Held Jeremia P, Klaassen Bart, van Beijnum Bert-Jan F, Luft Andreas R, Veltink Peter H
Biomedical Signals and Systems, MIRA - Institute for Biomedical Technology and Technical Medicine, University of Twente, Enschede, Netherlands; Division of Vascular Neurology and Neurorehabilitation, Department of Neurology, University Hospital of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland; Cereneo, Center for Neurology and Rehabilitation, Vitznau, Switzerland.
Biomedical Signals and Systems, MIRA - Institute for Biomedical Technology and Technical Medicine, University of Twente, Enschede, Netherlands; Centre for Telematics and Information Technology, University of Twente, Enschede, Netherlands.
Front Bioeng Biotechnol. 2017 Jan 24;4:98. doi: 10.3389/fbioe.2016.00098. eCollection 2016.
To increase the functional capabilities of stroke subjects during activities of daily living, patients receive rehabilitative training to recover adequate motor control. With the goal to motivate self-training by use of the arm in daily life tasks, a sensor system (Arm Usage Coach, AUC) was developed that provides VibroTactile (VT) feedback if the patient does not move the affected arm above a certain threshold level. The objective of this study is to investigate the usability of this system in stroke subjects.
The study was designed as a usability and user acceptance study of feedback modalities. Stroke subjects with mild to moderate arm impairments were enrolled. The subjects wore two AUC devices one on each wrist. VT feedback was given by the device on the affected arm. A semi-structured interview was performed before and after a measurement session with the AUC. In addition, the System Usability Scale (SUS) questionnaire was given.
Ten ischemic chronic stroke patients (39 ± 38 months after stroke) were recruited. Four out of 10 subjects have worn the VT feedback on their dominant, affected arm. In the pre-measurement interview, eight participants indicated a preference for acoustic or visual over VT feedback. In the post evaluation interview, nine of 10 participants preferred VT over visual and acoustic feedback. On average, the AUC gave VT feedback six times during the measurement session. All participants, with the exception of one, used their dominant arm more then the non-dominant. For the SUS, eight participants responded above 80%, one between 70 and 80%, and one participant responded below 50%.
More patients accepted and valued VT feedback after the test period, hence VT is a feasible feedback modality. The AUC can be used as a telerehabilitation device to train and maintain upper extremity use in daily life tasks.
为了提高中风患者在日常生活活动中的功能能力,患者接受康复训练以恢复足够的运动控制。为了通过在日常生活任务中使用手臂来激励自我训练,开发了一种传感器系统(手臂使用教练,AUC),如果患者受影响的手臂移动未超过某个阈值水平,该系统会提供振动触觉(VT)反馈。本研究的目的是调查该系统在中风患者中的可用性。
该研究设计为反馈方式的可用性和用户接受度研究。纳入了轻度至中度手臂损伤的中风患者。受试者在每个手腕上佩戴一个AUC设备。受影响手臂上的设备提供VT反馈。在使用AUC进行测量之前和之后进行了半结构化访谈。此外,还发放了系统可用性量表(SUS)问卷。
招募了10名缺血性慢性中风患者(中风后39±38个月)。10名受试者中有4名在其优势受影响手臂上佩戴了VT反馈。在测量前的访谈中,8名参与者表示更喜欢听觉或视觉反馈而不是VT反馈。在测量后的评估访谈中,10名参与者中有9名更喜欢VT反馈而不是视觉和听觉反馈。在测量过程中,AUC平均提供6次VT反馈。除1名参与者外,所有参与者使用优势手臂的次数多于非优势手臂。对于SUS,8名参与者的回答高于80%,1名在70%至80%之间,1名参与者的回答低于50%。
在测试期后,更多患者接受并重视VT反馈,因此VT是一种可行的反馈方式。AUC可作为远程康复设备,用于在日常生活任务中训练和维持上肢的使用。