健康研究人员对比较有效性研究和研究参与的看法。
Health researcher views on comparative effectiveness research and research engagement.
机构信息
Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute, 1828 L Street NW, Suite 900, Washington, DC 20036, USA.
American Institutes for Research, 1025 Thomas Jefferson St NW, Suite 3290, Washington, DC 20007, USA.
出版信息
J Comp Eff Res. 2017 May;6(3):245-256. doi: 10.2217/cer-2016-0063. Epub 2017 Feb 8.
AIM
To understand researcher capability for and interest in patient-centered comparative effectiveness research (PC-CER), particularly related to engaging with patients/caregivers.
MATERIALS & METHODS: Web-based survey of 508 health researchers recruited via professional health research organizations.
RESULTS
Most respondents (94%) were familiar with CER and many (69%) reported having previously conducting some form of CER. Most respondents were familiar with (81%) and interested in (87%) partnering with patients and/or caregivers in research. Resources to assist in training, coordination of partners, guidance in apply for funding and improved infrastructure were commonly cited factors that would help researchers conduct PC-CER.
CONCLUSION
There is a significant opportunity for researchers to engage patients and caregivers as partners in CER. Researchers recognize the need for additional training and expertise to leverage those opportunities.
目的
了解研究人员在以患者为中心的药物比较效果研究（PC-CER）方面的能力和兴趣，特别是与患者/护理人员合作方面。
材料与方法
通过专业的健康研究组织，以网络为基础对 508 名健康研究人员进行调查。
结果
大多数受访者（94%）熟悉 CER，许多人（69%）表示之前曾进行过某种形式的 CER。大多数受访者熟悉（81%）并对（87%）与患者和/或护理人员合作开展研究感兴趣。帮助培训、协调合作伙伴、指导申请资金以及改善基础设施的资源，通常被认为是有助于研究人员开展 PC-CER 的因素。
结论
研究人员有很大的机会让患者和护理人员作为合作伙伴参与 CER。研究人员认识到需要额外的培训和专业知识来利用这些机会。
Zotero 插件