Jadon Ashok, Kedia Sunil Kumar, Dixit Shreya, Chakraborty Swastika
Department of Anesthesia, Tata Motors Hospital, Jamshedpur, Jharkhand, India.
Indian J Anaesth. 2014 Nov-Dec;58(6):705-8. doi: 10.4103/0019-5049.147146.
Spinal anaesthesia is the preferred technique to fix fracture of the femur. Extreme pain does not allow ideal positioning for this procedure. Intravenous fentanyl and femoral nerve block are commonly used techniques to reduce the pain during position for spinal anaesthesia however; results are conflicting regarding superiority of femoral nerve block over intravenous fentanyl.
We conducted this study to compare the analgesic effect provided by femoral nerve block (FNB) and intra- venous (IV) fentanyl prior to positioning for central neuraxial block in patients undergoing surgery for femur fracture.
In this randomized prospective study 60 patients scheduled for fracture femur operation under spinal were included. Patients were distributed in two groups through computer generated random numbers table; Femoral nerve block group (FNB) and Intravenous fentanyl group (FENT). In FNB group patients received FNB guided by a peripheral nerve stimulator (Stimuplex; B Braun, Melsungen, AG) 5 minutes prior to positioning. 20mL, 1.5% lidocaine with adrenaline (1:200,000) was injected incrementally after a negative aspiration test. Patients in the fentanyl group received injection fentanyl 1 μg/kg IV 5 mins prior to positioning. Spinal block was performed and pain scores before and during positioning were recorded. Statistical analysis was done with Sigmaplot version-10 computer software. Student t-test was applied to compare the means and P < 0.05 was taken as significant.
VAS during positioning in group FNB: 0.57 ± 0.31 versus FENT 2.53 ± 1.61 (P = 0.0020). Time to perform spinal anesthesia in group FNB: 15.33 ± 1.64 min versus FENT 19.56 ± 3.09 min (P = 0.000049). Quality of patient positioning for spinal anesthesia in group FNB 2.67± 0.606 versus FENT 1.967 ± 0.85 (P = 0.000027). Patient acceptance was less in group FENT (P = 0.000031).
Femoral nerve block provides better analgesia, patient satisfaction and satisfactory positioning than IV fentanyl for position during spinal anaesthesia in patients of fracture femur.
脊髓麻醉是治疗股骨骨折的首选技术。极度疼痛使得该手术难以实现理想的体位摆放。静脉注射芬太尼和股神经阻滞是在脊髓麻醉体位摆放过程中常用的减轻疼痛的技术,然而,关于股神经阻滞相对于静脉注射芬太尼的优越性,研究结果存在矛盾。
我们开展这项研究,以比较股神经阻滞(FNB)和静脉注射(IV)芬太尼在股骨骨折手术患者进行中枢神经轴阻滞体位摆放前提供的镇痛效果。
在这项随机前瞻性研究中,纳入了60例计划在脊髓麻醉下进行股骨骨折手术的患者。通过计算机生成的随机数字表将患者分为两组:股神经阻滞组(FNB)和静脉注射芬太尼组(FENT)。在FNB组中,患者在体位摆放前5分钟接受外周神经刺激器(Stimuplex;贝朗医疗,梅尔松根,股份公司)引导下的股神经阻滞。在回抽试验为阴性后,逐渐注射20mL 1.5%利多卡因加肾上腺素(1:200,000)。芬太尼组患者在体位摆放前5分钟静脉注射1μg/kg芬太尼。进行脊髓阻滞,并记录体位摆放前后的疼痛评分。使用SigmaPlot 10版计算机软件进行统计分析。应用学生t检验比较均值,P < 0.05为有统计学意义。
FNB组体位摆放期间的视觉模拟评分(VAS):0.57±0.31,而FENT组为2.53±1.61(P = 0.0020)。FNB组进行脊髓麻醉的时间:15.33±1.64分钟,而FENT组为19.56±3.09分钟(P = 0.000049)。FNB组脊髓麻醉患者体位摆放的质量为2.67±0.606,而FENT组为1.967±0.85(P = 0.000027)。FENT组患者的接受度较低(P = 0.000031)。
对于股骨骨折患者在脊髓麻醉体位摆放期间,股神经阻滞比静脉注射芬太尼提供更好的镇痛效果、患者满意度和满意的体位摆放。