Dheur Adriane, Kakkos Athanasios, Danthine Denis, Delbecque Katty, Goffin Frédéric, Gonne Elodie, Lovinfosse Pierre, Pleyers Clémence, Thille Alain, Kridelka Frédéric, Gennigens Christine
Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, University Hospital of Liège, CHU Liège, Liège, Belgium.
Department of Radiology, University Hospital of Liège, CHU Liège, Liège, Belgium.
Front Oncol. 2024 Nov 11;14:1435532. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2024.1435532. eCollection 2024.
Cervical cancer (CC) is the fourth most common neoplasia in women worldwide. Although early-stage CC is often curable, 40 to 50% of patients are diagnosed at a locally advanced stage. Metastatic disease accounts for the principal cause of death. Lymph node (LN) status is a major factor impacting treatment options and prognosis. Historically, CC was staged based only on clinical findings. However, in 2018, imaging modalities and/or pathological findings were included in the International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) staging classification. In the last decades, LN status assessment has evolved considerably. Full pelvic lymphadenectomy used to be the only way to determine LN status. Currently, several options exist: surgery with full lymphadenectomy, sentinel lymph node (SLN) biopsy or imaging modalities such as computed tomography (CT), magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and positron emission tomography (PET). Regarding surgery, the SLN biopsy technique has become a standard procedure in cases of CC, with indocyanine green (ICG) being the preferred dye. Pelvic MRI is a valuable imaging technique modality for the evaluation of pelvic LNs. In locally advanced or in early-stage disease with suspicious LNs on CT scans or MRI, PET/CT is recommended for assessment of nodal and distant status. The best strategy for LN assessment remains a highly controversial topic in the literature. In this article, we aim to review and compare the advantages and limitations of each modality, i.e. imaging or surgical (lymphadenectomy or SLN biopsy) approaches.
宫颈癌(CC)是全球女性中第四大常见肿瘤。尽管早期宫颈癌通常可以治愈,但40%至50%的患者在局部晚期被诊断出来。转移性疾病是主要死因。淋巴结(LN)状态是影响治疗选择和预后的主要因素。历史上,宫颈癌仅根据临床检查结果进行分期。然而,2018年,国际妇产科联合会(FIGO)分期分类纳入了影像学检查和/或病理检查结果。在过去几十年中,LN状态评估有了很大进展。全盆腔淋巴结清扫术曾经是确定LN状态的唯一方法。目前有几种选择:全淋巴结清扫术、前哨淋巴结(SLN)活检或影像学检查,如计算机断层扫描(CT)、磁共振成像(MRI)和正电子发射断层扫描(PET)。关于手术,SLN活检技术已成为宫颈癌病例的标准程序,吲哚菁绿(ICG)是首选染料。盆腔MRI是评估盆腔LN的一种有价值的影像学技术。在局部晚期或CT扫描或MRI显示可疑LN的早期疾病中,建议使用PET/CT评估淋巴结和远处状态。LN评估的最佳策略在文献中仍然是一个极具争议的话题。在本文中,我们旨在回顾和比较每种方法(即影像学或手术方法,如淋巴结清扫术或SLN活检)的优缺点。