Mosbech H, Dreborg S, Frølund L, Ljungstedt-Påhlman I, Svendsen U G, Søborg M, Taudorf E, Weeke B
Allergy Unit 7511, Medical Dept. TTA, State University Hospital, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Allergy. 1989 Sep;44(7):499-509. doi: 10.1111/j.1398-9995.1989.tb04189.x.
In a 2-year study, 46 asthmatics with verified allergy to the house dust mite D. pteronyssinus (Dp) were included either as controls (Ctls) or receiving hyposensitization (HS) with unmodified or monomethoxypolyethylene glycol (mPEG) modified Dp-extract. Patients were monitored by annual challenges with histamine in bronchi, and Dp allergen in bronchi, nose and conjunctiva. mPEG-modified extract was not inferior to unmodified Dp-extract; both were to some extent able to improve tolerance to Dp and histamine in bronchi and to Dp in nose and eyes. During the 1st year, the bronchial sensitivity to Dp decreased significantly in the HS groups but not in the Ctls. During the 2nd year, improvement was more pronounced in the Ctl group. The relative increase in Dp or histamine tolerance did not differ significantly between groups after either 1 or 2 years; the only exception was conjunctival sensitivity, which in the Ctl group was unchanged, and a 10-fold increase in tolerance in the HS groups. No direct benefit was seen on late-phase bronchial reactions. In patients with improved pulmonary symptoms a tendency was seen towards reduced sensitivity to histamine and Dp. Variation within groups was extensive.
在一项为期两年的研究中,纳入了46名已证实对屋尘螨粉尘螨(Dp)过敏的哮喘患者,他们要么作为对照组(Ctls),要么接受未修饰或单甲氧基聚乙二醇(mPEG)修饰的Dp提取物进行脱敏治疗(HS)。通过每年对支气管中的组胺以及支气管、鼻子和结膜中的Dp变应原进行激发试验来监测患者。mPEG修饰的提取物并不逊于未修饰的Dp提取物;两者在一定程度上都能够提高对支气管中的Dp和组胺以及鼻子和眼睛中的Dp的耐受性。在第一年,HS组中对Dp的支气管敏感性显著降低,而对照组中则没有。在第二年,对照组的改善更为明显。1年或2年后,各组之间Dp或组胺耐受性的相对增加没有显著差异;唯一的例外是结膜敏感性,对照组中结膜敏感性没有变化,而HS组中的耐受性增加了10倍。在迟发性支气管反应方面未观察到直接益处。在肺部症状有所改善的患者中,对组胺和Dp的敏感性有降低的趋势。组内差异很大。