Parčina Amižić Ivana, Cigić Livia, Gavić Lidia, Radić Marina, Biočina Lukenda Dolores, Tonkić Marija, Goić Barišić Ivana
Dental Practice, Health Center of Split, Dalmatia County, Split; Croatia.
Department of Oral Medicine and Periodontology, School of Medicine, University of Split; Croatia.
Med Glas (Zenica). 2017 Feb 1;14(1):139-144. doi: 10.17392/870-16.
Aim To evaluate, in vitro antimicrobial ability of two probiotic toothpastes (one containing Lactobacillus paracasei, other containing Lactobacillus acidophilus) and one toothpaste without probiotic separately, and in a combination with two different mouthrinses (one containing essential oils and the other containing hexitidine). Methods Antimicrobial susceptibility was checked by using the ditch method and Clinical Laboratory Standard Institute (CLSI) guidelines. Two different toothpastes with probiotic, toothpaste without probiotic and two different mouthrinses were tested against the following selected microorganisms: Candida albicans, Candida tropicalis, Enterococcus faecalis, Streptococcus salivarius and Staphylococcus aureus. Kruskal-Wallis test and MannWhitney U test were used for the statistical analysis (p≤ 0.05). Results Probiotic toothpastes had better inhibitory effect than toothpaste without probiotic in the case of Candida albicans (p=0.043) and Streptococcus salivarius (p=0.043). In all cases, toothpastes had stronger inhibition capacity than mouthrinses (p≤0.05). Conclusion Probiotic toothpastes, as a relatively new concept in the prevention of oral infectious diseases such as caries and periodontal disease, can contribute to the prevention of oral infectious diseases.
目的 分别评估两种益生菌牙膏(一种含副干酪乳杆菌,另一种含嗜酸乳杆菌)和一种不含益生菌的牙膏,以及它们与两种不同漱口水(一种含精油,另一种含己脒定)联合使用时的体外抗菌能力。方法 使用沟痕法和临床实验室标准协会(CLSI)指南检查抗菌药敏性。对两种含益生菌的不同牙膏、不含益生菌的牙膏和两种不同漱口水针对以下选定微生物进行测试:白色念珠菌、热带念珠菌、粪肠球菌、唾液链球菌和金黄色葡萄球菌。采用Kruskal-Wallis检验和Mann-Whitney U检验进行统计分析(p≤0.05)。结果 在白色念珠菌(p=0.043)和唾液链球菌(p=0.043)的情况下,益生菌牙膏比不含益生菌的牙膏具有更好的抑制作用。在所有情况下,牙膏的抑制能力都比漱口水强(p≤0.05)。结论 益生菌牙膏作为预防龋齿和牙周病等口腔传染病的一个相对较新的概念,有助于预防口腔传染病。