Ranjit S, Pradhan B B
Department of Anaesthesiology, Dhulikhel Hospital, Kathmandu University Hospital, Dhulikhel, Kavre, Nepal.
Kathmandu Univ Med J (KUMJ). 2016 Apr-Jun;14(54):125-129.
Background Positioning patients with fractured femur for subarachnoid block is painful. Intravenous analgesics or peripheral nerve block like femoral nerve block or fascia iliaca compartment block are some of the available techniques to reduce pain. We compared the efficacy of femoral nerve block and intravenous fentanyl in providing effective analgesia before positioning for subarachnoid block. Objective This study was designed to compare between ultrasound guided femoral nerve block with lignocaine and intravenous fentanyl in providing effective analgesia before positioning patient with femur fracture in sitting position for subarachnoid block. Method Forty patients undergoing surgery for femur fracture were randomized to either femoral nerve block (FNB) or intravenous fentanyl (IVF) group. Group FNB (n=20) received 20 ml of 2% lignocaine around femoral nerve under ultrasound guidance. IVF group (n=20) received 2 mc/kg of fentanyl intravenously. Pain score on effected limb was assessed after five minutes. If VAS was ≤ 4, the patient was positioned in sitting for subarachnoid block. On failure to achieve this with the above treatment, intravenous fentanyl 0.5 mc/kg was administered and repeated as necessary before positioning. VAS during positioning was documented and compared between the two groups. Similarly, secondary outcomes of the intervention: quality of patient position, rescue analgesia and duration of the procedure were also compared. Data were subjected to Mann Whitney U-test and chi-square test. Level of significance was set at 0.05. Result FNB group had significantly less VAS scores (median) than IVF group :2 vs 3; p=0.037) during positioning for spinal anaesthesia. Procedure time (median) for spinal anaesthesia was also significantly less in FNB than in IVA group (10 vs 12 min; p=0.033) Conclusion Ultrasound guided femoral nerve block was more effective than intravenous fentanyl for reducing pain in patients with proximal femur fracture before spinal anaesthesia.
为行蛛网膜下腔阻滞的股骨骨折患者进行体位摆放会引起疼痛。静脉注射镇痛药或外周神经阻滞如股神经阻滞或髂筋膜间隙阻滞是一些可用于减轻疼痛的技术。我们比较了股神经阻滞和静脉注射芬太尼在蛛网膜下腔阻滞体位摆放前提供有效镇痛的效果。
本研究旨在比较超声引导下利多卡因股神经阻滞与静脉注射芬太尼在为股骨骨折患者坐位行蛛网膜下腔阻滞体位摆放前提供有效镇痛方面的效果。
40例行股骨骨折手术的患者被随机分为股神经阻滞(FNB)组或静脉注射芬太尼(IVF)组。FNB组(n = 20)在超声引导下于股神经周围注射20 ml 2%利多卡因。IVF组(n = 20)静脉注射2 μg/kg芬太尼。5分钟后评估患侧肢体的疼痛评分。如果视觉模拟评分(VAS)≤4,则将患者摆成坐位进行蛛网膜下腔阻滞。若上述治疗未能达到此效果,则静脉注射0.5 μg/kg芬太尼,并在体位摆放前根据需要重复给药。记录并比较两组体位摆放期间的VAS。同样,对干预的次要结果:患者体位质量、补救性镇痛和手术持续时间也进行了比较。数据采用曼-惠特尼U检验和卡方检验。显著性水平设定为0.05。
在脊髓麻醉体位摆放期间,FNB组的VAS评分(中位数)显著低于IVF组:分别为2和3;p = 0.037)。FNB组脊髓麻醉的手术时间(中位数)也显著短于IVA组(10分钟对12分钟;p = 0.033)
超声引导下股神经阻滞在脊髓麻醉前减轻股骨近端骨折患者疼痛方面比静脉注射芬太尼更有效。