Yeo SeonAe, Walker Jennifer S, Caughey Melissa C, Ferraro Amanda M, Asafu-Adjei Josephine K
School of Nursing, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA.
Health Science Library, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA.
Obes Rev. 2017 Apr;18(4):385-399. doi: 10.1111/obr.12511. Epub 2017 Feb 8.
Lifestyle interventions targeting gestational weight gain (GWG) report varying degrees of success. To better understand factors influencing efficacy, we reviewed randomized trials specifically among obese and overweight pregnant women.
We conducted a systematic review and a meta-analysis of 32 studies with a pooled population of 5,869 overweight or obese pregnant women. Random effects models were fit to compute the weighted mean difference (WMD) in GWG between groups across studies. Subgroup analyses were conducted to compare intervention efficacy in overweight vs. obese pregnant women, and interventions delivered by prenatal care providers (PCPs) vs. non-PCPs during pregnancy. Moderator analyses ensured.
Nine (28%) of 32 studies reported significant reductions in GWG in response to intervention. Of these, six (66%) of nine were delivered by PCPs. Overall, the WMD in GWG was -1.71 (95% confidence interval [CI]: -2.55, -0.86) kg. However, interventions delivered by PCPs yielded a significantly greater reduction in GWG compared to interventions delivered by non-PCPs (WMD = -3.88 kg; 95% CI: -7.01, -0.75 vs. -0.80 kg; 95% CI: -1.32, -0.28; p for difference = 0.005).
When PCPs counsel nutrition and physical activity, obese and overweight pregnant women have greater success meeting GWG targets and may be more motivated to modify their behaviour than with other modes of intervention deliveries.
针对孕期体重增加(GWG)的生活方式干预取得了不同程度的成功。为了更好地理解影响疗效的因素,我们回顾了专门针对肥胖和超重孕妇的随机试验。
我们对32项研究进行了系统评价和荟萃分析,汇总人群为5869名超重或肥胖孕妇。采用随机效应模型计算各研究组间GWG的加权平均差(WMD)。进行亚组分析以比较超重与肥胖孕妇的干预效果,以及孕期由产前护理提供者(PCP)与非PCP实施的干预效果。进行了调节因素分析。
32项研究中有9项(28%)报告干预后GWG显著降低。其中,9项中有6项(66%)由PCP实施。总体而言,GWG的WMD为-1.71(95%置信区间[CI]:-2.55,-0.86)kg。然而,与非PCP实施的干预相比,PCP实施的干预使GWG降低得更显著(WMD = -3.88 kg;95% CI:-7.01,-0.75 vs. -0.80 kg;95% CI:-1.32,-0.28;差异p = 0.005)。
当PCP提供营养和体育活动咨询时,肥胖和超重孕妇在实现GWG目标方面更成功,并且与其他干预方式相比,她们可能更有动力改变自己的行为。