Grenier Amanda, Lloyd Liz, Phillipson Chris
Department of Health, Aging and Society and Gilbrea Centre for Studies in Aging, McMaster University, Canada.
School for Policy Studies, University of Bristol, UK.
Sociol Health Illn. 2017 Feb;39(2):318-330. doi: 10.1111/1467-9566.12476.
Approaches to ageing that are organised around productivity, success, and active late life have contributed to views of dementia as an unsuccessful, failed or 'frailed' old age. Operating through dominant frameworks, socio-cultural constructs and organisational practices, the 'frailties' of the body and mind are often used to mark the boundaries of health and illness in late life, and shape responses accordingly. Our concern is that both the taken for granted and the 'imagined' can further marginalise persons who occupy the locations of dementia and disablement. This article analyses the extent to which frailty and dementia are better understood in the context of new forms of insecurity affecting the life course. Drawing on the concept of 'precarity', this article shifts debates on the 'fourth age' away from age or stage-based thinking, into a recognition of the shared vulnerability and responsibilities for care. The argument of this article is that 'precarity' represents a 'new form of ageing', notably as regards its impact on the upper extremes of the life course. The article concludes with a call for a response that is grounded in an acknowledgement of the fragility and limitations which affect human lives, this requiring grounding in inclusive forms of citizenship.
围绕生产力、成功和积极的晚年生活所构建的衰老观念,导致了将痴呆症视为不成功、失败或“脆弱”的老年阶段的观点。通过主导框架、社会文化建构和组织实践发挥作用,身体和精神的“脆弱性”常常被用来划分晚年健康与疾病的界限,并相应地塑造应对方式。我们担心的是,那些被视为理所当然的以及“想象中的”观念,可能会进一步边缘化患有痴呆症和残疾的人群。本文分析了在影响人生历程的新形式不安全因素背景下,对脆弱性和痴呆症的理解能达到何种程度。借鉴“不稳定”这一概念,本文将关于“第四年龄”的辩论从基于年龄或阶段的思维方式,转向认识到共同的脆弱性以及护理责任。本文的论点是,“不稳定”代表了一种“新的衰老形式”,尤其是在其对人生历程上限的影响方面。文章最后呼吁做出一种回应,这种回应基于对影响人类生活的脆弱性和局限性的承认,而这需要以包容性的公民身份形式为基础。