Farkas Kata, Hassard Francis, McDonald James E, Malham Shelagh K, Jones Davey L
School of Environment, Natural Resources and Geography, Bangor University Bangor, Wales.
School of Ocean Sciences, Bangor University Bangor, Wales.
Front Microbiol. 2017 Jan 24;8:53. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2017.00053. eCollection 2017.
The accurate detection of pathogens in environmental matrices, such as sediment, is critical in understanding pathogen fate and behavior in the environment. In this study, we assessed the usefulness of methods for the detection and quantification of spp. and norovirus (NoV) nucleic acids in sediment. For bacteria, a commonly used direct method using hexadecyltrimethylammonium bromide (CTAB) and phenol-chloroform-isoamyl alcohol (PCI) extraction was optimized, whereas for NoV, direct and indirect (virus elution-concentration) methods were evaluated. For quantification, commercially available quantitative PCR (qPCR) and reverse transcription qPCR (RT-qPCR) kits were tested alongside a digital PCR (dPCR) approach. CTAB-based extraction combined with 16 h polyethylene glycol 6000 (PEG6000) precipitation was found to be suitable for the direct extraction of high abundance bacterial and viral nucleic acids. For the indirect extraction of viral RNA, beef extract-based elution followed by PEG6000 precipitation and extraction using the NucliSENS® MiniMag® Nucleic Acid Purification System and the PowerViral® Environmental RNA/DNA Isolation Kit and qRT-PCR resulted in 83-112 and 63-69% recoveries of NoV, respectively. dPCR resulted in lower viral recoveries (47 and 9%) and ~4 orders of magnitude lower concentrations (3.6-4.6 log gc/100 g sediment) than was observed using qPCR. The use of internal controls during viral quantification revealed that the RT step was more affected by inhibitors than the amplification. The methods described here are suitable for the enumeration of viral and/or bacterial pathogens in sediment, however the use of internal controls to assess efficiency is recommended.
准确检测环境基质(如沉积物)中的病原体对于了解病原体在环境中的归宿和行为至关重要。在本研究中,我们评估了沉积物中 spp. 和诺如病毒(NoV)核酸检测和定量方法的实用性。对于细菌,优化了一种常用的使用十六烷基三甲基溴化铵(CTAB)和苯酚 - 氯仿 - 异戊醇(PCI)提取的直接方法,而对于NoV,则评估了直接和间接(病毒洗脱 - 浓缩)方法。对于定量,测试了市售的定量PCR(qPCR)和逆转录qPCR(RT - qPCR)试剂盒以及数字PCR(dPCR)方法。发现基于CTAB的提取结合16小时聚乙二醇6000(PEG6000)沉淀适用于直接提取高丰度细菌和病毒核酸。对于病毒RNA的间接提取,基于牛肉提取物的洗脱,然后进行PEG6000沉淀,并使用NucliSENS® MiniMag®核酸纯化系统和PowerViral®环境RNA/DNA分离试剂盒以及qRT - PCR,NoV的回收率分别为83 - 112%和63 - 69%。与使用qPCR观察到的结果相比,dPCR导致病毒回收率较低(47%和9%),且浓度低约4个数量级(3.6 - 4.6 log gc/100 g沉积物)。病毒定量过程中使用内部对照表明,RT步骤比扩增步骤更受抑制剂影响。这里描述的方法适用于沉积物中病毒和/或细菌病原体的计数,然而建议使用内部对照来评估效率。