Yan Ruohua, Li Wei, Yin Lu, Wang Yang, Bo Jian
State Key Laboratory of Cardiovascular Disease, Fuwai Hospital, National Center for Cardiovascular Diseases, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China.
State Key Laboratory of Cardiovascular Disease, Fuwai Hospital, National Center for Cardiovascular Diseases, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China
J Am Heart Assoc. 2017 Feb 6;6(2):e004445. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.116.004445.
Most cardiovascular diseases occur in low- and middle-income regions of the world, but the socioeconomic distribution within China remains unclear. Our study aims to investigate whether the prevalence of cardiovascular diseases differs among high-, middle-, and low-income regions of China and to explore the reasons for the disparities.
We enrolled 46 285 individuals from 115 urban and rural communities in 12 provinces across China between 2005 and 2009. We recorded their medical histories of cardiovascular diseases and calculated the INTERHEART Risk Score for the assessment of cardiovascular risk-factor burden, with higher scores indicating greater burden. The mean INTERHEART Risk Score was higher in high- and middle-income regions than in low-income regions (9.47, 9.48, and 8.58, respectively, P<0.0001). By contrast, the prevalence of total cardiovascular disease (stroke, ischemic heart disease, and other heart diseases that led to hospitalization) was lower in high- and middle-income regions than in low-income regions (7.46%, 7.42%, and 8.36%, respectively, P=0.0064). In high- and middle-income regions, urban communities have higher INTERHEART Risk Score and higher prevalent rate than rural communities. In low-income regions, however, the prevalence of total cardiovascular disease was similar between urban and rural areas despite the significantly higher INTERHEART Risk Score for urban settings.
We detected an inverse trend between risk-factor burden and cardiovascular disease prevalence in urban and rural communities in high-, middle-, and low-income regions of China. Such asymmetry may be attributed to the interregional differences in residents' awareness, quality of healthcare, and availability and affordability of medical services.
大多数心血管疾病发生在世界中低收入地区,但中国国内的社会经济分布情况仍不清楚。我们的研究旨在调查中国高、中、低收入地区心血管疾病的患病率是否存在差异,并探讨造成这些差异的原因。
2005年至2009年间,我们在中国12个省份的115个城乡社区招募了46285名个体。我们记录了他们的心血管疾病病史,并计算了INTERHEART风险评分以评估心血管危险因素负担,分数越高表明负担越重。高收入和中等收入地区的平均INTERHEART风险评分高于低收入地区(分别为9.47、9.48和8.58,P<0.0001)。相比之下,高收入和中等收入地区的心血管疾病(中风、缺血性心脏病和其他导致住院的心脏病)总患病率低于低收入地区(分别为7.46%、7.42%和8.36%,P=0.0064)。在高收入和中等收入地区,城市社区的INTERHEART风险评分和患病率高于农村社区。然而,在低收入地区,尽管城市地区的INTERHEART风险评分显著更高,但城乡之间的心血管疾病总患病率相似。
我们在中国高、中、低收入地区的城乡社区中发现了危险因素负担与心血管疾病患病率之间的相反趋势。这种不对称可能归因于居民意识、医疗保健质量以及医疗服务的可及性和可负担性方面的地区差异。