• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Clinician engagement in research as a path toward the learning health system: A regional survey across the northwestern United States.临床医生参与研究以迈向学习型医疗体系:美国西北部地区的一项区域性调查。
Health Serv Manage Res. 2020 Feb;33(1):33-42. doi: 10.1177/0951484819858830. Epub 2019 Aug 18.
2
Practitioner Participation in National Dental Practice-based Research Network (PBRN) Studies: 12-Year Results.从业者参与国家牙科实践为基础的研究网络(PBRN)研究:12 年结果。
J Am Board Fam Med. 2018 Nov-Dec;31(6):844-856. doi: 10.3122/jabfm.2018.06.180019.
3
PaTH to partnership in stakeholder-engaged research: A framework for stakeholder engagement in the PaTH to Health Diabetes study.利益相关者参与研究的伙伴关系之路:在 Path to Health Diabetes 研究中利益相关者参与的框架。
Healthc (Amst). 2020 Mar;8(1):100361. doi: 10.1016/j.hjdsi.2019.05.001. Epub 2019 May 14.
4
A Practical Approach to Establishing a Practice-Based Research Network Stakeholder Engagement Infrastructure.建立基于实践的研究网络利益相关者参与基础设施的实用方法。
J Am Board Fam Med. 2019 Sep-Oct;32(5):695-704. doi: 10.3122/jabfm.2019.05.190046.
5
Online patient feedback: a scoping review and stakeholder consultation to guide health policy.在线患者反馈:一项范围界定审查及利益相关者咨询以指导卫生政策
J Health Serv Res Policy. 2020 Apr;25(2):122-129. doi: 10.1177/1355819619870837. Epub 2019 Sep 7.
6
PARENTS 2 study: consensus report for parental engagement in the perinatal mortality review process.PARENTS 2 研究:围产期死亡评审过程中父母参与的共识报告。
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2019 Aug;54(2):215-224. doi: 10.1002/uog.20139.
7
Leader-member exchange and organizational climate effects on clinician turnover intentions.领导成员交换关系和组织氛围对临床医生离职意向的影响。
J Health Organ Manag. 2020 Dec 1;35(1):68-87. doi: 10.1108/JHOM-10-2019-0311.
8
Perspectives of four stakeholder groups about the participation of female forest landowners in forest management in Georgia, United States.美国乔治亚州四个利益相关者群体对女性林地所有者参与森林管理的看法。
PLoS One. 2021 Aug 24;16(8):e0256654. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0256654. eCollection 2021.
9
Factors affecting engagement between academic faculty and decision-makers: learnings and priorities for a school of public health.影响学术教师与决策者参与的因素:公共卫生学院的经验教训和优先事项。
Health Res Policy Syst. 2018 Jul 25;16(1):65. doi: 10.1186/s12961-018-0342-9.
10
Clinical Trials in the Era of Digital Engagement: A SWOG Call to Action.数字参与时代的临床试验:SWOG行动呼吁
JCO Clin Cancer Inform. 2020 Mar;4:254-258. doi: 10.1200/CCI.19.00128.

引用本文的文献

1
Operationalising routinely collected patient data in research to further the pursuit of social justice and health equity: a team-based scoping review.将常规收集的患者数据用于研究以促进社会正义和健康公平的实施:一项基于团队的范围综述。
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2025 Jan 21;25(1):14. doi: 10.1186/s12874-025-02466-9.
2
Barriers and Enablers of Primary Healthcare Professionals in Health Research Engagement: A Systematic Review of Qualitative Studies.初级医疗保健专业人员参与健康研究的障碍与促进因素:定性研究的系统综述
Nurs Health Sci. 2025 Mar;27(1):e70022. doi: 10.1111/nhs.70022.
3
Engaging primary care professionals in OECD's international PaRIS survey: a documentary analysis.参与经合组织国际 PaRIS 调查的初级保健专业人员:文献分析。
Health Res Policy Syst. 2024 Jul 4;22(1):76. doi: 10.1186/s12961-024-01170-2.
4
Meaningful coproduction with clinicians: establishing a practice-based research network with physiotherapists in regional Australia.与临床医生进行有意义的合作:在澳大利亚地区建立一个与物理治疗师合作的基于实践的研究网络。
Health Res Policy Syst. 2023 May 26;21(1):38. doi: 10.1186/s12961-023-00983-x.
5
Attitudes of primary healthcare chief physicians towards research in Finland - a national study.初级保健首席医师对芬兰研究的态度-一项全国性研究。
Scand J Prim Health Care. 2023 Jun;41(2):140-151. doi: 10.1080/02813432.2023.2196537. Epub 2023 Apr 18.
6
The Science of Learning Health Systems: Scoping Review of Empirical Research.学习型健康系统科学:实证研究的范围综述
JMIR Med Inform. 2022 Feb 23;10(2):e34907. doi: 10.2196/34907.
7
"There hasn't been a career structure to step into": a qualitative study on perceptions of allied health clinician researcher careers.“没有可供进入的职业结构”:一项关于对联合健康临床医生研究人员职业看法的定性研究。
Health Res Policy Syst. 2022 Jan 9;20(1):6. doi: 10.1186/s12961-021-00801-2.
8
Options for Meaningful Engagement in Clinical Research for Busy Frontline Clinicians.忙碌一线临床医生参与临床研究的有意义选择。
J Gen Intern Med. 2021 Jul;36(7):2100-2104. doi: 10.1007/s11606-020-06587-3. Epub 2021 Feb 2.
9
Advancing Rehabilitation Practice Using Embedded Learning Health System Researchers.利用嵌入式学习健康系统研究人员推进康复实践
Phys Ther. 2021 Jun 1;101(6). doi: 10.1093/ptj/pzab029.
10
Feasibility of connecting regional research programs to national multisite trials emanating from the CTSA Trial Innovation Network.将区域研究项目与源自临床与转化科学奖(CTSA)试验创新网络的全国多中心试验相连接的可行性。
J Clin Transl Sci. 2020 Jan 24;4(2):75-80. doi: 10.1017/cts.2019.437. eCollection 2020 Apr.

