• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

益生菌在体外可抑制牛呼吸道病原体溶血曼氏杆菌1型。

Probiotic bacteria inhibit the bovine respiratory pathogen Mannheimia haemolytica serotype 1 in vitro.

作者信息

Amat S, Subramanian S, Timsit E, Alexander T W

机构信息

Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada, Lethbridge, AB, Canada.

Department of Production Animal Health, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada.

出版信息

Lett Appl Microbiol. 2017 May;64(5):343-349. doi: 10.1111/lam.12723.

DOI:10.1111/lam.12723
PMID:28178767
Abstract

UNLABELLED

This study evaluated the potential of probiotic bacteria to inhibit growth and cell adhesion of the bovine respiratory pathogen Mannheimia haemoltyica serotype 1. The inhibitory effects of nine probiotic strains (Lactobacillus acidophilus, Lactobacillus casei, Lactobacillus helveticus, Lactobacillus plantarum, Lactobacillus rhamnosus, Lactococcus lactis, Streptococcus thermophilus and two Paenibacillus polymyxa strains) against M. haemolytica were evaluated using a spot-on-lawn method. Probiotic strains were then tested for their adherence to bovine bronchial epithelial (BBE) cells and the ability to displace and compete against M. haemolytica on BBE. Except for S. thermophilus, all probiotic strains inhibited the growth of M. haemolytica, with zones of inhibition ranging between 12 and 19 mm. Lactobacillus strains and Lactococcus lactis displayed greater (P < 0·05) BBE adhesion compared with M. heamolytica (8·3%) and other probiotics (<2·2%). Strains of P. polymyxa and L. acidophilus caused the greatest reduction in M. haemolytica adherence, through both displacement and competition, compared with other probiotics. The results of this study suggest that probiotics may have the potential to colonize the bovine respiratory tract, and exert antagonistic effects against M. haemolytica serotype 1.

SIGNIFICANCE AND IMPACT OF THE STUDY

A common method to control bovine respiratory disease (BRD) in feedlots is through mass medication with antibiotics upon cattle entry (i.e. metaphylaxis). Increasingly, antimicrobial resistance in BRD bacterial pathogens has been observed in feedlots, which may have important implications for cattle health. In this study, probiotic strains were shown to adhere to bovine respiratory cells and inhibit the BRD pathogen M. haemolytica serotype 1 through competition and displacement. Probiotics may therefore offer a mitigation strategy to reduce BRD bacterial pathogens, in place of metaphylactic antimicrobials.

摘要

未标记

本研究评估了益生菌抑制牛呼吸道病原体溶血曼氏杆菌1型生长和细胞黏附的潜力。使用点种法评估了9种益生菌菌株(嗜酸乳杆菌、干酪乳杆菌、瑞士乳杆菌、植物乳杆菌、鼠李糖乳杆菌、乳酸乳球菌、嗜热链球菌和两株多粘芽孢杆菌)对溶血曼氏杆菌的抑制作用。随后测试了益生菌菌株对牛支气管上皮(BBE)细胞的黏附能力,以及在BBE细胞上取代和竞争溶血曼氏杆菌的能力。除嗜热链球菌外,所有益生菌菌株均抑制了溶血曼氏杆菌的生长,抑菌圈直径在12至19毫米之间。与溶血曼氏杆菌(8.3%)和其他益生菌(<2.2%)相比,乳杆菌属菌株和乳酸乳球菌对BBE细胞的黏附性更强(P<0.05)。与其他益生菌相比,多粘芽孢杆菌和嗜酸乳杆菌菌株通过取代和竞争作用,最大程度地降低了溶血曼氏杆菌的黏附。本研究结果表明,益生菌可能有定殖于牛呼吸道并对溶血曼氏杆菌1型发挥拮抗作用的潜力。

研究的意义和影响

在饲养场控制牛呼吸道疾病(BRD)的常用方法是在牛入场时通过大量使用抗生素进行预防性投药(即群体预防)。在饲养场中,越来越多地观察到BRD细菌病原体出现抗菌药物耐药性,这可能对牛的健康产生重要影响。在本研究中,益生菌菌株显示出能黏附于牛呼吸道细胞,并通过竞争和取代作用抑制BRD病原体溶血曼氏杆菌1型。因此,益生菌可能提供一种替代预防性抗菌药物的策略,以减少BRD细菌病原体。

