Lewis Lawrence M, Schloemann Derek T, Papa Linda, Fucetola Robert P, Bazarian Jeffrey, Lindburg Miranda, Welch Robert D
Division of Emergency Medicine, Washington University School of Medicine, Saint Louis, MO.
Department of Emergency Medicine, Orlando Regional Medical Center, Orlando, FL.
Acad Emerg Med. 2017 Jun;24(6):710-720. doi: 10.1111/acem.13174. Epub 2017 May 18.
The objective was to compare test characteristics of a single serum concentration of glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP), S-100β, and ubiquitin carboxyl terminal hydrolase L1 (UCH-L1), obtained within 6 hours of head injury, to diagnose mild traumatic brain injury (mTBI) in head-injured subjects.
Adults aged 18 to 80 years who presented to one of seven EDs with a blunt closed head injury underwent head CT within 4 hours of injury and had blood drawn for biomarker analysis within 6 hours of injury were eligible. Subjects were considered to have mTBI if they had an initial Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) > 13 and met one or more of the following criteria: loss of consciousness (LOC), posttraumatic amnesia, or confusion. Subjects with mTBI and an abnormal head computed tomography (CT) scan were categorized as complicated mTBI; those with a normal head CT were categorized as uncomplicated mTBI; and subjects with a GCS = 15, no LOC, no posttraumatic amnesia, and no confusion were considered to not have a mTBI. Biomarker concentration measurements for GFAP and UCH-L1 were performed using an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay. S-100β concentration was determined using an electrochemiluminescence immunoassay. Median biomarker concentration for each group was compared using the Kruskal-Wallis test. Logistic regression was used to determine area under the receiver operating curve (AUC) for each of the three biomarkers. Sensitivity, specificity, negative predictive value (NPV), positive predictive value (PPV), and negative and positive likelihood ratios (LRs) for the three biomarkers to differentiate between complicated mTBI, uncomplicated mTBI, and no mTBI were calculated.
A total of 247 subjects were enrolled and had adequate clinical and biomarker information for analysis. A total of 188 met criteria for mTBI, with 34 (18.1%) having an acute abnormality on CT (complicated mTBI). The mean (±SD) age of the study population was 45.8 (±17.3) years, and 59.9% were male. Median serum concentrations for all biomarkers were significantly different between groups, lowest in the no mTBI group, and progressively increasing in the uncomplicated and complicated mTBI groups (p < 0.0001). All three biomarkers were significant classifiers of mTBI versus no mTBI, with the following AUCs: GFAP, 0.70; S-100β, 0.69; and UCH-L1, 0.65 (p = 0.17). Sensitivity for mTBI was highest for S-100β (96.5%). NPVs ranged from 31% for UCH-L1 to 35% for GFAP. PPVs ranged from 75.5% for S-100β to 96.5% for GFAP. Negative LR ranged from 0.59 for GFAP to 0.71 for UCH-L1, with positive LR ranging from 1.0 for both UCH-L1 and S-100β to 8.7 for GFAP.
A single serum concentration of GFAP, UCH-L1, or S-100β within 6 hours of head injury may be useful in identifying and stratifying the severity of brain injury in emergency department patients with head trauma, but cannot reliably exclude a diagnosis of concussion. A positive GFAP was associated with the presence of concussion.
比较在头部受伤后6小时内测得的单一血清浓度的胶质纤维酸性蛋白(GFAP)、S-100β和泛素羧基末端水解酶L1(UCH-L1)的检测特征,以诊断头部受伤患者的轻度创伤性脑损伤(mTBI)。
年龄在18至80岁之间、因钝性闭合性头部损伤到七家急诊科之一就诊的成年人,在受伤后4小时内接受头部CT检查,并在受伤后6小时内抽血进行生物标志物分析,符合这些条件的患者纳入研究。如果患者初始格拉斯哥昏迷量表(GCS)>13且符合以下一项或多项标准,则被认为患有mTBI:意识丧失(LOC)、创伤后遗忘或意识模糊。mTBI且头部计算机断层扫描(CT)异常的患者被归类为复杂性mTBI;头部CT正常的患者被归类为非复杂性mTBI;GCS = 15、无LOC、无创伤后遗忘且无意识模糊的患者被认为没有mTBI。使用酶联免疫吸附测定法进行GFAP和UCH-L1的生物标志物浓度测量。使用电化学发光免疫测定法测定S-100β浓度。使用Kruskal-Wallis检验比较每组生物标志物的中位数浓度。使用逻辑回归确定三种生物标志物各自的受试者工作曲线下面积(AUC)。计算三种生物标志物区分复杂性mTBI、非复杂性mTBI和无mTBI的敏感性、特异性、阴性预测值(NPV)、阳性预测值(PPV)以及阴性和阳性似然比(LR)。
共纳入247名受试者,他们有足够的临床和生物标志物信息用于分析。共有188名符合mTBI标准,其中34名(18.1%)CT显示急性异常(复杂性mTBI)。研究人群的平均(±标准差)年龄为45.8(±17.3)岁,59.9%为男性。所有生物标志物的血清中位数浓度在各组之间存在显著差异,在无mTBI组中最低,在非复杂性和复杂性mTBI组中逐渐升高(p < 0.0001)。所有三种生物标志物都是mTBI与无mTBI的显著分类指标,其AUC如下:GFAP为0.70;S-100β为0.69;UCH-L1为0.65(p = 0.17)。S-100β对mTBI的敏感性最高(96.5%)。NPV范围从UCH-L1的31%到GFAP的35%。PPV范围从S-100β的75.5%到GFAP的96.5%。阴性LR范围从GFAP的0.59到UCH-L1的0.71,阳性LR范围从UCH-L1和S-100β的1.0到GFAP的8.7。
头部受伤后6小时内单一血清浓度的GFAP、UCH-L1或S-100β可能有助于识别和分层急诊科头部创伤患者的脑损伤严重程度,但不能可靠地排除脑震荡的诊断。GFAP阳性与脑震荡的存在相关。