本文引用的文献

1
The Northwest Participant and Clinical Interactions Network: Increasing opportunities for patients to participate in research across the Northwestern United States.西北参与者与临床互动网络:增加美国西北部患者参与研究的机会。
J Clin Transl Sci. 2017 Apr;1(2):94-100. doi: 10.1017/cts.2016.18. Epub 2017 Apr 19.
2
Patient, caregiver and clinician views on engagement in comparative effectiveness research.患者、照护者和临床医生对参与比较效果研究的看法。
J Comp Eff Res. 2017 May;6(3):231-244. doi: 10.2217/cer-2016-0062. Epub 2017 Feb 8.
3
Health researcher views on comparative effectiveness research and research engagement.健康研究人员对比较有效性研究和研究参与的看法。
J Comp Eff Res. 2017 May;6(3):245-256. doi: 10.2217/cer-2016-0063. Epub 2017 Feb 8.
4
Moving beyond 'not enough time': factors influencing paediatric clinicians' participation in research.超越“时间不足”:影响儿科临床医生参与研究的因素
Intern Med J. 2017 Mar;47(3):299-306. doi: 10.1111/imj.13351.
5
Resident research: why some do and others don't.住院医师研究:为何有些人做而有些人不做。
Singapore Med J. 2017 Apr;58(4):212-217. doi: 10.11622/smedj.2016059. Epub 2016 Mar 15.
6
Clinician and Staff Perspectives on Participating in Practice-based Research (PBR): A Report from the Wisconsin Research and Education Network (WREN).临床医生和工作人员对参与基于实践的研究(PBR)的看法:来自威斯康星研究与教育网络(WREN)的报告。
J Am Board Fam Med. 2015 Sep-Oct;28(5):639-48. doi: 10.3122/jabfm.2015.05.150038.
7
Patient and clinician views on comparative effectiveness research and engagement in research.患者与临床医生对比较效果研究及参与研究的看法。
J Comp Eff Res. 2015 Jan;4(1):11-25. doi: 10.2217/cer.14.52.
8
From triple to quadruple aim: care of the patient requires care of the provider.从三重目标到四重目标:照顾患者需要照顾医疗服务提供者。
Ann Fam Med. 2014 Nov-Dec;12(6):573-6. doi: 10.1370/afm.1713.
9
Toward a science of learning systems: a research agenda for the high-functioning Learning Health System.迈向学习系统科学:高效学习型健康系统的研究议程。
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2015 Jan;22(1):43-50. doi: 10.1136/amiajnl-2014-002977. Epub 2014 Oct 23.
10
Rapid learning: a breakthrough agenda.快速学习:一项突破性议程。
Health Aff (Millwood). 2014 Jul;33(7):1155-62. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2014.0043.

临床医生参与研究以迈向学习型医疗体系:美国西北部地区的一项区域性调查。

Clinician engagement in research as a path toward the learning health system: A regional survey across the northwestern United States.

机构信息

AMGA Analytics, AMGA (American Medical Group Association), Alexandria, VA, USA.

Collaborative Science and Innovation, Billings Clinic, Billings, MT, USA.

出版信息

Health Serv Manage Res. 2020 Feb;33(1):33-42. doi: 10.1177/0951484819858830. Epub 2019 Aug 18.

DOI:10.1177/0951484819858830
PMID:31422696
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10729705/
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

: Increased research engagement of frontline, community-based clinicians could result in greater research relevancy, increased likelihood of implementation into practice, and improved health care for patients. Establishment of learning health systems within health-care organizations may facilitate this process.

METHODS

: In 2016, the U.S. Northwest Participant and Clinical Interactions Network conducted a region-wide survey in four community-based health systems to identify barriers to clinician involvement in research and understand clinician interest and levels of engagement.

RESULTS

: Survey responses indicated broad interest in research’s value to patients (77% of respondents), contribution to clinical evidence (79%), and fulfillment of intellectual curiosity (77%). Engagement was not always correlated with interest. Top barriers included time (65%), support (34%), and getting started (32%).

CONCLUSION

: In community health systems in the northwestern United States, clinician interest in research exists but with several significant barriers. Leveraging the learning health system movement may be one way to increase focus on research and address identified barriers.

摘要

简介

增加一线社区临床医生的研究参与度,可能会提高研究的相关性,增加研究成果在实践中应用的可能性,并改善患者的医疗服务。在医疗保健组织中建立学习型医疗体系可能会促进这一过程。

方法

2016 年,美国西北参与者和临床互动网络在四个社区医疗系统中进行了一项全区域调查,以确定临床医生参与研究的障碍,并了解临床医生的兴趣和参与程度。

结果

调查结果表明,临床医生普遍认为研究对患者有价值(77%的受访者),对临床证据有贡献(79%),并能满足他们的求知欲(77%)。但参与度并不总是与兴趣相关。最大的障碍包括时间(65%)、支持(34%)和起步(32%)。

结论

在美国西北部的社区医疗系统中,临床医生对研究有兴趣,但存在一些重大障碍。利用学习型医疗体系运动可能是提高对研究的重视和解决已确定障碍的一种方式。