1.
3

本文引用的文献

1
Critical reflections on realist review: insights from customizing the methodology to the needs of participatory research assessment.对现实主义综述的批判性反思:从定制方法以满足参与式研究评估的需求中获得的见解。
Res Synth Methods. 2014 Jun;5(2):131-41. doi: 10.1002/jrsm.1099. Epub 2013 Oct 22.
2
Impact of community based peer support in type 2 diabetes: a cluster randomised controlled trial of individual and/or group approaches.基于社区的同伴支持对2型糖尿病的影响:个体和/或团体方法的整群随机对照试验
PLoS One. 2015 Mar 18;10(3):e0120277. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0120277. eCollection 2015.
3
Individual peer support: a qualitative study of mechanisms of its effectiveness.
Using the RE-AIM framework to evaluate the impact of shared medical appointments for diabetes mellitus: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
运用RE-AIM框架评估共享医疗预约对糖尿病的影响:一项系统评价与荟萃分析。
BMC Prim Care. 2025 Jun 5;26(1):192. doi: 10.1186/s12875-025-02875-1.
4
Acceptability and value of shared medical appointments in a non-general practitioner specialist context.非全科医生专科背景下共享医疗预约的可接受性和价值。
Intern Med J. 2025 Jun;55(6):1024-1027. doi: 10.1111/imj.70098. Epub 2025 May 28.
5
Dynamics in implementing the Good Financial Grant Practice standard across three African universities: an Indigenous realist evaluation.在三所非洲大学实施良好财务资助实践标准的动态过程:一项本土现实主义评估
Health Res Policy Syst. 2025 May 26;23(1):69. doi: 10.1186/s12961-025-01343-7.
6
What works, how and in which contexts when using digital health to support parents/carers to implement intensive speech and language therapy at home for children with speech sound disorder? A realist review.在使用数字健康支持父母/照顾者在家中为语音障碍儿童实施强化言语和语言治疗时,什么有效、如何有效以及在哪些情况下有效?一项现实主义综述。
PLoS One. 2025 May 7;20(5):e0321647. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0321647. eCollection 2025.
7
Characterizing primary care patient referrals and attendance patterns for virtual lifestyle medicine shared medical appointments.描述虚拟生活方式医学共享医疗预约的初级保健患者转诊及就诊模式。
Prev Med Rep. 2025 Apr 7;53:103059. doi: 10.1016/j.pmedr.2025.103059. eCollection 2025 May.
8
Shared Medical Appointments to Improve Equitable Access to Rehabilitative Care for Long COVID.共享医疗预约以改善长期新冠康复护理的公平可及性。
Cardiopulm Phys Ther J. 2025 Jan;36(1):50-57. doi: 10.1097/cpt.0000000000000266. Epub 2024 Dec 3.
9
Equitable Access to Lifestyle Medicine: FQHCs, YMCAs, Trauma-Informed Health Coaching, and "Community as Medicine".公平获得生活方式医学:联邦合格健康中心、基督教青年会、创伤知情健康指导以及“社区即医学”
Am J Lifestyle Med. 2025 Mar 18:15598276251325799. doi: 10.1177/15598276251325799.
10
Outpatient Virtual Care Among People Living With and Beyond Cancer From Culturally and Linguistically Diverse Backgrounds in Australia: A Protocol for a Realist Evaluation.澳大利亚具有多元文化和语言背景的癌症患者及康复者的门诊虚拟护理:一项现实主义评价方案
Health Expect. 2025 Apr;28(2):e70235. doi: 10.1111/hex.70235.
个体同伴支持:对其有效性机制的定性研究
Community Ment Health J. 2015 May;51(4):445-52. doi: 10.1007/s10597-014-9801-0. Epub 2014 Dec 23.
4
Characteristics and effectiveness of diabetes self-management educational programs targeted to racial/ethnic minority groups: a systematic review, meta-analysis and meta-regression.针对种族/族裔少数群体的糖尿病自我管理教育项目的特征与效果:一项系统评价、荟萃分析和元回归分析
BMC Endocr Disord. 2014 Jul 19;14:60. doi: 10.1186/1472-6823-14-60.
5
Peer support to decrease diabetes-related distress in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus: design of a randomised controlled trial.同伴支持降低 2 型糖尿病患者糖尿病相关困扰的随机对照试验设计。
BMC Endocr Disord. 2014 Mar 4;14:21. doi: 10.1186/1472-6823-14-21.
6
'I call it the blame and shame disease': a qualitative study about perceptions of social stigma surrounding type 2 diabetes.“我称之为指责和羞耻病”:一项关于 2 型糖尿病相关社会污名化看法的定性研究。
BMJ Open. 2013 Nov 18;3(11):e003384. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2013-003384.
7
Implementing a peer-support intervention for people with type 2 diabetes: a qualitative study.实施 2 型糖尿病患者同伴支持干预措施:一项定性研究。
Fam Pract. 2013 Oct;30(5):593-603. doi: 10.1093/fampra/cmt027. Epub 2013 Jul 8.
8
Shared Medical Appointments marginally enhance interaction between patients: an observational study on children and adolescents with type 1 diabetes.共病诊疗在一定程度上增进医患互动:一项针对 1 型糖尿病儿童和青少年患者的观察性研究。
Patient Educ Couns. 2013 Sep;92(3):418-25. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2013.06.008. Epub 2013 Jul 3.
9
Shared medical appointments for patients with kidney stones new to medical management decrease appointment wait time and increase patient knowledge.对于刚开始接受医学治疗的肾结石患者,共同就诊可以减少预约等待时间并增加患者的知识。
J Urol. 2013 Nov;190(5):1778-84. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2013.05.037. Epub 2013 May 23.
10
Group medical visits can deliver on patient-centred care objectives: results from a qualitative study.小组医疗访问可以实现以患者为中心的护理目标:定性研究的结果。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2013 Apr 29;13:155. doi: 10.1186/1472-6963-13-155.