Jeevendiran Annamale, Suganya Srinivasan, Sujatha Chinthavali, Rajaraman Jayashridevi, R Surya, Asokan Arthi, A Radhakrishnan
Anaesthesiology and Critical Care, Sri Venkateshwaraa Medical College Hospital and Research Centre, Puducherry, IND.
Anaesthesiology and Critical Care, Saveetha Medical College and Hospital, Chennai, IND.
Cureus. 2024 Mar 16;16(3):e56270. doi: 10.7759/cureus.56270. eCollection 2024 Mar.
Hip fractures cause severe pain during positioning for spinal anesthesia (SA). Intravenous systemic analgesics can lead to various complications in elderly patients, hence peripheral nerve blocks are emerging as a standard of care in pain management for hip fractures, among which femoral nerve block (FNB) is widely known and practiced. Pericapsular nerve group (PENG) block is a recently described technique that blocks the articular nerves of the hip with motor-sparing effects and is used to manage positional pain in hip fractures. This study aims to evaluate the analgesic efficacy of PENG block over FNB in managing pain during positioning before SA in hip fractures.
This was a prospective, randomized, double-blinded study. After ethical clearance, 70 patients undergoing hip fracture surgery under SA in a tertiary-care hospital were recruited and randomized to receive either ultrasound-guided PENG block or FNB with 20 ml of 0.25% bupivacaine before performing SA. We compared pain severity using the visual analog scale (VAS) 15 and 30 minutes after the block and during positioning. The sitting angle, requirement of rescue analgesia for positioning, and anesthesiologist and patient satisfaction scores were also analyzed. Continuous data were analyzed with an unpaired t-test while the chi-square test was used for categorical data.
There was a significant reduction in VAS scores after PENG block (PENG: 0.66 ± 1.05 and FNB: 1.94 ± 1.90; p = 0.001) with lesser requirement of rescue analgesia for positioning compared to FNB. The anesthesiologist and patient satisfaction scores were also significantly better in the PENG group.
PENG block offers better analgesia for positioning before SA than FNB without any significant side effects, and improves patient and anesthesiologist satisfaction, thus proving to be an effective analgesic alternative for painful hip fractures.
髋部骨折在脊髓麻醉(SA)定位期间会引起剧烈疼痛。静脉全身镇痛药可导致老年患者出现各种并发症,因此外周神经阻滞正在成为髋部骨折疼痛管理的标准治疗方法,其中股神经阻滞(FNB)广为人知且应用广泛。关节周围神经组(PENG)阻滞是一种最近描述的技术,可阻滞髋部的关节神经并具有保留运动功能的作用,用于管理髋部骨折的定位疼痛。本研究旨在评估PENG阻滞相对于FNB在髋部骨折SA前定位期间疼痛管理中的镇痛效果。
这是一项前瞻性、随机、双盲研究。获得伦理批准后,在一家三级医院招募了70例接受SA下髋部骨折手术的患者,并随机分为两组,在进行SA前分别接受超声引导下的PENG阻滞或20 ml 0.25%布比卡因的FNB。我们在阻滞15分钟和30分钟后以及定位期间使用视觉模拟量表(VAS)比较疼痛严重程度。还分析了坐姿角度、定位时急救镇痛的需求以及麻醉医生和患者的满意度评分。连续数据采用不成对t检验分析,分类数据采用卡方检验分析。
PENG阻滞后VAS评分显著降低(PENG组:0.66±l.05,FNB组:1.94±1.90;p = 0.001),与FNB相比,定位时急救镇痛的需求更少。PENG组的麻醉医生和患者满意度评分也显著更高。
PENG阻滞在SA前定位时比FNB提供更好的镇痛效果,且无任何明显副作用,提高了患者和麻醉医生的满意度,因此被证明是疼痛性髋部骨折的一种有效镇痛替代方法。