相似文献

1
Probiotic bacteria inhibit the bovine respiratory pathogen Mannheimia haemolytica serotype 1 in vitro.益生菌在体外可抑制牛呼吸道病原体溶血曼氏杆菌1型。
Lett Appl Microbiol. 2017 May;64(5):343-349. doi: 10.1111/lam.12723.
2
Development of Bacterial Therapeutics against the Bovine Respiratory Pathogen Mannheimia haemolytica.开发针对牛呼吸道病原体溶血曼海姆菌的细菌治疗方法。
Appl Environ Microbiol. 2019 Oct 16;85(21). doi: 10.1128/AEM.01359-19. Print 2019 Nov 1.
3
Pathogenic Mannheimia haemolytica Invades Differentiated Bovine Airway Epithelial Cells.致病性曼海姆菌侵入分化的牛气道上皮细胞。
Infect Immun. 2019 May 21;87(6). doi: 10.1128/IAI.00078-19. Print 2019 Jun.
4
Prevalence and antimicrobial susceptibility of Mannheimia haemolytica, Pasteurella multocida, and Histophilus somni isolated from the lower respiratory tract of healthy feedlot cattle and those diagnosed with bovine respiratory disease.从健康饲养场牛的下呼吸道以及被诊断患有牛呼吸道疾病的牛的下呼吸道分离出的溶血曼氏杆菌、多杀巴斯德菌和睡眠嗜组织菌的流行情况及抗菌药敏性
Vet Microbiol. 2017 Sep;208:118-125. doi: 10.1016/j.vetmic.2017.07.013. Epub 2017 Jul 27.
5
Characterization of Mannheimia haemolytica isolated from feedlot cattle that were healthy or treated for bovine respiratory disease.从健康或因牛呼吸道疾病接受治疗的饲养场牛中分离出的溶血曼氏杆菌的特性分析。
Can J Vet Res. 2014 Jan;78(1):38-45.
6
In vitro evaluation on HeLa cells of protective mechanisms of probiotic lactobacilli against Candida clinical isolates.益生菌乳酸杆菌对白色念珠菌临床分离株保护机制的体外HeLa细胞评价
J Appl Microbiol. 2015 Nov;119(5):1383-90. doi: 10.1111/jam.12947. Epub 2015 Oct 5.
7
Intranasal Bacterial Therapeutics Reduce Colonization by the Respiratory Pathogen Mannheimia haemolytica in Dairy Calves.鼻内细菌疗法可减少奶牛犊牛呼吸道病原体溶血曼氏杆菌的定植。
mSystems. 2020 Mar 3;5(2):e00629-19. doi: 10.1128/mSystems.00629-19.
8
Coaggregation between probiotic bacteria and caries-associated strains: an in vitro study.益生菌与致龋菌的共聚作用:一项体外研究。
Acta Odontol Scand. 2009;67(5):284-8. doi: 10.1080/00016350902984237.
9
Essential oils inhibit the bovine respiratory pathogens Mannheimia haemolytica, Pasteurella multocida and Histophilus somni and have limited effects on commensal bacteria and turbinate cells in vitro.精油抑制牛呼吸道病原体溶血曼海姆菌、多杀巴斯德氏菌和副流感嗜血杆菌,对共生菌和鼻甲骨细胞的体外影响有限。
J Appl Microbiol. 2019 Jun;126(6):1668-1682. doi: 10.1111/jam.14238. Epub 2019 Apr 30.
10
Multidrug resistant Mannheimia haemolytica isolated from high-risk beef stocker cattle after antimicrobial metaphylaxis and treatment for bovine respiratory disease.多药耐药曼海姆菌从接受抗菌药物预防和治疗牛呼吸道疾病的高危肉牛中分离出来。
Vet Microbiol. 2018 Jul;221:143-152. doi: 10.1016/j.vetmic.2018.06.005. Epub 2018 Jun 8.

引用本文的文献

1
exerts anticancer effects and increase the chemosensitivity of 5-fluorouracil against oral cancer cells .发挥抗癌作用并增强5-氟尿嘧啶对口腔癌细胞的化学敏感性。
Bioimpacts. 2024 Aug 3;15:30427. doi: 10.34172/bi.30427. eCollection 2025.
2
The respiratory and fecal microbiota of beef calves from birth to weaning.牛犊从出生到断奶期间的呼吸和粪便微生物群。
mSystems. 2024 Jul 23;9(7):e0023824. doi: 10.1128/msystems.00238-24. Epub 2024 Jun 20.
3
The forecasting power of the mucin-microbiome interplay in livestock respiratory diseases.
黏液菌互作在家畜呼吸道疾病中的预测能力。
Vet Q. 2024 Dec;44(1):1-18. doi: 10.1080/01652176.2024.2340003. Epub 2024 Apr 12.
4
Screening and selection of essential oils for an intranasal spray against bovine respiratory pathogens based on antimicrobial, antiviral, immunomodulatory, and antibiofilm activities.基于抗菌、抗病毒、免疫调节和抗生物膜活性筛选和选择用于抗牛呼吸道病原体的鼻内喷雾剂的精油。
Front Vet Sci. 2024 Feb 7;11:1360398. doi: 10.3389/fvets.2024.1360398. eCollection 2024.
5
Auction market placement and a rest stop during transportation affect the respiratory bacterial microbiota of beef cattle.拍卖市场安置和运输途中的休息站会影响肉牛的呼吸道细菌微生物群。
Front Microbiol. 2023 Sep 22;14:1192763. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2023.1192763. eCollection 2023.
6
Understanding the mechanisms of viral and bacterial coinfections in bovine respiratory disease: a comprehensive literature review of experimental evidence.了解牛呼吸道疾病中病毒和细菌合并感染的机制:实验证据的综合文献综述。
Vet Res. 2022 Sep 6;53(1):70. doi: 10.1186/s13567-022-01086-1.
7
Identification of bovine respiratory disease through the nasal microbiome.通过鼻腔微生物群鉴定牛呼吸道疾病
Anim Microbiome. 2022 Feb 22;4(1):15. doi: 10.1186/s42523-022-00167-y.
8
The Airway Pathobiome in Complex Respiratory Diseases: A Perspective in Domestic Animals.复杂呼吸疾病中的气道微生物组:家养动物视角。
Front Cell Infect Microbiol. 2021 May 14;11:583600. doi: 10.3389/fcimb.2021.583600. eCollection 2021.
9
Intranasal Bacterial Therapeutics Reduce Colonization by the Respiratory Pathogen Mannheimia haemolytica in Dairy Calves.鼻内细菌疗法可减少奶牛犊牛呼吸道病原体溶血曼氏杆菌的定植。
mSystems. 2020 Mar 3;5(2):e00629-19. doi: 10.1128/mSystems.00629-19.
10
Development of Bacterial Therapeutics against the Bovine Respiratory Pathogen Mannheimia haemolytica.开发针对牛呼吸道病原体溶血曼海姆菌的细菌治疗方法。
Appl Environ Microbiol. 2019 Oct 16;85(21). doi: 10.1128/AEM.01359-19. Print 2019 Nov 1.