Schlinkmann K M, Razum O, Werber D
Helmholtz Centre for Infection Research,Department for Epidemiology,ESME - Epidemiological and Statistical Methods Research Group.
Bielefeld University,School of Public Health,Department of Epidemiology and International Public Health.
Epidemiol Infect. 2017 Apr;145(6):1231-1238. doi: 10.1017/S0950268816003344. Epub 2017 Feb 6.
Foodborne disease outbreaks (FBDOs) occur frequently in Europe. Employing analytical epidemiological study designs increases the likelihood of identifying the suspected vehicle(s), but these studies are rarely applied in FBDO investigations. We used multivariable binary logistic regression analysis to identify characteristics of investigated FBDOs reported to the European Food Safety Authority (2007-2011) that were associated with analytical epidemiological evidence (compared to evidence from microbiological investigations/descriptive epidemiology only). The analysis was restricted to FBDO investigations, where the evidence for the suspected vehicle was considered 'strong', i.e. convincing. The presence of analytical epidemiological evidence was reported in 2012 (50%) of these 4038 outbreaks. In multivariable analysis, increasing outbreak size, number of hospitalizations, causative (i.e. aetiological) agent (whether identified and, if so, which one), and the setting in which these outbreaks occurred (e.g. geographically dispersed outbreaks) were independently associated with presence of analytical evidence. The number of investigations with reported analytical epidemiological evidence was unexpectedly high, likely indicating the need for quality assurance within the European Union foodborne outbreak reporting system, and warranting cautious interpretation of our findings. This first analysis of evidence implicating a food vehicle in FBDOs may help to inform public health authorities on when to use analytical epidemiological study designs.
食源性疾病暴发(FBDOs)在欧洲频繁发生。采用分析性流行病学研究设计增加了识别可疑传播媒介的可能性,但这些研究很少应用于食源性疾病暴发调查。我们使用多变量二元逻辑回归分析来确定向欧洲食品安全局报告的(2007 - 2011年)已调查食源性疾病暴发的特征,这些特征与分析性流行病学证据相关(与仅来自微生物学调查/描述性流行病学的证据相比)。分析仅限于食源性疾病暴发调查,其中可疑传播媒介的证据被认为是“有力的”,即有说服力的。在这4038起暴发中,2012年报告了分析性流行病学证据(占50%)。在多变量分析中,暴发规模的增加、住院人数、致病(即病因学)因子(是否确定以及如果确定是哪种)以及这些暴发发生的环境(例如地理上分散的暴发)与分析性证据的存在独立相关。报告有分析性流行病学证据的调查数量出乎意料地高,这可能表明欧盟食源性疾病暴发报告系统内需要质量保证,并需要对我们的研究结果进行谨慎解读。这首次对食源性疾病暴发中涉及食品传播媒介的证据进行的分析可能有助于告知公共卫生当局何时使用分析性流行病学研究设计。