Peprah Prince, Osman Sagda, Mitchell Rebecca, Chauhan Ashfaq, Walsan Ramya, Sina Maryam, Newman Bronwyn, El-Kabbout Nadine, Mumford Jan, Francis-Auton Emilie, Manias Elizabeth, Mumford Virginia, Churruca Kate, Moscova Michelle, Taylor Natalie, Nelson Craig, Cardenas Alexander, Clay-Williams Robyn, Braithwaite Jeffrey, Harrison Reema
Australian Institute of Health Innovation, Faculty of Medicine, Health and Human Sciences, Macquarie University, North Ryde, New South Wales, Australia.
Nafs Counselling, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
Health Expect. 2025 Apr;28(2):e70235. doi: 10.1111/hex.70235.
Virtual care is increasingly being used to deliver outpatient cancer services, yet people from culturally and linguistically diverse (CALD) backgrounds can experience inequities in accessing these services. A range of complex and context-specific factors impact the effectiveness of virtual care and equity in its use and outcomes. This study draws on the methodological principles of realist evaluation to provide contextual understanding and account of how, why and in what circumstances outpatient virtual care services work (or not) for people from CALD backgrounds accessing cancer services in Australia.
Realist evaluation, a theory-driven approach, allows researchers to provide a nuanced understanding of how, for whom and why different interventions work (or not) under different circumstances. We propose an iterative and stakeholder-driven four-phase study design that is exploratory and sequential, following the Realist and Meta-narrative Evidence Synthesis: Evolving Standards (RAMESES II) quality standards for realist studies. Phase 1 will generate the initial program theory from a realist synthesis of theories for how virtual care interventions are implemented into routine care and semi-structured interviews with key stakeholders, including CALD service providers, service leaders and people with cancer and/or their carers who are from CALD backgrounds. Phase 2 will use semi-structured realist interviews and focus group discussions with stakeholders and retroductive, theory-driven realist analysis to test and refine the initial program theory. Phase 3 will validate the program theory with a small purposive participant sample outside those who participated in phases 1 and 2. The final phase will coproduce theory-informed actionable recommendations and guidelines for effective virtual models of care implementation through interactive workshops with consumers, managers, service leaders and providers.
Knowledge of the contexts and mechanisms that produce optimal outcomes from virtual care is essential to guide the design, adjustment and implementation of virtual care models that provide equitable care outcomes for all patients. Outputs from this realist evaluation, including the program theory and actionable recommendations and guidelines, will inform policy and practice about implementing or adjusting virtual care models and policies or procedures in Australian healthcare to make them more accessible and equitable.
The conceptualisation and design of this study were developed with healthcare consumers from diverse cultural and linguistic backgrounds, healthcare providers and academics as part of a national project in Australia. Multicultural consumers who have lived experience of accessing cancer services contributed to the project's design as investigators and are coauthors of this protocol paper. Patients and the public are also represented as Project Steering Group members who will inform the data collection processes, development, and refinement of our program theory.
虚拟医疗越来越多地用于提供门诊癌症服务,但来自文化和语言背景多元(CALD)的人群在获取这些服务时可能会面临不公平现象。一系列复杂且特定于情境的因素会影响虚拟医疗的有效性及其使用和效果的公平性。本研究借鉴现实主义评价的方法原则,以提供情境理解,并说明门诊虚拟医疗服务如何、为何以及在何种情况下对澳大利亚CALD背景的癌症患者有效(或无效)。
现实主义评价是一种理论驱动的方法,使研究人员能够对不同干预措施在不同情况下如何、为谁以及为何有效(或无效)有细致入微的理解。我们提出了一种迭代且由利益相关者驱动的四阶段研究设计,该设计具有探索性和连贯性,遵循现实主义与元叙事证据综合:不断发展的标准(RAMESES II)现实主义研究的质量标准。第一阶段将通过对虚拟医疗干预措施如何纳入常规护理的理论进行现实主义综合,以及对关键利益相关者进行半结构化访谈来生成初始项目理论,这些利益相关者包括CALD服务提供者、服务领导者以及来自CALD背景的癌症患者和/或其护理人员。第二阶段将使用与利益相关者的半结构化现实主义访谈和焦点小组讨论,以及追溯性的、理论驱动的现实主义分析来测试和完善初始项目理论。第三阶段将在未参与第一和第二阶段的小范围有目的参与者样本中验证项目理论。最后阶段将通过与消费者、管理人员、服务领导者和提供者的互动研讨会,共同制定基于理论的可操作建议和指南,以实现有效的虚拟护理模式。
了解能使虚拟医疗产生最佳效果的背景和机制对于指导虚拟护理模式的设计、调整和实施至关重要,这些模式要为所有患者提供公平的护理结果。这项现实主义评价的成果,包括项目理论以及可操作的建议和指南,将为澳大利亚医疗保健领域实施或调整虚拟护理模式及政策或程序提供信息,使其更易于获取且更加公平。
本研究的概念化和设计是与来自不同文化和语言背景的医疗消费者、医疗服务提供者和学者共同开展的,作为澳大利亚一个国家项目的一部分。有获取癌症服务亲身经历的多元文化消费者作为研究人员参与了项目设计,并且是本方案论文的共同作者。患者和公众还作为项目指导小组的成员,将为数据收集过程、项目理论的发展和完善提供信息。