Tosato Matteo, Marzetti Emanuele, Cesari Matteo, Savera Giulia, Miller Ram R, Bernabei Roberto, Landi Francesco, Calvani Riccardo
Department of Geriatrics, Neurosciences and Orthopedics, Catholic University of the Sacred Heart School of Medicine, Rome, Italy.
Gérontopôle, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Toulouse, Toulouse, France.
Aging Clin Exp Res. 2017 Feb;29(1):19-27. doi: 10.1007/s40520-016-0717-0. Epub 2017 Feb 7.
Sarcopenia encompasses the loss of muscle mass and strength/function during aging. Several methods are available for the estimation of muscle or lean body mass. Popular assessment tools include body imaging techniques (e.g., magnetic resonance imaging, computed tomography, dual X-ray absorptiometry, ultrasonography), bioelectric impedance analysis, anthropometric parameters (e.g., calf circumference, mid-arm muscle circumference), and biochemical markers (total or partial body potassium, serum and urinary creatinine, deuterated creatine dilution method). The heterogeneity of the populations to be evaluated as well as the setting in which sarcopenia is investigated impacts the definition of "gold standard" assessment techniques. The aim of this article is to critically review available methods for muscle mass estimation, highlighting strengths and weaknesses of each of them as well as their proposed field of application.
肌肉减少症包括衰老过程中肌肉质量和力量/功能的丧失。有几种方法可用于估计肌肉或去脂体重。常用的评估工具包括身体成像技术(如磁共振成像、计算机断层扫描、双能X线吸收法、超声检查)、生物电阻抗分析、人体测量参数(如小腿围、上臂中部肌肉围)和生化标志物(全身或局部钾、血清和尿肌酐、氘代肌酸稀释法)。待评估人群的异质性以及研究肌肉减少症的环境会影响“金标准”评估技术的定义。本文的目的是批判性地回顾现有的肌肉质量估计方法,突出每种方法的优缺点及其建议的应用领域。