Velásquez Ana Milena, Hoyos Bibian A
Facultad de Minas, Departamento de Procesos y Energía, Universidad Nacional de Colombia, Sede Medellín, Carrera 80 No. 65-223, 050041, Medellín, Colombia.
J Mol Model. 2017 Feb;23(2):58. doi: 10.1007/s00894-017-3223-1. Epub 2017 Feb 6.
Three methods of molecular dynamics simulation [Green-Kubo (G-K), non-equilibrium molecular dynamics (NEMD) and reversed non-equilibrium molecular dynamics (RNEMD)], and two group contribution methods [UNIFAC-VISCO and Grunberg-Nissan (G-N)] were used to calculate the viscosity of mixtures of n-heptane and toluene (known as heptol). The results obtained for the viscosity and density of heptol were compared with reported experimental data, and the advantages and disadvantages of each method are discussed. Overall, the five methods showed good agreement between calculated and experimental viscosities. In all cases, the deviation was lower than 9%. It was found that, as the concentration of toluene increases, the deviation of the density of the mixture (as calculated with molecular dynamics methods) also increases, which directly affects the viscosity result obtained. Among the molecular simulation techniques evaluated here, G-K produced the best results, and represents the optimal balance between quality of result and time required for simulation. The NEMD method produced acceptable results for the viscosity of the system but required more simulation time as well as the determination of an appropriate shear rate. The RNEMD method was fast and eliminated the need to determine a set of values for shear rate, but introduced large fluctuations in measurements of shear rate and viscosity. The two group contribution methods were accurate and fast when used to calculate viscosity, but require knowledge of the viscosity of the pure compounds, which is a serious limitation for applications in complex multicomponent systems.
采用三种分子动力学模拟方法[格林-库博(G-K)法、非平衡分子动力学(NEMD)法和反向非平衡分子动力学(RNEMD)法]以及两种基团贡献法[UNIFAC-VISCO法和格伦贝格-尼桑(G-N)法]来计算正庚烷与甲苯混合物(称为庚醇)的黏度。将庚醇黏度和密度的计算结果与已报道的实验数据进行比较,并讨论了每种方法的优缺点。总体而言,这五种方法计算得到的黏度与实验黏度吻合良好。在所有情况下,偏差均低于9%。研究发现,随着甲苯浓度的增加,混合物密度(用分子动力学方法计算)的偏差也会增大,这直接影响到所得到的黏度结果。在此评估的分子模拟技术中,G-K法得出的结果最佳,在结果质量和模拟所需时间之间达到了最佳平衡。NEMD法得出的系统黏度结果可接受,但需要更多的模拟时间以及确定合适的剪切速率。RNEMD法速度快,无需确定一组剪切速率值,但在剪切速率和黏度测量中引入了较大波动。两种基团贡献法在用于计算黏度时准确且快速,但需要知道纯化合物的黏度,这对于复杂多组分系统的应用来说是一个严重限制。