IHAP, Université de Toulouse, INRAE, ENVT, Toulouse, France.
Vet Res. 2022 Sep 6;53(1):70. doi: 10.1186/s13567-022-01086-1.
Bovine respiratory disease (BRD) is one of the most important diseases impacting the global cattle industry, resulting in significant economic loss. Commonly referred to as shipping fever, BRD is especially concerning for young calves during transport when they are most susceptible to developing disease. Despite years of extensive study, managing BRD remains challenging as its aetiology involves complex interactions between pathogens, environmental and host factors. While at the beginning of the twentieth century, scientists believed that BRD was only caused by bacterial infections ("bovine pasteurellosis"), we now know that viruses play a key role in BRD induction. Mixtures of pathogenic bacteria and viruses are frequently isolated from respiratory secretions of animals with respiratory illness. The increased diagnostic screening data has changed our understanding of pathogens contributing to BRD development. In this review, we aim to comprehensively examine experimental evidence from all existing studies performed to understand coinfections between respiratory pathogens in cattle. Despite the fact that pneumonia has not always been successfully reproduced by in vivo calf modelling, several studies attempted to investigate the clinical significance of interactions between different pathogens. The most studied model of pneumonia induction has been reproduced by a primary viral infection followed by a secondary bacterial superinfection, with strong evidence suggesting this could potentially be one of the most common scenarios during BRD onset. Different in vitro studies indicated that viral priming may increase bacterial adherence and colonization of the respiratory tract, suggesting a possible mechanism underpinning bronchopneumonia onset in cattle. In addition, a few in vivo studies on viral coinfections and bacterial coinfections demonstrated that a primary viral infection could also increase the pathogenicity of a secondary viral infection and, similarly, dual infections with two bacterial pathogens could increase the severity of BRD lesions. Therefore, different scenarios of pathogen dynamics could be hypothesized for BRD onset which are not limited to a primary viral infection followed by a secondary bacterial superinfection.
牛呼吸道疾病(BRD)是影响全球养牛业的最重要疾病之一,导致了巨大的经济损失。通常被称为运输热,BRD 在运输过程中对小牛尤其令人担忧,因为它们最容易患上疾病。尽管经过多年的广泛研究,管理 BRD 仍然具有挑战性,因为其病因涉及病原体、环境和宿主因素之间的复杂相互作用。虽然在 20 世纪初,科学家们认为 BRD 仅由细菌感染引起(“牛巴氏杆菌病”),但我们现在知道病毒在 BRD 诱导中起关键作用。从患有呼吸道疾病的动物的呼吸道分泌物中经常分离出致病性细菌和病毒的混合物。增加的诊断筛选数据改变了我们对导致 BRD 发展的病原体的理解。在这篇综述中,我们旨在全面检查所有现有研究的实验证据,以了解牛呼吸道病原体的合并感染。尽管肺炎在体内小牛模型中并不总是成功复制,但仍有几项研究试图研究不同病原体之间相互作用的临床意义。最常研究的肺炎诱导模型是通过原发性病毒感染后继发性细菌继发感染复制的,有强有力的证据表明,这可能是 BRD 发病过程中最常见的情况之一。不同的体外研究表明,病毒启动可能会增加细菌对呼吸道的粘附和定植,这表明了牛支气管肺炎发病的一种可能机制。此外,一些关于病毒合并感染和细菌合并感染的体内研究表明,原发性病毒感染也可能增加继发性病毒感染的致病性,类似地,两种细菌病原体的双重感染也可能增加 BRD 病变的严重程度。因此,BRD 发病的病原体动态可以假设不同的情况,而不仅仅限于原发性病毒感染后继发性细菌继发感染。