Petitnicolas Clothilde, Azaïs Henri, Ghesquière Louise, Tresch-Bruneel Emmanuelle, Cordoba Abel, Narducci Fabrice, Bresson Lucie, Leblanc Eric
*Department of Gynecological Oncology Surgery, Centre de Lutte Contre le Cancer Oscar Lambret, Lille Cedex; †Department of Gynecology, Hôpital Jeanne de Flandre, CHRU Lille; and Departments of ‡Statistics and §Radiation Oncology, Centre de Lutte Contre le Cancer Oscar Lambret, Lille Cedex, France.
Int J Gynecol Cancer. 2017 Mar;27(3):575-580. doi: 10.1097/IGC.0000000000000921.
Extended-field chemoradiation is typically used for the management of patients with locally advanced cervical cancer. Given the low rate of skipped metastases above the inferior mesenteric artery, ilioinframesenteric dissection seems to be an acceptable pattern of paraaortic lymph node dissection (LND). Our objective is to compare the surgical morbidity of inframesenteric LND (IM-LND) with infrarenal LND (IR-LND).
In our center, all of the patients with locally advanced cervical cancer and negative magnetic resonance imaging and positron emission tomography-computed tomography imaging at the paraaortic level were offered laparoscopic staging including a diagnostic laparoscopy followed, if negative, by an extraperitoneal paraaortic lymphadenectomy. From January 2011 to September 2015, we included patients who had paraaortic LND from both common iliac bifurcations and divided them into 2 groups according to dissection pattern: to the inferior mesenteric artery (IM-LND) level or to the left renal vein (IR-LND) level. The perioperative and postoperative data were retrospectively recorded.
A total of 119 women were included in our study: 56 in the IM-LND group and 63 in the IR-LND group. There was no difference in the patients' characteristics between groups. Regarding the surgical procedure, the operating time was shorter in the IM-LND group than the IR-LND group, 174 ± 50 minutes versus 209 ± 61 minutes (P = 0.001), respectively. There was no significant difference in intra- and postoperative complications, overall survival, or progression-free survival.
In our series, exclusive IM-LND surgery is faster than IR-LND and results in similar morbidity and survival rates. These results confirm the feasibility and the applicability of IM-LND to simplify the surgical procedure without impacting survival. More patients should be included in the study to demonstrate the lower rate of morbidity.
扩大野放化疗通常用于局部晚期宫颈癌患者的治疗。鉴于肠系膜下动脉水平以上跳跃转移的发生率较低,回肠系膜下淋巴结清扫似乎是一种可接受的腹主动脉旁淋巴结清扫(LND)方式。我们的目的是比较肠系膜下淋巴结清扫(IM-LND)与肾下淋巴结清扫(IR-LND)的手术并发症。
在我们中心,所有局部晚期宫颈癌且腹主动脉旁水平磁共振成像和正电子发射断层扫描-计算机断层扫描成像为阴性的患者均接受腹腔镜分期,包括诊断性腹腔镜检查,若结果为阴性,则进行腹膜外腹主动脉旁淋巴结切除术。2011年1月至2015年9月,我们纳入了从双侧髂总动脉分叉处进行腹主动脉旁淋巴结清扫的患者,并根据清扫方式将其分为两组:至肠系膜下动脉(IM-LND)水平或至左肾静脉(IR-LND)水平。回顾性记录围手术期和术后数据。
我们的研究共纳入119名女性:IM-LND组56名,IR-LND组63名。两组患者的特征无差异。关于手术过程,IM-LND组的手术时间比IR-LND组短,分别为174±50分钟和209±61分钟(P = 0.001)。术中及术后并发症、总生存期或无进展生存期均无显著差异。
在我们的系列研究中,单纯IM-LND手术比IR-LND更快,且并发症发生率和生存率相似。这些结果证实了IM-LND在简化手术过程而不影响生存率方面的可行性和适用性。应纳入更多患者进行研究以证明更低的并发症发生率。